This is pretty wrong. Unless we end up bunching up people together, it gets progressively harder to move people up or down the list the more we do it.SpyreX wrote:Yea its just like complicated voting. Random shoving doesn't hurt anything."
Mini 927: Alabama Correctional Facility - OVER
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
Ok, maybe I just figured out what you mean. Is it that the current shove ranking is only given a value of '1' in weighting against the new shove order? Here's what I mean...DGB in post 26 wrote: Hacker Huck - 7.3Farside22 in post 29 wrote:Hacker Huck 8guess at new shove order wrote:Hacker Huck is now 7.7 - =round((7.3+8)/2,1)SpyreX in post 36 wrote:Hacker Huck 11
That seems like it's pretty easy for one person to really manipulate who gets lynched.guess at new shove order wrote:Hacker Huck is now 9.3 - =round((7.7+11)/2,1)-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
SpyreX, you fail to see the point.
First off, I'm not entirely sure that you're correct so it's not helpful to keep random shoving in case it is an overall average. Secondly, a whole bunch of useless shoving does harm the town because we don't get a good idea of who is scummy. You're arguing that random shoving doesn't put anyone in any danger. Random voting kind of works because it can start wagons. Without that kind of a mechanic, random shoving just fills the thread with noise and we're not really going anywhere with it. That's a pretty crappy way to find scum.-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
Umm, the way you guys are describing the shoving mechanics means that you could still do just that.Super Awesome Mega Pimp! wrote:It definitely absolutely positively is not an overall average. DGB's second shove count proves this beyond all doubt: that count is the mean of Minineko's, Spyre's and my first shoves, and Elli's second. It doesn't take Elli's first shove into account at all. (Not to mention the fact that it would be a really bad modding decision to make it an overall average, since I could just shove you to 12 and copy and paste it ten million times and you wouldn't be able to do anything about it, except shove me to 12 ten million and one times. )
So DGB's latest line ranking (i.e. vote count) becomes the single data point. Then any shoves that follow become data points in calculating the average for the next ranking posted by DGB. All that means is if you shove 12M times after a line ranking, your data points would overwhelm all others and essentially become the new average. I know that if I'm at the bottom as we approach deadline, I'll be looking to make 12M posts with me at #1.
Or is it that each person's most recent shove is the only one that contributes to the new average?
All of your estimated rankings are nice and all, but we still haven't received any confirmation from the mod that you guys are right.
Lets try doing some scumhunting, rather than filling pages with random shoves and setup discussion.
Hey Cobalt, why did you choose to daykill (or pretend to daykill) SpyreX?-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
If I thought it were blatantly fake, I wouldn't have asked about it. Even Spyrex seemed to have some doubts about.Ellibereth wrote:Anywayz, Hacker, how is asking Cobalt about a blatantly fake daykill scumhunting?
I honestly don't see how we're getting anywhere with all of this random shoving. It appears to have hurt me now, because I haven't been pushing myself up to the number one slot, so I'm right near the bottom.-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
I think I just had a moment of clarity.
So is the shove order just the simple average of each person's most recent shoving action. I was just making this way more complicated than it is.
So the impact of a person shoving is not so much the order of their shove, but the relative change from their previous shove order. I imagine that most people focus on their top and bottom two or three, so getting a lot of mid-range rankings likely means that there will be no read. This is pretty interesting stuff, but I still don't think that all this random shoving is doing us any good.
Ellibereth and Kitten - why do you have SpyreX so high in your order?-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
My comments were directed toward truly random shoving - no reasons at all. I was trying to place Cobalt at the end of the line and me at the beginning of the line based on my suspicions. Since I'm on the fence about most everyone else, I was just trying to "normalize" the order by inverting the current ratio. I'm most likely not going to have a specific reason for why I chose to locate each person in their particular slot.Jahudo wrote:HackerHuck 10 - Is vocal against random shoves, but most of his shoves on post 96 have no reason. Kinda scummy.
