Mafia 110: Mafia in Hell, Michigan (Tied.)

[Rikenslope]

Alright So my number one scummy suspects in no particular order...

SK- While your head or heart may not be in the game. The flip-flop voting is really killing me and even if you are a townie really make you look scummy. Something about it makes me feel like you may just be sliding back and forth for funzies. Until a time for a better strike against someone else, then say well I have been just following the crowd.

Richard- Your questioning and subsequent meaningless defenses really make you seem like the inside of a dirty shower at a YMCA type of Scummy. I think so far my vote is with you.

Beater-You have tried to defend yourself with I am a noob...I misdefined a word. This being my first game on MafiaScum doesnt allow me to believe that. as I know what tunnel vision is, you should know as well. Its not really a hard concept. But who knows.

Vote Richard

[Ythan]

Not providing content would be active lurking; active lurking is a very popular scum tell. Scum are more likely to win if they convey a pro-town attitude. There's really nothing to gain from avoiding in-depth content; I've seen scum belt it out all the time.

So it's not scummy because it's scummy?

<--------------------

Watcher

Everybody unvote now. kthxbai.

Is that so.

Everyone pay attention to the people going after SK. I think it's a stretch to follow it as hard as they are. I may be wrong or it may be scummy.

[crypto]

Fuck. Damn. It.

Unvote.

Vote: horrordude0215.

Scum-O-Meter

0.1 Ythan
0.1 Dedicated Scribe
0.2 Nobody Special
0.3 molestargazer
0.3 farside22
0.4 RichardGHP
0.4 jbernier93
0.4 Lowell
0.4 Rikenslope
0.5 RayFrost
0.5 Musher333
0.5 Cirno
0.5 Dr.Cyanide
0.6 pman5595
0.6 septL
0.6 ace5993
0.6 WRP_Beater
0.7 SaintKerrigan
0.8 horrordude0215

And you get this how?

I'm trying to force myself to stop ignoring my gut reads. Every time I push them aside, I regret it, and then I just do the same damn thing again.

[crypto]

So it's not scummy because it's scummy?

It depends on the player.

[Ythan]

It depends on the player.

How well do you know the players in this game?

[Nobody Special]

Ythan doesn't love me anymore.

@StKerrigan: What are your thoughts on lynching lurkers?

Depends on the type of lurking. Plain ol' lurking, do nothing about. Active lurking, on the other hand, is something I would consider lynching over.
Why ask me specifically?

FoS: WRP_Beater

for his convenient and timely entrance.

That's why. I wanted to know why you only placed a FoS on WRP rather than a vote. So, given what you said, would you consider lynching WRP? (I think you would; obviously, you're ready to lynch anyone based on how many times your vote has switched. )

FoS: DedicatedScribe for this wiki gambit thing. I wrinkle my nose at you, Sir.

Also, @Mod: Please note I voted in my post about the votecount.

[crypto]

So it's not scummy because it's scummy?

It depends on the player.

Which I guess makes it a null tell.

[crypto]

Ythan, I'm not using it as a tell. I don't know many of them very well, but I don't need to meta them to grasp their style and level of investment in the game—it's self-evident in the thread.

[crypto]

Blargh. I mean that I'm not actively using it as a tell in this game; I think such a tell exists.

[jbernier93]

If only you all knew how much my head is hurting right now after a huge collision with my palm.

Claim time.

<--------------------

Watcher

Everybody unvote now. kthxbai.

Why do you have be such an ass about everything you do?
It's not helping. at all.

[jbernier93]

Anyway

unvote

for now, and then

vote:WRP

because he has now admitted to not being a total noob yet his actios still don't make sense.

[crypto]

Does that necessarily make him scum, or especially scummy, in your eyes?

[Ythan]

How safe a fake claim is watcher for scum?

[jbernier93]

Does that necessarily make him scum, or especially scummy, in your eyes?

It makes him vote worthy, and some of his statements have been scummy as others have clearly pointed out.

[crypto]

Does that necessarily make him scum, or especially scummy, in your eyes?

It makes him vote worthy, and some of his statements have been scummy as others have clearly pointed out.

Your answer should be "Yes/no and here's why . . ."

Ythan, you tell us. I find it mildly creative, so I'm more inclined to believe it.

[horrordude0215]

Just in case...

Unvote

But if there's a CC... I think I'll go back to you

[crypto]

y r u so skumy

[Ythan]

Mildly creative. Any way we can test if he's legit? If not I am not inclined to remove my vote.

[crypto]

Night zero . . . ? I don't know, I assumed there wasn't one. You're not role-fishing, are you?

I'd rather not risk an investigative role who doubles up as a mafia visit deterrent.

[SaintKerrigan]

Urgh.

Unvote: RichardGHP. Vote: Rikenslope.

Why is your vote on someone who just claimed a power role?

Ythan, why is it a stretch that people are going after me?

[Ythan]

How is it role fishing when he's already claimed?

[Ythan]

Ythan, why is it a stretch that people are going after me?

Case seems to be based entirely on your vote changes, which seemed perfectly reasonable to me in context when you made them and still do now.

[SaintKerrigan]

SK: The devil is in the details. You are leaving details out when you vote and just going along with the BW without reason. That is what you seem continue to do.

Like I said earlier, my head is not entirely in this game yet. If the past is any indication, I tend to get better as the days go by and there's fewer people posting. So, give me more time, and I'll get better at this.

[RichardGHP]

Richard- Your questioning and subsequent meaningless defenses really make you seem like the inside of a dirty shower at a YMCA type of Scummy. I think so far my vote is with you.

Vote Richard

"Hey guys, I'm scum trying to push for a mislynch of a town PR!"

unvote vote Rikenslope

.

If any CCs my claim they are getting lynched today.

[Ythan]

Your claim puts a dent in your scummy play but not a big one for me.