Open 202 - Friends JK 9 (Game Over)
-
-
Wdjat
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Yeah, this still doesn't make sense. How does his comment on Lowell and the fact that he's played with him before combine to make him an easy target. And to whom is he an easy target?nessarae56 wrote:i mean since he said that it would make one palyer an easy target.. since they played together. he himself will be an easy target as well there for he has made himself better know to me.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Changing the plan so the scum don't catch on: nessarae56, who ISN'T your scumbuddy?Sleepless Assassin wrote:
That was the plan, but now you just told the scum that's what we are doing.TDC wrote:SA/Lowell: I have a brilliant idea, if we do that for all combinations we have this solved in no time!FoS TDCmecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Yeah, that's not how mafia works. You've got two posts below yours saying you don't make sense and one post just above. Explain the reasoning behind your conclusion that had everyone confused, even if you think it's bad now. You can tell us why you decided your reasoning was bad while you're at it.nessarae56 wrote:Sorry for what i said. I had no idea what i was talking about. So can we just start over. Thank youmecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Between don_johnson and semioldguy's posts, I am just so thrilled about playing with Lowell.* Given that dude's got a history of looking scummy, I don't think he's the right lynch today. But his meta definitely sounds like someone who can be scum and try to brush his scummy behavior off as Lowell being Lowell.
*Sarcasm, y'all.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Dude you are just making shit up when you read my post. People with a history of looking scummy are bad day one lynches. When they look scummy it means less. We can lynch him tomorrow if there's more to back it up, but he's not the right lynch today.Sleepless Assassin wrote:
So because he plays scummy, he can't be scum? That's just giving him a free pass to endgame because obviously scum won't kill him if he's scummy.Wdjat wrote:Between don_johnson and semioldguy's posts, I am just so thrilled about playing with Lowell.* Given that dude's got a history of looking scummy, I don't think he's the right lynch today. But his meta definitely sounds like someone who can be scum and try to brush his scummy behavior off as Lowell being Lowell.
*Sarcasm, y'all.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Give him a day. don_johnson says he lurks, so let's try to prevent that.TDC wrote:
So? Do you want to lynch him tomorrow if he plays to his meta? If he doesn't?Wdjat wrote:But his meta definitely sounds like someone who can be scum and try to brush his scummy behavior off as Lowell being Lowell.
Lowell, what do you think of the nessarae56 situation?mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
So when you mentioned that Lowell would come under suspicion that had more to do with everyone else in the thread than it had to do with Lowell?semioldguy wrote:The initial Lowell conversation arose because I thought it might have been possible for TDC to have placed his vote on Lowell knowing that it might be easy to get votes in a game that appeared to have a lot of newer players (or accounts at least).
I don't think Lowell is a bad player.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Any thoughts on the read she had? I mean, there's nothing else to talk about in regards to nessarae56.ConfidAnon wrote:
Not that much has happened except for Nessarae, and I believe she was just a new player who felt overwhelmed, although it's awkward for me to judge my predecessor like htat.Dry-fit, 78 wrote:@ ConfidAnon: Any thoughts about the game?
If you could lynch one person right now, who would it be and why?mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
I didn't. The original vote on him was random. I haven't seen anyone more deserving of a day 1 lynch yet. I asked Lowell because I wanted to engage him in the thread. It guess it kinda worked? His response is not what I expected and boy is it scummy.TDC wrote:
They're useless, I get that.Wdjat wrote:
That's right. I mean, look at his posts.TDC wrote:Wdjat: I take it you're fine with where the SerRose wagon is going, then?
I was asking because I don't remember you expressing particular suspicion on him before so asking Lowell to supply some because he set the L-1 vote seemed a bit off.
His lurking is more anti-town than it is scummy. His second and fourth posts are pretty sketchy, though. That's a 50% hit rate, so I'll place him at a 5.TDC wrote:Could everyone on the SerRose wagon (and Lowell) tell me where they see him on a 1-10 scale from "anti-town" to "scummy"?mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Bleh, you'd think I would notice this after SerRose had no knowledge of how voting worked. I don't want to lynch him today.TDC wrote:Just checking: You guys are all aware that his total post count and his post count in this game are identical, right?
unvote
Looking at the other folks in the game, I'm not too keen on the way Sleepless Assassin was leaning on ConfidAnon to speculate on nessarae56's alignment. Claiming this speculation wouldn't be awkward is pretty disingenuous. It wouldn't be hard to turn anything ConfidAnon said on the subject into a reason to vote for him. By this logic, Lowell's reason's for voting ConfidAnon aren't great either, but Lowell's been kinda all over the place. Sleepless Assassin's focus on a single bad piece of logic is scummier to me.
