Open 203: C/9 Mafia Wins!

[Wdjat]

Because.. i.. don't..want.. to.. kill.. townies. -.-

This...post...is...really...bad. Oh and so is your gameplay this whole game. You're taking stances and throwing your vote around without backing it up with a damn thing, I ask you to elaborate and you call me mean and unhelpful? Too bad, I am going to bring the PAIN.

Well, look. Suddenly "reads" changes to "read". And you call it the same thing. Pressuring for a single read on him is not the same as pressuring for all of my reads. I already have explained my reason for voting for him originally. Stop making such a big deal out of this. You're making yourself look scummy by trying to make me the focus of everyone's attention (not that I mind that so much, I have nothing to hide).

This post sounds unbelievably townie.

Elaborate

We have to start hunting somewhere. And i got a huge town vibe from Dana, and the exact oposite from Kunk. I am not sayin Kunk is obv scum, but for now is my strgongest suspect

Elaborate

I'd rather see a lowel wagon

Elaborate

The alternativo to lowel is NOT a no lynch

ELABORATE

Actually, wait for danakillsu to respond to me before you talk about how town he is. But then you can ELABORATE.

Vote Count-Sho
Scott-tatetothetot,
Lowell-Wdjat, gameplayah, the1fifi, kunkstar7, kyle99
Max-Gayle, kyle99, Jacob Savage
Jacob Savage-danakillsu
danakillsu-wdjat
Kunkstar-Lowell, Gayle, Gheb
Wdjat-Tatetothetot

[Max]

I actually find wdjat's last post amusing.

The kunk wagon could use some support, or someone give me something else to do.

Here's something for you to do... post something with content.

Post 114 by the1fifi is a bit iffy. I said "Lowell is evidently scum"...
next post (fifi's): "vote: lowell"?? - Interesting that no reason is provided.

Lowell is starting to reek of scum. He just picks someone and starts to follow the crowd, very little original thought and his votes are just "I agree with ______", and his original content level is quite low.

So, what is the difference between you and him. Pot, kettle, black?

Right... So an ISO on Kyle is to come. One moment I think he's scum. Very weak scum at that

[Max]

A History of Hypocrisy - Kyle99

ISO 5 - "have a few town tells and a small scumvibe from max"
ISO 6 (3 hours later with no post from me) - "I have <snip> scumvibes from max"

So what happened to the few town tells, few > a small. What happened between the two posts?

ISO 8 - "I reread and I think that Max is just a townie trying to hard."

So I'm townie again? Right.

ISO 9 (No post from me again) - "I honestly think that Lowell is acting scummier than Max atm"

Right? So somehow I'm townie and Lowell is scummier than townie?

ISO 10: "Lowell is jumping on bandwagons, following the crowd, and uses generally bad logic."

I've yet to see a single example of good logic from you. I think you're scum, and you haven't improved things. I think Lowell is lurking scummy as hell but... There's no denying that you are scummy.

Pros Of A Kyle99 Lynch: Has made opinions clear on other people, few, but gives us something to work on.
Pros of a lowell lynch: Lurker dead.

Vote: Kyle99

[JacobSavage]

@Wdjat

This is an awful post. Come play mafia with us, please.

Sorry I am so quiet.

Vote Lowell

More of a personal one against, people that use logic. It makes it hard to follow with people dragging it off the beaten track

[JacobSavage]

Cancel Last post,
I am more inclined, once someone has outlined clear reasons for a lynch, it is often an advantage to use this information, against others, depending on what he turns out to be.

Unvote

[tatetothetot]

Wdjat, lynching you would help me determine Dana's alignment. I believe that out of the two of you, one of you is scum.

The1fifi was voting lowell at the time but there were several others who were putting pressure just because others had done so. Krunk and Kyle for example

I have already stated that Gayle had a similar style of posting from another game I was in with him. The difference between him and lurkers voting for Max is that, Max was attacking his thoughts, not his lack of activity.

Yes I am buddying to Max. He probably doesn't want that, but I did it anyways.

Why don't you post thoughts instead of massing questions and telling people to elaborate?

[danakillsu]

ok, JacobSavage is obviously going to actually play this game now.

unvote vote: wdjat

your pressuring of me is ridiculous and you're not helping town at all. A lynch of you would also help prove my alignment, I believe.

[The1fifi]

@Wdjat : You are beginning to annoy me. I don't have much time for this site, and i am really busy in another game. Thats the only reason i don't elaborate. but i damn know how to find scum, so you just shut the hell up cause you are an annoying little authoritary brat. And you don't order me to elaborate. until you learn how to direct to people, go bang your head against a tree.

[The1fifi]

Wdjat, lynching you would help me determine Dana's alignment. I believe that out of the two of you, one of you is scum.

The1fifi was voting lowell at the time but there were several others who were putting pressure just because others had done so. Krunk and Kyle for example

I have already stated that Gayle had a similar style of posting from another game I was in with him. The difference between him and lurkers voting for Max is that, Max was attacking his thoughts, not his lack of activity.

Yes I am buddying to Max. He probably doesn't want that, but I did it anyways.

Why don't you post thoughts instead of massing questions and telling people to elaborate

?

