Shrug, I liked his responses to the questions he was asked, though I would still like to see him answer Locke's post like you mentioned. I think what he said is being misconstrued. The only thing that keeps me suspicious of him is Moai's defense, but I think that point should start with a Moai lynch.Col.Cathart wrote:And now, let me ask you a question - do you still think, RC is 'either contradicting himself at worst or at the very best back-pedaling hard'?
I find it extremely interesting, you jumped that wagon at first, to now you hopped off it to accuse someone who threw a first vote on it (while accusing me of 'opportunistic jump' on that wagon, which is outright bullshit).
Bonus 'LOL' points for you actually being one of those three people mentioned by Sotty.
Why is it interesting? I'll admit I made a mistake, I didn't check who voted when before making the post, but if you want to call me scum for it just do it, don't beat around the bush. Alluding to things being 'interesting' or whatever else just muddles the pond when people are rereading your posts. I'm probably guilty of this as well, but it's a personal goal to cut down on the 'mysterious ways' style of playing.
What's a 'LOL point?'
Lol I didn't ignore it, except when I don't have time to make posts I don't 'check in' with a useless post, I'd rather post a quickie with the thought on top in my mind. I actually had a response worked out but my laptop died before I could finish so I had to start from scratch now that I got home from my friends house.charter wrote:My take on the RC issue. I think he was saying we shouldn't suspect people based on Sotty's daykill, not that we shouldn't suspect people she mentioned. Was pretty confusing, I had to reread his post like three times to figure it out.
Shotty's vote in 88 is scummy as hell. He votes Cathart claiming Cathart's vote on RC was opportunistic when Cathart voted RC first, and Shotty himself later voted RC. Cathart already covered this. Shotty is 2/2 on terrible votes, which I find to be the threshhold for scum, so I'll be backing this lynch the rest of the day.TownCathart wrote:And now, let me ask you a question - do you still think, RC is 'either contradicting himself at worst or at the very best back-pedaling hard'?
I find it extremely interesting, you jumped that wagon at first, to now you hopped off it to accuse someone who threw a first vote on it (while accusing me of 'opportunistic jump' on that wagon, which is outright bullshit).
Bonus 'LOL' points for you actually being one of those three people mentioned by Sotty.Ignoring Cathart's response to your vote on him is another scumfession from Shotty. Here's the active lurking I'm talking about.Shotty wrote: charters picked me to tunnel on for this game, yay!There's a difference between posting about not having time and posting "lol charter tunnel".Shotty wrote:Also his active lurking accusations from before are now tinted with irony.
Let's start the gears on a Shotty lynch, folks.
Remember last time you tunneled on me?
Why is my mistake so scummy? In mafia you hunt for the motivation behind the idea, what would I stand to gain by making up something so stupendously easy to check on that Col. would obviously protest if I were seriously trying to lead a mislynch as scum?
My main points were about Col.'s ideas about lynching RC based on Moai's actions which is fallacious in my opinion and is a scum tactic to lead a mislynch and potentially give credence to a partner by associating them with a mislynched townie.