Mini 897 - OpenSource Mafia - Game over!!

[UncertainKitten]

But I was town. And you've played with me long enough to know how I play.

Hopefully you knew damn well I wasn't scum.

Logic does not a townie make.

[SocioPath]

Indeed. You are on permanent radar from now on.

Oh yeah, and I TOLD YOU Pom was scum.

I think Pom has been scum in every game I've played with her, as well.

[SocioPath]

But I was town.

And I wasn't. ;D

And you've played with me long enough to know how I play.

Of which I will still try to change parts of.

Hopefully you knew damn well I wasn't scum.

At that point, it didn't matter to me.
The incessant needless babble was detracting from my actual scum hunting.
You're a good player, and I like your play style...but when I have to repeat myself enough times...kill mode gets activated.

Logic does not a townie make.

This is true.
But, I've been known to say (and stand behind) that I would rather lynch anti-town town that I know is town, than very pro-town scum that I know is scum.
(Barring obvious end-game and possible end-game scenarios.)

[UncertainKitten]

This is true.
But, I've been known to say (and stand behind) that I would rather lynch anti-town town that I know is town, than very pro-town scum that I know is scum.
(Barring obvious end-game and possible end-game scenarios.)

And that's retarded. Granted, you were an SK so it doesn't matter as much. Had you been a town vig I'd consider your behavior far more anti town than mine.

It's a shame I dropped the case on Iec though. I need to learn to follow through more when I get a read. Saving SSK and Vaya was mainly because I thought I was seeing town v. town and I've been trying a new experimental playstyle with SSK.

You're a good player, and I like your play style...but when I have to repeat myself enough times...kill mode gets activated.

This doesn't jibe with everything else you are saying. Trying to soften the blow or something?

[Iecerint]

I was proud of my fakeclaim, at least. For anyone who wants to know, I was a roleblocker who roleblocked Phate N1. So I was as confused as the rest of you by tubby's claim. I thought a 3rd party player was responsible until SP NK'd me.

Apparently, I was secretly a gimp roleblocker who only worked if I targeted an alignment-changer who targeted scum. Too bad for me.

[Iecerint]

You mean your "case" that I was scum with Vaya?

I wish people had followed me against SP's very silly attack on him. I might have gotten +like points.

[SocioPath]

This is true.
But, I've been known to say (and stand behind) that I would rather lynch anti-town town that I know is town, than very pro-town scum that I know is scum.
(Barring obvious end-game and possible end-game scenarios.)

And that's retarded.

I've been told such anytime I state that.

You're a good player, and I like your play style...but when I have to repeat myself enough times...kill mode gets activated.

This doesn't jibe with everything else you are saying. Trying to soften the blow or something?

Pretty much.

[MafiaSSK]

Of course, SP just had to be the SK. I could have killed you and won the game. Ah well.

[SlySly]

Apparently, I was secretly a gimp roleblocker who only worked if I targeted an alignment-changer who targeted scum. Too bad for me.

2. Iecerint - Microsuck Lead Developer - Mafia Weak RB ^ (weak unknown to player,

only RB's if cop target is mafia

) shows as innocent to insane, shows guilty to sane

You are partially right. You would have blocked investigation attempts targeting mafia. That would give no results and they wouldn't have had the option to run an alignment script.

[Iecerint]

Oh, and I think SSK's D1 slip about my "nonexistent" scum meta was based on the fact that he had just converted me as scum in EmpKing's SuperUPick into a kinda hopeless situation. I was terrified that someone would figure it out. ^^;

[SocioPath]

You mean your "case" that I was scum with Vaya?

It feel like I was arguing with myself on Day 3 since the consensus seemed to be just to state there was a connection and quote me on it when at that point Vaya was so town in my eyes.

D1, when I made that points, yes, I thought you and Vaya could have been scum together. Although I was certainly more sure about you than Vaya (hence the kill.)

Later in the day though, and following days...Vaya I wasn't going to touch.

[Iecerint]

Well, maybe you knew that by N2. You had some fairly compelling evidence. ^^;

[UncertainKitten]

This is true.
But, I've been known to say (and stand behind) that I would rather lynch anti-town town that I know is town, than very pro-town scum that I know is scum.
(Barring obvious end-game and possible end-game scenarios.)

And that's retarded.

I've been told such anytime I state that.

You're a good player, and I like your play style...but when I have to repeat myself enough times...kill mode gets activated.

This doesn't jibe with everything else you are saying. Trying to soften the blow or something?