vote: Sleepless Assassinmecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Part of the Sleepless Assassin over Lowell vote has to do with the context of Lowell's play and what other people have said about him. His posting style is consistent with someone who doesn't post often enough and doesn't read closely enough when he does post, so him being all over the place means less to me coming from him.semioldguy wrote:@wdjat
Why is focusing on single piece of bad logic scummier to you than Lowell's being all over the place? If anything, I find the tunneling on bad logic not to be a tell if the poster does not see the bad logic behind his line of inquiry and currently get a feeling of disinterested town from Sleepless Assassin.
Sleepless Assassin's line of questioning to ConfidAnon looks like he's just trying to turn nessarae56's confused posts into a scum read on ConfidAnon so he has an excuse to lynch him. By trying to force ConfidAnon into making that read, he setting himself up to avoid responsibility if ConfidAnon turns up town. I agree that flawed logic isn't a scumtell by itself, but this post where he responds to that flaw being pointed out with more pressure pushes my read from stupid to scummy.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Given your suspicion of nessarae56, what did you hope to gain by having ConidAnon speculate on the scumminess of nessarae56's play?Sleepless Assassin wrote:
(Bolding mine) Actually, my initial suspicion came from Nessa, who Confid replaced. Confid just hasn't looked town enough for me to forget how scummy Nessa was and there's even some points against Confid himself.Wdjat wrote: Looking at the other folks in the game, I'm not too keen on the way Sleepless Assassin was leaning on ConfidAnon to speculate on nessarae56's alignment. Claiming this speculation wouldn't be awkward is pretty disingenuous. It wouldn't be hard to turn anything ConfidAnon said on the subject into a reason to vote for him. By this logic, Lowell's reason's for voting ConfidAnon aren't great either, but Lowell's been kinda all over the place.Sleepless Assassin's focus on a single bad piece of logic is scummier to me.
vote: Sleepless Assassinmecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
I mean there's only so much to be about nessarae56's play. And this post in particular reads like someone who already knows what conclusion they want to draw.TDC wrote:
I would probably have made that post had it not already been there. CA's awkwardness towards his former self was certainly good enough to poke into at that early point.Wdjat wrote:Sleepless Assassin's line of questioning to ConfidAnon looks like he's just trying to turn nessarae56's confused posts into a scum read on ConfidAnon so he has an excuse to lynch him. By trying to force ConfidAnon into making that read, he setting himself up to avoid responsibility if ConfidAnon turns up town. I agree that flawed logic isn't a scumtell by itself, but this post where he responds to that flaw being pointed out with more pressure pushes my read from stupid to scummy.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Man, I saw nessarae56 as mostly nonsensical. That pressure from me was me trying to be nice. I promise. I don't share your scum read on her.Sleepless Assassin wrote:
Oh, no, confusion isn't the case on Nessa at all. Read up in this post and maybe you'll see what I was looking at.Wdjat wrote: Sleepless Assassin's line of questioning to ConfidAnon looks like he's just trying to turn nessarae56's confused posts into a scum read on ConfidAnon so he has an excuse to lynch him.
And if you want to call scummy actions excuses, then yes, I'll find excuses to lynch anyone who is scummy.
He did eventually. It looks like it was a matter of asking the right way, maybe. Now the fact that he immediately started talking about nessarae56's alignment could be telling. I'll give you that, but your line of questioning wasn't "Why are you so worried about your alignment that you mention it first thing?" It was "Why don't you do that awkward thing that is clearly awkward and damning to you?"Sleepless Assassin wrote:
He doesn't have to make the read, but just being able to look at her posts and give us an opinion of her play shouldn't be that hard.Wdjat wrote:By trying to force ConfidAnon into making that read, he setting himself up to avoid responsibility if ConfidAnon turns up town.
This was pretty clear to me so I'm not sure how it wasn't to you. Maybe flawed logic is not the term? Your response to it reads like willful ignorance.Sleepless Assassin wrote:
I don't think my logic is flawed at all.Wdjat wrote:I agree that flawed logic isn't a scumtell by itself, but this post where he responds to that flaw being pointed out with more pressure pushes my read from stupid to scummy.
