I don't prefer either. Why does it have to be one or the other?PaltryExcuse wrote:@Excedrin: You both RV'd and made questions for all. Do you prefer a RVS or a RQS?
I agree with you. With players you know, you start to gain meta and get wifom'd based on meta, which makes it interesting. That doesn't really happen with unknowns.Mindgamer wrote:Quite the opposite. It's fun to play with people you know. Why? I don't know, that's just the way it is. Counterquestion: Why would it be boring to play with people you know?Mindgamer, why is it boring to play w/people you know?
How does town get information if mafia gets lucky?water_foul wrote:I agree with this and it only does good for the mafia. The mafia knows who isn't mafia so they can kill indiscriminately and the town doesn't get any information out of it except if the mafia got lucky.
Why apologize?McGriddle wrote:My apologies everyone, for some reason every time I tried to reply it sent me back to the home page, not to mention half of the time I couldn't find the game lol.
Best way is an early wagon.farside22 wrote:@Everyone: what is the best way to get out of RVS stage?
my answer: Usually I find something to fight with someone about even something minor.
Here's an example: Why did Excedrin vote for McGriddle for not voting when he didn't post in the game at that point?
Does a random vote have to be logical? What do you think about McGriddle's reaction?
Is disregarding context more of a pro- or anti-town behavior?DiscoRoboto wrote:It's obvious that you are getting scumtells just because you disregard the context. How do you get out of RVS if there's nothing to talk about?