Pretty much.

Whatever. I am actually forced to cede you are a good scumhunter when you aren't being a fucktard. TTGL mafia was amazing.

You mean your "case" that I was scum with Vaya? Razz

I wish people had followed me against SP's very silly attack on him. I might have gotten +like points. Sad

Obviously! I was right for the wrong reasons!

You are partially right. You would have blocked investigation attempts targeting mafia. That would give no results and they wouldn't have had the option to run an alignment script.

Oh yeah! Why did all my reads fail?

[SlySly]

Oh yeah! Why did all my reads fail?

In this game, only cops had sanity that could be checked.

[SlySly]

NIGHT ACTIONS

Night 1:
1. Snow_Bunny (Sane Cop) - /investigate Phate - Innocent results
2. Phate (Insane Cop) - /investigate Snow_Bunny - Guilty results
3. Vaya (Doctor) - /protect Snow_Bunny
4. UncertainKitty (Psychiatrist) - /target MafiaSSK - No results
5. Iecerint (weak mafia RB) - block Phate - No block as Phate's target was not mafia
6. Mafia - Kill:Glork
7. SocioPath - /script SocioPath - No effect.

Night 2:
1. Snow_Bunny (sane Cop) - /investigate Pomegranate(Mafia GF) - Innocent results
2. Vaya (Doctor) - /protect UncertainKitty
3. UncertainKitty (Psychiatrist) - /reveal Iecerint - No results
4. Iecerint (Mafia Weak RB) - /block SocioPath - No block as SocioPath's not a cop targetting mafia
5. Mafia - Kill:AlmasterGM
6. SocioPath - /delete Iecerint

Night 3:
1. Snow_Bunny (sane Cop) - /investigate UncertainKitty (Psychiatrist) - Innocent results
2. Mafia - Kill:Fishy
3. SocioPath - /delete UncertainKitty
4. UncertainKitty - /reveal MafiaSSK - no results

Night 4:
1. Snow_Bunny (sane Cop) - /investigate SocioPath (Psychiatrist) - Innocent results
2. Mafia - Kill:SnowBunny
3. SocioPath - /delete Pomegranate

[Iecerint]

Meh. At least I knew to block SP.

[UncertainKitten]

Well, that sucks.

I mean, hell, I was targetting scum BOTH TIMES! I should have known they were lying .

[Iecerint]

All three times, actually. It's cute that you doublechecked that it was your wording that led to no result on SSK. ^^;

[UncertainKitten]

All three times, actually. It's cute that you doublechecked that it was your wording that led to no result on SSK. ^^;

Oh, no, at that point I was hoping I was too scummy to be "roleblocked"

But it didn't work.

[Iecerint]

Oh, I see. Makes sense. It was cuter when it was my explanation, though.

I was surprised no one called me out on sorta believing the RB on you D1 at first in spite of being a kind of RBer myself. I was going to point out that there was also parallelism in Phate's role and SB's, and Phate had been shown innocent. <_<

But then Phate had to go and claim JUST WHAT MADE MY (UNCLAIMED) FAKE ABILITY MAKE HIM GUILTY.

I am inflexible.

[UncertainKitten]

Meh. I was lost after D1. I sorta gave up there :S.

[SocioPath]

I mean, hell, I was targetting scum BOTH TIMES! I should have known they were lying .

I was surprised no one called me out on sorta believing the RB on you D1 at first in spite of being a kind of RBer myself. I was going to point out that there was also parallelism in Phate's role and SB's, and Phate had been shown innocent. <_<

The "Occam's razor" on that arguement...RAAAAAAAGE. >:C

'...so the simplest explanation you have have is that SSK is town...and is insane...and that explains his guilty result on the innocent Vaya...and that you were role blocked when checking the sanity of SSK...

...The simplest explanation couldn't possibly be that SSK doesn't have a sanity so you would get no results regardless of your contrived situation.'


WAT.

[SocioPath]

Whatever. I am actually forced to cede you are a good scumhunter when you aren't being a fucktard. TTGL mafia was amazing.

I'm abrasive and efficient.

Fucktardicity also certainly helps me find scum some times.

When in doubt, see username.

[Iecerint]

WAT.

inorite? I think it was Vaya that pointed out that UK was an obvious RB target. I <3 Vaya.

I probably would have targeted her had I not known that she would get a similar result either way.

[SocioPath]

The first 3/5 of page 37 was amusing in that regards in a fun-bash-your-head-into-a-wall-repeatedly kind of way.