What makes this a policy lynch?Phlight wrote:So this is a policy lynch? You want to lynch him for behavior that you know is not indicative of his alignment? Why didn't you just come out and say so?
Aggressive behavior, no—I view myself as somebody who engages in this also. Baseless or near-baseless votes, yes.Phlight wrote:1) For Panzerjager, do you believe aggressive behavior and baseless or near-baseless votes are a scumtell (ie, behavior he is more likely to engage in as scum)?
I like people to put their reasons in front of them. As I said, he pushed for my predecessor's claim too early for my tastes. I don't care for Panzerjager's meta (or anybody else's, for that matter) as heavy reliance on it is, in my opinion, a good way to lose.Phlight wrote:1a) If so, this contrasts with your prior experience. Why do you think it's scummy anyway?
Yes.Phlight wrote:1b) If not, do you think he's scum?
Covered in response to 1a.Phlight wrote:1bi) If so, why?
Are you serious? This gives plenty of information to scum, because they'll know who to go for to kill information roles - and as you yourself said, assuming we have a cop(/tracker/watcher) and a doctor is a terrible idea.Phlight wrote:If I have a role that targets, I targeted Trumpet of Doom in the last day/night cycle.
If I have a role that inspects for alignment, I didn't receive a result.
If I have a role that tracks or a role that watches, no one targeted Trumpet of Doom and Trumpet of Doom targetted BridgesAndBaloons.
I would like for everyone to hypoclaim in the above fashion in their next post. Whether you do have a role that targets or not, claim that you do and claim a result. Vigilantes, if any, should consider lying, lest they become obvious. This gives very little information to scum and means that if/when an investigative role dies, we'll have all of their information.
Fixed.Trumpet of Doom wrote:Phlight wrote:If I have a role that targets, I targeted Trumpet of Doom in the last day/night cycle.
If I have a role that inspects for alignment, I didn't receive a result.
If I have a role that tracks or a role that watches, no one targeted Trumpet of Doom and Trumpet of Doom targetted BridgesAndBaloons.
I would like for everyone to hypoclaim in the above fashion in their next post. Whether you do have a role that targets or not, claim that you do and claim a result. Vigilantes, if any, should consider lying, lest they become obvious. This gives very little information to scum and means that if/when an investigative role dies, we'll have all of their information.If I have a role that targets, I targeted [X] in the last day/night cycle.
If have a role that inspects for an alignment, [X is guilty/X is not guilty/I didn't receive a result.
If I have a role that tracks or a role that watches, [Y] targeted [X] and [X] targeted [Z].
I can clearly see why this plan makes sense, Phlight! Since everyone is hypoclaiming, the scum won't know who to kill!
I don't get why people (especially you) think it is so strange that I believed you - country mouse and city mouse make sense to be masons, if it had been a story without such an obvious relationship then I would have been dubious. If you are scum then it means that you either went through the little golden books and found country mouse and city mouse, hoping nobody else would have it, or you ARE country mouse and your scumbuddy is city mouse, which would be the dumbest claim ever because if your scumbuddy is lynched and comes up as city mouse, you're screwed. The first scenario is possible I guess, but involves a fair bit of luck, and is much more of a stretch than if you are telling the truth and you are a mason.StrangerCoug wrote:Time to pursue my other suspect from when I replaced in.
Vote: totallynotmafia
I know what I am, but you were awfully quick to jump off my wagon when all I claimed was my story.
The scum's also clearly power-role hunting. We don't know what the two recently dead are yet, though.
....hang on, hang on. Voting for someone after a hypoclaim result is a lot different than just a hypoclaim rseult by itself. Just want to make sure we're on the same page, otherwise this hypoclaim stuff is stupid.Phlight wrote:Fixed.Trumpet of Doom wrote:Phlight wrote:If I have a role that targets, I targeted Trumpet of Doom in the last day/night cycle.
If I have a role that inspects for alignment, I didn't receive a result.
If I have a role that tracks or a role that watches, no one targeted Trumpet of Doom and Trumpet of Doom targetted BridgesAndBaloons.
I would like for everyone to hypoclaim in the above fashion in their next post. Whether you do have a role that targets or not, claim that you do and claim a result. Vigilantes, if any, should consider lying, lest they become obvious. This gives very little information to scum and means that if/when an investigative role dies, we'll have all of their information.If I have a role that targets, I targeted [X] in the last day/night cycle.
If have a role that inspects for an alignment, [X is guilty/X is not guilty/I didn't receive a result.
If I have a role that tracks or a role that watches, [Y] targeted [X] and [X] targeted [Z].
I can clearly see why this plan makes sense, Phlight! Since everyone is hypoclaiming, the scum won't know who to kill!
Trumpet of Doom doesn't want a hypoclaim because he's scum. Although I didn't claim a result on him that implicates that he's scum (I hypoclaimed one, which is quite different), you can see the way that he absolutely freaked out. That's much more indicative of scum than my hypoclaim results.