So your goal in this post was not to get ConfidAnon to talk about it?Sleepless Assassin wrote:
Nothing. I didn't ask him to. Someone else did and his response caught my eye.Wdjat wrote:Given your suspicion of nessarae56, what did you hope to gain by having ConidAnon speculate on the scumminess of nessarae56's play?mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Man I sure did. SerRose has no history, but he also seems to have no clue so I value scumtells from him lower.semioldguy wrote:
For reasons previously stated. Additionally post 118 seems disingenuous to me. It makes little sense to me that wdjat is stamping the okay for wanting anti-town players for living until tomorrow. His not wanting to lynch SerRose or Lowell based on what I feel are likely horrible reasons. It looks to me like he is trying to keep some easy targets alive regardless of whether they are scummy or not. He doesn't give a suitable explanation for why they might be town or that we shouldn't lynch them.Dry-fit wrote:
Care to elaborate on this now?semioldguy wrote:Wdjat is currently the next best lynch after SerRose in my opinion.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Firstly, @Bio Hazard: is a non-plussed face. There is no suspicion there.
But we're here to talk about suspicions. Bio Hazard's case against Dry-fit is pretty lame, but I think this is more telling about Bio Hazard than it is about dry-fit. That last "agree to disagree" comment was pretty much the worst.
I'm not too happy with the was semioldguy is jumping to Dry-fit's defense either. Either he's falling prey to some buddying or he's doing some buddying of his own. I suspect it's the former.
Given Bio Hazard's latest posts, I'll agree to him as the best lynch right now. I want Lowell to get his opinions in thread before the hammer falls, though.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
It seems to me like this was important to your read on Dry-fit. You don't want to distract us with that?Bio Hazard wrote:
I'm just saying we disagree about that "tell" and a huge theory debate probably isn't going to help anyone here.Wdjat wrote:But we're here to talk about suspicions. Bio Hazard's case against Dry-fit is pretty lame, but I think this is more telling about Bio Hazard than it is about dry-fit. That last "agree to disagree" comment was pretty much the worst.
Because I think Dry-fit is scummier than semioldguy?Bio Hazard wrote:
Why's that?wdjat wrote:I'm not too happy with the was semioldguy is jumping to Dry-fit's defense either. Either he's falling prey to some buddying or he's doing some buddying of his own. I suspect it's the former.
I mean, your first posts were pretty freakin bad.Bio Hazard wrote:
I didn't see you express much suspicion of my replacee. A couple posts is enough for a lynch for you?wdjat wrote:Given Bio Hazard's latest posts, I'll agree to him as the best lynch right now. I want Lowell to get his opinions in thread before the hammer falls, though.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
My definition of buddying implies people of opposing alignments. That is, you get into someone's good graces to deferring to them or defending them when they don't need it to win them over to your side. So I do not think that a Dry-fit/semioldguy team is a possibility.don_johnson wrote:i guess what's odd to me is that wdjat is implying that dry-fit might be scum with bio,andthat dry-fit might be scum with you(though he clearly favors scum with bio). it seems like the speculation of a player who thinks dry-fit is scum, and yet votes elsewhere(popular bandwagon). the post implies(imo) that wdjat has a stronger scum read on dry than on bio(though he obviously attempts to say different.) my contention here would be that this would be an awfully convenient distancing ploy for a dry-fit/wdjat scum team. i know i know, scum teams on day 1 is just speculation, but the behavior seems odd as well coming from a townie. if bio flips town, wdjat clears himself of responsibility for pursuing dry(arguably his stronger scum read) based on his pairing. honestly it makes menotwant to lynch bio. i'll have to think on this a bit more...mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Man, I am not liking the way Regfan starts out this day. The way he leans on his town read of semioldguy looks sketchy and the way he's tunneling on Dry-fit looks even worse. The whole outing power roles could be dismissed as being eager, but this wording really bugs me:
It's drawing this line in the sand where power roles that don't expose themselves are not helping the town.Regfan wrote:Yes, I'm used to EpicMafia.com where power-roles come out fairly early, share their information andhelp us catch the mafia.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
It's sketchy for the same reasons why Dry-fit having his town read on Bio Hazard is sketchy. You're trying to get town cred by showing off how right you were about your town read on a dead player. And speaking of Dry-fit's town read on Bio Hazard, I don't see that given his last post before the lynch where he calls Bio Hazard one of his top suspects.Regfan wrote:So you're saying that myself getting a town read on semi the guy who was helping us the most and when seeing him die being shocked that the jailer didn't jail him is scummy? I'd like you to elaborate on how you can even believe this.
