Mini 928 - Bloodlust Mafia Remix - Over!

[Dr.Cyanide]

/confirm-while eating chicken nibbles.

[Dr.Cyanide]

@Civil Scum: I have no relation to Sir Cyanide. Nor do I condone his sexist ideals (read one of his games, was shocked to say the least).

On a lighter matter, look out for McZombie, she seems to be infected by something.

[Dr.Cyanide]

I see your McZombie and I raise you one toaster oven.

Don't get on the claimbus, they will see through your $2 disguise.

Vote: Concerned

because hes not concerned enough yet.

[Dr.Cyanide]

Sorry, for inactivity. Was working on a vote analysis for another game. Nachomamm8, your prods are awesome.

First of all.

Unvote

Secondly, attack, defend- draw relative conclusions, mislynch. Everyones going to be jumping to conclusions D1. Maybe we should try something else.

[Dr.Cyanide]

Why do you assume that the conclusions we draw will result in a mislynch? And what else do you suggest?

I think its too early in the game to be closeminded. In fact, I don't see the point in being closeminded ingame fullstop. We're supposed to be scum-hunting, not attacking anything we can find, diluting the situation further. This was a weak-based argument that is just cluttering up the thread.

[Dr.Cyanide]

As for what I suggest, I'm not a fan of RQS, but it's a start.

[Dr.Cyanide]

Wow. Way to go trying to put words in my mouth. What the hell is your problem? What are you overcompensating for? Freaking out a bit there? This is a game. I don't see championship in the title anywhere.

Now, I wasn't defending fifi insofar as commenting on what I've seen in too many games. Excuse me for generalizing. No, don't excuse me, excuse yourself. You're both defending a weak argument like this is the best lynch candidate we have. We have hardly started yet.

I attribute these arguments to misunderstanding and overdefensiveness, I'm looking for better reasons to lynch possible-scum than that.

Also, the way you're misinterpretting all I have said/not said doesn't look too good for yourselves either.

[Dr.Cyanide]

You said everyone involved in the discussion around an early BW is innocent, not just the person in the crosshairs.

Where did I say this?

I agree with civil that this is utter BS. I don't see why your original pattern; attack, defend - draw conclusions" has to result in a mislynch at all, conclusions need to be reached and opinions need to be formed if we're going to lynch correctly.

Early bandwagons, hypothetically

led by scum

will obviously result in this. The fact that all three of you can call my opinion bullshit while misrepresenting it looks like you're trying too hard to make me look like scum. All I did was give a quick sentence that I obviously should have expanded on, of what I've seen in my last two games.

I yawn in your collective general direction.

To digress from issues here (like lynching fifi), we still lost. Just my opinion maybe, but I'd just suggest keeping your weak/strained points to yourself, and sticking with your better ones. It can have a tendency to throw everyone else off by attracting undue attention to your scum-hunting preceedings.

Take your own advice.

Secondly, attack, defend- draw relative conclusions, mislynch. Everyones going to be jumping to conclusions D1. Maybe we should try something else.

How does this not make sense? How about I make myself a bit clearer. Talk. RVS. Talk. Opinions of other players. Attack. Defend. Attack. Defend. Draw relative conclusions led by town/scum. Mislynch.

Are you seriously going to tell me that town lynchs scum D1 all the time? No, I don't think so. And why cluttler up the thread with weak-standing arguments? RQS gets messy, sure, but it'll give us a better idea of the other players in the game than your attack, defend, attack option because obviously people will react differently to that, which you can then turn into suspicion. Plus you're attacking one player, instead of getting a general opinion of the whole group.

It's logically more efficient this way. If you want to continue being anti town, then go right ahead. I'm going to do something else.

[Dr.Cyanide]

unvote
vote: dr cyanide
Fos: fifi
Fos: haylen

Noted.

[Dr.Cyanide]

CivilScum.

Civil/ Scum.
You are only one of these. You are not both.

I'm calling you out.

[Dr.Cyanide]

My reasons for voting CivilScum.

Point One:

unvote
vote: 1fifi
fifi or sauve?

Who's in?

Pushing for bandwagon.

Point Two:

By self voting, i got 3 votes. With another person jumping in, it makes 4, which is a pretty good point to start a serious wagon.

I self voted exactly to create a reaction from someone, so i could get a read, cause this game is starting slowly.

Yeah, I'll believe this in a million years [/sarcasm]

Downgrading a decent scumhunting technique, then attacking the shit out of it.

Next post:

Although now that I think about it, both of those things: joking in that spirit in RVS and saying that it was meant to get reactions because the game was starting slowly doesn't fully contradict what he said about julien voting him for joking.

Lightening his previous post, so as not to seem too inapropriate (looks like he's covering for himself).

It's a big part of why I attacked him all my last game with him. Saying things just to make people look bad. He did it horribly all game and got lynched as a townie.