This type of "voting" can make it easier for scum to manipulate positions, so I suggest that we evaluate where a person ends up in the average after someones shove, not so much where they put that person in line.-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
Taken in context, you should have understood what I meant. I will have reasons for some of my votes, but not all of them.Jahudo wrote:
Even the scum slots? 1-7/8/9 I can understand, but not 10/11/12.HackerHuck wrote:I'm most likely not going to have a specific reason for why I chose to locate each person in their particular slot.
How is using my power to help a specific group of people any different from anyone elses shoves? By bunching everyone in the middle I'm not sure about in the middle, it makes it easier to move someone further up or down if I decide whether they're scum or town.Jahudo wrote:
This doesn't feel right. Who does that invert shoving help? There can't be a lynch until the end of two weeks. If you are truly on the fence about everyone else, why are you using your own power to help a specific group of people?HackerHuck wrote:Since I'm on the fence about most everyone else, I was just trying to "normalize" the order by inverting the current ratio.
I think you need to look at these shoves as a form of consensus lynching. Basically everyone is coming up with their ranked scum list and whomever is deemed scummiest by the most people should rank near the bottom. It's very clear when you only do that with maybe three or four potential scum, but when you look at the entire town, it can be easier to fall near the bottom even without being the "scummiest". Look at Goofball's excel sheet in post 104. Minineko doesn't even land in the bottom three, yet three people have her ranked at the very bottom of their lists. That's more 12s than anyone else has. Looking at my votes, if Grimmy just changes my rank from a 5 to an 8, I would then be at the bottom of the list. That's how scum can influence these things without being obvious.-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
^^^ Ridiculously Scummy post now.Ellibereth wrote:
^^^ Ridiculously Scummy post now.HackerHuck wrote:
He also paraphrased your comment on me. Or if it wasn't yours, it was someone elses.Jahudo wrote:Pwnman, can you respond to post 152?
I'm not much liking Mega Pimp and SpyreX on the last couple of pages. Cobalt and pwnman seem OK to me
Who would say that pwnman looked "OK" when he was acting irrational and absolutely ridiculous? Oh yeah, that's right! Scum, who would know he was town.
Reshoving.
Who would say that pwnman was scum without a second thought when he claimed? Oh yeah, that's right! Scum, who would know he was town, but wouldn't recognize anything from his claim.-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
Well, I actually had voted you at 12 for your fake daykill. I did change my mind, but should have reshoved. If you recall from reading my posts, my post order was (except for you and me) in reverse order of the rankings at that time. I've actually softened on SAMP as well. I'd prefer to knock off either Ellibereth or SpyreX.Cobalt wrote:
He's kinda lurky.11. HackerHuck (the one reason you stated was lurking, but Id like to hear more reasons than that)
Also, in his last shove order on the 19th, he rates SAMP at 3, me at 11, spyre at 10. Then two days later he says he finds me OK and SAMP scummy. Without reshoving. Looks to me like he wants to weigh down people without needing to answer for suspecting them. Also reacted poorly to my fake daykill.
Shove:
1. UncertainKitten - 9
2. Minineko - 5
3. Ellibereth - 11
4. Jahudo - 8
5. SpyreX - 10
6. Max - 2
7. farside22 - 6
8. HackerHuck - 1
9. Super Awesome Mega Pimp! - 4
10. Cobalt - 3
11. Grimmy - 7
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
Ellibereth's case on me is that I'm scummy for recognising that pwnman had the same role that I do.
Shove:I'm only moving Minineko and SAMP down to try and save my own skin.
1. Slicey - 4
2. Minineko - 11
3. Ellibereth - 9
4. Jahudo - 7
5. SpyreX - 8
6. Max - 2
7. farside22 - 5
8. HackerHuck - 1
9. Super Awesome Mega Pimp! - 10
10. Cobalt - 3
11. Grimmy - 6
-
-
HackerHuck Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: July 26, 2006
- Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver
I never said it was. I think I explained why I felt pwnman was town. In fact, you allude to a similar reason at the beginning of this same post.farside22 wrote:HackerHuck - post 171 why would you think someone who is paraphrasing what another player said is okay?farside22 wrote:Slicey/ UncertainKitten - post 203 for UK comes dangerously close to OMGUS. If I see a PM from a player and I reconize what it says in my PM why would I assume scum has that as it's safe claim?
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.