Because I know McGriddle is useless. Useless players should be lynched by town regardless of alignment, just because scum would want to leave them alive until endgame.Iecerint wrote:Useless is just as hard to get a read on as the inactives. Why do you prefer the players you listed to the useless one?
Cobalt wrote:I suddenly want JR or Almaster to burn.
I agree. The closest thing we have to a confirmed town atm is AlmasterGM.bv310 wrote:The odds of this game having a daykilling scum or SK is extremely unlikely.
So we judge him on your meta?Cobalt wrote:I was daykilling scum in super upick and played just like almaster is doing now.
Sure, but because we're one person less, it also takes one less to hammer.Fate wrote:Seacore was voting F1f1, so uh, no he's not at L-1.
Just a reminder, shouldn't EVERYONE use a vote before we hammer?Fate wrote:I'm also for lynching Almaster straight up instead of having him burn, just because we'll likely have another dead townie on his hands tomorrow.
+1popsofctown wrote:Bad plan is bad. Almaster shouldn't be the one to burn.
Fate wrote:Also I think we should get off the f1f1 wagon.
Fate wrote:ecause I know McGriddle is useless. Useless players should be lynched by town regardless of alignment...
The game still hasn't really taken off yet, it's all about how to bend the rules to make sure there are no night kills, which, to me, defeats the purpose of being in a theme game, but that's just my opinion. You want me lynched based off active confusion, I don't want t post because I don't want to confuse everyone who is involved with the conversation, because then I would get even more confused. Once we actually have real accusations I will be here to join in or defend myself against them.Fate wrote:Meh, I don't like leaving a trigger happy vig alive, because if he "lives for too long" (either because scum let him live for WIFOM or he is scum) then it gets to the point where we say:
"Ok, lynch him now!" and then he goes.
"BWHAHAH YOURE GOING DOWN WITH ME!" and we end up at lylo the next day or something.
I have a meta on Mcgriddle, he's useless. He's a better lynch candidate tomorrow (barring no CP evidence) than he is to burn. One of the inactive should burn though, because I can't get a read on them otherwise.
Such as fqgghaweghqdas, Cruciare, or bv130
Burn-inv - iecerit or whateverpopsofctown wrote:It's ok if he'll phase in when scumhunting starts, Iec
What I need from everyone in the thread now, whether you understand burning or not
1. Declaration of who you think should be investigated today, as if a sane cop were doing it.
2. Declaration of who you think should be lynched today. (fifi doesn't represent "sunk" votes, the people who voted him can be countned has burn 1 and then other players can lynch someone else who won the vote. So don't worry about that factor, ftr)
I personally think Fifi is useless though. My vote.
1. Burn-investigate JR
2. Lynch fifi
And no voting until the setup wizards decide how
Actually, you put him outside of the category for certain. Otherwise it would be "or any other of the lurkers".Iecerint wrote:I wasn't putting you in the category, necessarily.