Ok reread Cruelty somewhat.
My main focus was on dj's mention of him switching to Sir Chris, in regards to this quote:
don_johnson wrote:most likely scenario is 3 scum. in 3 scum you are most likely guaranteed at least one power role. power roles generally can't take action and kill in the same night. which means scum team members have a 66% chance of moving at night. given the fact that cruelty claims to have gotten no movement on SC night 2, why so willing to lynch him on day 3? just seems like it goes against the odds.
This supposedly occurs on Post 918 and 948. Yet neither post contains a vote, only a single unvote (off of dj? Unsure.)
The quote by don_johnson made logical sense to me as it is in theory correct. Yet if you review Cruelty's interactions on Day 3, his main focus was on getting Heilo lynched, and only Post 918 and 948 focused on Sir Chris.
I found that both of these posts were simply just reviewing Sir Chris and looking for inconsistency in his play, anything that stood out. Cruelty specifically stated that he was not gunning for a Sir Chris lynch, and also did not at any point in these posts vote Sir Chris. He stated he was looking for connections between myself and Sir Chris, trying to get a clear read. This effectively negates that entire section of don_johnson's position against cruelty.
As such, I find cruelty's claim a bit more believable, and I'm not ready to support a cruelty lynch unless more evidence comes up. I would also like some comment from MME.
Don_johnson, while rereading Day 3 I remembered you were strongly supporting the position that Sir Chris was scum.
Why no pressing against Sir Chris today? Do you still hold anything against him?
I know we have been focusing on the claims today, but I would like to see if your opinion still holds, and if so, why are you not pressing him?