Nik wrote:I'm totally serious about that incant, too. Think how I accused Sotty7, Kreriov, and Col.Cathart in Picking Simplicity, for those of you who have read it. That's the same thing as this here.
I don't know what this means and I don't plan to read this game. Do tell.
Nik wrote:VP wrote:But it's still there regardless. I don't think it's going to make amazingly more likely to be lynched, but facts are facts, right? I dunno, I just think it was a bit of an impetuous decision (though that doesn't necessarily say anything about alignment I guess).
Reaching! If it has nothing to do with alignment, why bother mentioning it?
Necessarily being the operative word. What do you think of Spy's reasoning for double voting Sotty at that time?
MO wrote:I'm not a huge fan of meta, no, because I do believe people's playstyles change over time.
Sure, definitely. However, what I think is important in this case is that Serial was self supplying this meta to back up his play in this game. It's not me going out there hand picking examples to prove my point. I think if you look at the games he chose, you'll see that the argument he is making (that he would tunnel as town) does not hold water in comparison to this game.
MO wrote:Also tunneling on him about tunneling is irony++.
Oh come on now, I have done plenty of questioning and looking around this game, but when I think I found scum I have to do my best to prove my point.
Spyrex wrote:And I'm not vinegary, sheesh. POWERFUL WIZARDS exist outside the realm of normal taste-descriptors.
Umami?
I have input on the double voter business at a later date when I have figured a few things out in my head.