This resumes everything you do. Instead of scumhunting, you are playing a tactic of smokes and mirrors.

Unvote

Vote Wdjat

[kyle99]

A History of Hypocrisy - Kyle99

ISO 5 - "have a few town tells and a small scumvibe from max"
ISO 6 (3 hours later with no post from me) - "I have <snip> scumvibes from max"

So what happened to the few town tells, few > a small. What happened between the two posts?

They still exist, I just didn't feel the need to mention them again.

ISO 8 - "I reread and I think that Max is just a townie trying to hard."

So I'm townie again? Right.

Sorry, forgot that rereading and changing your opinions is against the mafia laws.

ISO 9 (No post from me again) - "I honestly think that Lowell is acting scummier than Max atm"

Right? So somehow I'm townie and Lowell is scummier than townie?

Usually, scum act scummier than town. Whodathunkit?

ISO 10: "Lowell is jumping on bandwagons, following the crowd, and uses generally bad logic."

I've yet to see a single example of good logic from you. I think you're scum, and you haven't improved things. I think Lowell is lurking scummy as hell but... There's no denying that you are scummy.

So I should push for a Kyle99 lynch because Max thinks I don't use good logic? Brilliant. Lowell is lurking and using bad logic so I think he should go.

[Lowell]

I was about to jump on the wdjat wagon but some sketchy people have beat me to it. Hard to say why, but 149 really rubs me the wrong way, as does much of the tone wdjat has taken here. Questions like "what would my flipping scum reveal to you?" are really not helpful. Call it "defense by diversion" if you will.

[Gayle]

@MOD:

Are you alive? I know the streets of Shibuya are a dangerous place, but I would appreciate it if you let us know whether you were gunned down or something. I was recently in a game inwhich the mod was too sick to post, and it is not fun dealing with accidental hammers due to a lack of vote counts. Also,

Gameplayah needs to be replaced

. He hasn't posted since the 12th.

[Gayle]

Guess Sho actually is around. I didn't even notice that vote count. Can you... make it stand out a little more?

[Gheb]

Votecount is wrong. I'm voting kunk right now and I'm fairly happy with that. Dana's OMGUS vote from 156 is duly noted.

FoS

for that.

[Max]

Usually, scum act scummier than town. Whodathunkit?

I'm just saying that it's incoherent to say that somebody is acting scummier than someone you think is town. Saying even more so that wdjat would be comparatively useful, the one you used is bizarre and appears lazy.

[danakillsu]

Dana's OMGUS vote from 156 is duly noted. FoS for that.

Perhaps if you read the thread you would discover that I voted wdjat before he voted me.

[Gheb]

It's still OMGUS on your part.

[danakillsu]

No, it's not. The only reason I left wdjat to vote someone else was that I thought he should be pressured to post. The first and prominent scum-read I got was wdjat. Your continual accusations without basis earn a big fat

HoS

from me. His vote on me was OMGUS, if anything.
@all
what impression do you get? does it look like OMGUS for me to return my vote to wdjat?

[The1fifi]

No, becausw Wdjat annoys me like ****, and i'd OMGUs him all the way to hell.

[Gheb]

It was OMGUS because you literally said "his pressure against you is ridiculous" and vote him right afterward. That's textbook OMGUS.

[Gayle]

Sho:

Can you place a deadline?

[Wdjat]

Wdjat, lynching you would help me determine Dana's alignment. I believe that out of the two of you, one of you is scum.

If you believe one of us is definitely scum, who do you think it more valuable alive going into day two?

The1fifi was voting lowell at the time but there were several others who were putting pressure just because others had done so. Krunk and Kyle for example

You've justified your wording, but managed to avoid talking about The 1iffi.

Why don't you post thoughts instead of massing questions and telling people to elaborate?

I would hope that it's clear enough in my posts that the people I am pressuring are people that I think are scummy. I'll get back to this in a bit.

[Wdjat]

@Wdjat : You are beginning to annoy me. I don't have much time for this site, and i am really busy in another game. Thats the only reason i don't elaborate. but i damn know how to find scum, so you just shut the hell up cause you are an annoying little authoritary brat. And you don't order me to elaborate. until you learn how to direct to people, go bang your head against a tree.

Dude, you can just explain your stances and I won't have to put elaborate under every post you make. Here, we will compromise. You can make your claims about what you believe and then link the posts that most prove them. Then we can ask follow up questions.

If you're going to make statements like "i damn know how to find scum," back it up with evidence. Your goal should be to be understood. Right now you're just posting crap with no clear basis. Maybe after the game you can rub it in our face that you were right all along, but I'd really rather you rub it in my face now.

[Wdjat]

Why don't you post thoughts instead of massing questions and telling people to elaborate

?

This resumes everything you do. Instead of scumhunting, you are playing a tactic of smokes and mirrors.

Unvote

Vote Wdjat

See this is a better post than this. PROGRESS!

[Wdjat]

what impression do you get? does it look like OMGUS for me to return my vote to wdjat?

It should come as no shock that I do this:

unvote vote: wdjat

your pressuring of me is ridiculous

Hottttt vote. Show us why it's ridiculous.