By that same token,
The rest of you, I don't know. But we have a whole game to get to know each other, don't we? Well, less time for some of you, but that shouldn't discourage you from making friends!
You argued that your argument is the same as mine, which is impossible since my argument was that Mindgamer was Ice Mafia specifically while you stated he could be either Fire or Ice Mafia. Thus, it sure looks like you were just piggybacking on my vote, and then tried to use my argument to explain why you thought Mindgamer was mafia. That feels scummy.pwnman wrote:Yeah, never consider the fact that I thought it was a scum slip up too.
I disagree with you on that one...not only has Pwnman done the things that earned him ire, but under pressure he chose to respond by simply claiming town. I don't see that behavior coming from a townsperson.DarkLightA wrote:Still, I think this looks un-scummish, for both of you... Looks like just innocent stuff, only based on weak theories.
This. Is. Awful.Mindgamer wrote:Eh... yeah... I don't really see much to do, sorry. :/
My joke could be interpreted as a scumslip. I don't like how Crazy refuses to understand that.
Unvote. Vote: Crazy
Bandwagon go!
/goes back to lurking
You're conjuring things out of nothing. Pwnman never said he was wrong.DTMaster wrote:1. You said your case was wrong in hindsight, but pwnman can't be given the same grace. Pwnman admitted before you (this post) that he was wrong, but you are attacking pwnman for something you are guilty for.
Repeat that. This time, include quotes.DTMaster wrote:2. Crazy expressed prefrence that mindgamer appears like ice scum under your argument: but the fact that you don't address Crazy of this is contradictory when you tunnel heavily on pwnman
I don't see that as him admitting that he's wrong.DTMaster wrote:@Pwnman being wrongpwnman wrote:Yeah, never consider the fact that I thought it was a scum slip up too.
I think Crazy should be defending himself, but I'm going to say that you're pushing a whole lot of nothing. It was fairly clear to me that Crazy was making these argumentsDTMaster wrote:Crazy wrote: A. Mindgamer is town, and the post was a joke.
B. Mindgamer is Ice Mafia, and the post was a joke.
C. Mindgamer is Fire Mafia, and the post was a joke.
D. Mindgamer is Ice Mafia, and the post was a scum-slip.
Option E - "Mindgamer is Fire Mafia, and the post was a scum-slip" does not exist.Crazy wrote:My read on Mindgamer is pretty neutral; he could be town or either scum. All I've said is, IF HE SLIPPED, THEN HE'S ICE SCUM. To me, that means nothing, because I don't think he slipped. That only has relevance to SK and pwnman.^^ Prefrence at Ice Scum. If Crazy ruled out Mindgamer-firescum. He is left with Town-Mindgamer or Icescum-Mindgamer.Crazy wrote:@DTM and pwnman - Please explain how Mindgamer's first post could possibly be a slip from a Fire Mafia!
I explained how a firescum-Mindgamer would make a Freudian slip, by delfecting attention towards someone as fire scum
Depends on the type of lurker. Active lurking, sure. General lurking, not really. That FoS post was more of an expression that the lurkers needed to get their act together and start doing stuff.Scott Brosius wrote:SK: You FoS all the lurkers in this game, are you willing to lynch one D1?
This post rubs me the wrong way. It almost reads like a scum mind thinking out loud. At the same time, I'm still waiting to hear from Mindgamer, so for now I'll just put down aICEninja wrote:I must also consider what a push against either of you would mean. IMO both DT and Crazy respond fairly well to attacks against them while other players simply look really bad. This combined with the fact that a mislynch on DT would be quite bad for the town, I am going to switch my focus.