Starbuck wrote:What about my case SPECIFICALLY don't you like? Do you care to provide specific examples?Fishythefish wrote:I dislike Starbuck’s case on skyedoc. Basically, everything in it is a nulltell or a pretty weak scumtell (particularly: AtE, overreaction, lack of reads d1, defensiveness, PR softclaim, emotions of all kinds). He makes one good point, that skye hasn’t said much about the dp wagon – although this was more by way of a counter-counter-attack, and feels very much like an afterthought that fitted.
A large portion of Starbuck’s posts are about the kind of things that people often think are scumtells, but actually don’t fit well into a coherent picture of scum (basically, all of the above plus rolefishing-by-asking-people-to-claim [starbuck’s first post]). For me, this makes him likely scum.
What's with your defense of sykedoc when he has already committed so many scummy actions?
I dislike virtually every point in your case. As soon as I have time (next day or so), I'll do a massive wall of your points, with my comments - almost all of which will be "not actually a scumtell".