What I don't get is how you were able to be so confident at the start of the day today. Dry-fit was pretty much absent around the time of the lynch. To talk about how "haven't seen anything to disprove my suspicions" in your first post when there's nothing at all to is pretty disingenuous.Regfan wrote:Yes, I do have a sense of tunnel vision on against Dry, but that is because I'm quite confident in him being mafia.
This isn't about whether or not the things you said are right. Yes, guilty results should be claimed. You're saying obvious things about power roles and trying to get them to claim. The post I quoted really jumps out at me because you connect early claims to finding mafia, implying that not claiming is anti-town. Do you see what I'm saying here? Does anyone?Regfan wrote:If you take a look at all my points about the power-roles, they are all very valid. The best way to proceed today would be if our tracker does have a guilty, and how does suggesting they come out if they have one be suspicious. It's the best course of action, I'm not here saying 'TRACKER CLAIM, TRACKER WHERE ARE YOU'. I'm simply stating under what circumstances I believe it is in our best interest for the tracker to claim. If you wish to refute these circumstances, I would love to hear it otherwise I'd like you to explain yourself in regards to how my past-experience at epic mafia has anything to do with 'not helping the town'.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Sleepless Assassin's play today isn't giving me warm fuzzy feelings. It reads to me like he's trying to do enough to look like he's participating, but not really committing to the stuff he's saying.don_johnson wrote:wdjat: reads on anyone else?
My gut says Lowell is town. His play play is not that great, but it reads to me like a decent town player trapped in the body of a crappy player.
I've got a town read on Dry-Fit based mostly on Regfan's attack. His posts are a pretty null read to me.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
That's hardly an answer to my question. The posts I see from him, even setting aside the big post he just made, look like he's actually trying to pay attention and is scumhunting when he does. I don't see him as scum making such a big production of needing to catch up.don_johnson wrote:(winks at wdjat)...mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
I don't get that read on Sleepless Assassin at all. Besides having that slap fight with don_johnson and defending that one thing he called ConfidAnon out on, I haven't seen him do anything.Lowell wrote:I get very strong townvibes fromassassinandTDC. The former is harder to explain, but for some reason his total lack of defensiveness impresses me. TDC did well at the end of D1.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
I'm using the same line of reasoning he used when he called Dry-fit scummy. The difference between the two cases is that he actually did it and Dry-fit didn't.don_johnson wrote:306 is wierd. i need to look at that a bit more. you seem to be condeming reg for something dry-fit did as well while actually exhonorating dry-fit from actually doing it. this game is confusing me. i think a reread is in order.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Man, I am not a fan of don_johnson and Sleepless Assassin right now. Both of them leaning on the Regfan lynch based purely on momentum is really scummy. I mean, I get how the votes got there in the first place but the reasoning their both using to encourage that fourth vote. Jeez...mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
So you're going to talk about what we're going to do after Regfan flips town but claim that you're not encouraging a fourth vote? Really? As for the momentum comment, you and Sleepless Assassin are talking about the Regfan lynch like it's an inevitably since he's at L-1.don_johnson wrote:
noones "encouraging" a fourth vote. i explicitly asked that a hammer vote be well explained. i have also suggested to the players who are not happy with this wagon to feel free to work on getting other ones started. not sure what the bolded is supposed to mean. i believe we both independently stated that we don't think moving is a good idea in order to protect town power roles. do you disagree? if so, why?wdjat wrote:Both of them leaning on the Regfan lynch basedpurely on momentumis really scummy. I mean, I get how the votes got there in the first place but the reasoning their both using to encourage that fourth vote.
And this is another example of the momentum thing I'm talking about. This "well I've done my part, you take care of the rest" attitude.don_johnson wrote:
you seem to be heaping the responsibility of "productiveness" solely on me. TDC and wdjat are the ones with an oppurtunity to shift the focus of the day's activities. i do not have a solid reason at this point to move off the wagon of a claimed vanilla whose alignment is questionable.regfan wrote:So, you're saying, you pretty much refuse to change your vote right now. Instead you'd rather just keep the lynch going and then 'Read whats happened when I flip town'? That seems unproductive.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
Given this read, why do you think that Dry-fit is the correct lynch? Wouldn't the situation you're talking about imply that Regfan is found scum?Lowell wrote:Generally, when a wagon stalls, yet no one posts to refute it, and then the game dies for a few days, I assume that wagon is a good one being derailed by scum hoping to inertia themselves out of a teammate's lynch. I'll assume that's what's happening here. Dry-fit is the right play.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-