It's just how he plays I think, no matter how annoying it can get :/ which is pretty god damn annoying.

It really looks like you're doing the exact same thing that you attacked julien for all your last game with him. It looks like you're saying things just to make people look bad. That is how I recieved all your attacks on The1fifi and myself.

Point Three:

As I remember, that lynch was due to a bad statistical analysis of my interactions wtih somebody else that was supported by scum, plus a drunken hammer. Meanwhile, that day, I had managed to be suspicious of both scum, remember?

Discussing a previous game, he puts across that his suspicions were correct, insinuating that his suspicions should be trusted here.

Suggest something productive otherwise quit defending fifi.

I hadn't even mentioned The1fifi. Assumption or misleading misinterpretation.

Dr cyanide, there are things to look at here, it's troubling to hear you suggest that we abandon it. We still have people to hear from, and I've got a couple other bad vibes, and it's early. But to say we should ignore all of this and do what is, I TOTALLY agree, going BACKWARDS, is, well, very backwards of you.

I did not say that we should abandon it, I suggested we/others should do something else/ something more productive than attacking one player over a weak argument that didn't seem to be going anywhere.

This is what I mean by Putting Words In My Mouth.

So far, dr cyanide, your defens of fifi amounts to: "Early cases are never right and never hit scum...it's ALWAYS a later one, the third or fourth..."

Awesomely huge assumption.

Words in your mouth? Okay wait let me correct myself. You said everyone involved in the discussion around an early BW is innocent, not just the person in the crosshairs. Was that better?

Yet again, I did not say this, still trying to put words in my mouth. Even worse, when I ask CivilScum where I said this in post 132 he responds by voting for me.

Civils Scum, about your discussion with Cyanide, i definetely think you are right.

Trying to warm up the guy that was just attacking you. Nice.

I also dislike how you made all these criticisms and then offered no alternative. You're talking about "looking everywhere" and "keeping an open mind" without the slightest inclination to do so. Besides your vaguest of ideas about an RQS stage you didn't initiate.

I've been busy r/l. I haven't been giving this game 100%. Excuse me.

"VOTE : Dr Cyanide
I agree with Civil completely, I'd add more to the case but whenever I feel like I have something to add Dr Cyanide says it. He's not even trying to defend himself anymore, trying to get the game back on to RVS tracks... wtf?? "

Nice. You're basing your assumptions on Civils assumptions. It's the blind leading the blind.


Something tells me you attack everything you don't understand, don't you CivilScum.

[Dr.Cyanide]

I'm an idiot.

Sorry Civil, I took your attacks as over-compensating scum, when I should have realized crazy assed paraniod town (hopefully.)

Vote: Concerned.

(yeah, you should be)

Half the point of being a nutcase was to see who would attack the shit out of it. Terrible scum-hunting technique, I know. I'm new, sue me.

Or could that be a double-play?

[Dr.Cyanide]

Where is the design meant to be in acting like a nutcase?

"Secondly, attack, defend- draw relative conclusions, mislynch. Everyones going to be jumping to conclusions D1. Maybe we should try something else."
This was not supposed to sound as terribly stupid as everyone recieved it, should have expanded on it, but I was in a hurry.

As for suggesting RQS, I realize that was stupid too, I just couldn't think of anything else at the time.

"What the hell is your problem? What are you overcompensating for? Freaking out a bit there?"
As for this, I'm still new, bad excuse, but it's true. I noticed I've done this in a few of my games, and entertainingly, am being pulled up about it in this one and another, at the same time.

"I'm calling you out"- to CivilScum. Seeing how he would react to me suggesting I knew he was scum. Well, that didn't work out so well, but I'm still suspicious.

Plus the general asshattery from CS' direction made it hard to be bothered, and I wanted to quit- but I figured, I'm going to run into people like him on here anyway, so why just quit when I can play, have fun, and do a decent job at learning how to play.

Meh, anyway.

[Dr.Cyanide]

"- Cyanide who's scum at this point? "

Concerned has my suspicions, as well as CivilScum. Don't like Bv' lurking. Looking into everyone else at the moment.

Post more substantial content soon.

[Dr.Cyanide]

McZombie with her 3 posts.
What's up with that?

[Dr.Cyanide]

Right, so I'm obv.scum just because I still suspect you? How is that not OMGUS?

If you are scum, you both know I'm town- so aiming for a mislynch with the reasoning of my acting 'crazy'.etc. Or Civil isn't scum as whoever had meta on him says this is what he's like as town, but the way Concerned jumped on it looks scummy to me.

[Dr.Cyanide]

@Sandman, not too sure on the prod timelimits, I'll have to check for you.

Also, Fifi, if you are cult leader, recruit me and sandman so we can have a Newbie 911 cult, 'cause that would be awesome.