I'm policy lynching him from now on, because we're never on the same side.
...wait, he's not in this game? Drat.
For being the other person not to confirm his role yet.
You treated xReck seriously. That's what feels off.danakillsu wrote:What? You're telling someone else to do something that you immediately do the opposite of? Whatever. How does it "feel of to you"? That's a pretty sad reason to vote for me, if you aren't still RV'ing.
You treated xReck's post as if he was actually trying to accomplish something with it. In other words, you took it seriously. It was obviously a joke inspired by the escapades of RVS.danakillsu wrote:Absolutely not. I did not treat him seriously. Some of the possibilities were that he did not really want to be lynched (in other words, he wasn't serious). And the possibility that he was trying to confuse us is my number 1.You treated xReck seriously. That's what feels off.
I'm not voting xReck. What were you trying to get at with this vote here?Fate wrote:Vote: Saint Kerrigan for flawed reasoning. xReck is too scummy to be scum.
I know you think he's scum. My question is meant to make you think why he is scum. Tracker's answer is the correct kind of answer I'm looking for. I want to know why it is you're voting Flareonage. By the way, Dana, what isDanakillsu wrote:Because we are convinced that he is scum. If you are essentially asking why we think he's scum, then I don't like that question, because it implies that we haven't already made a case, which we have.
Sorry, I forgot about this.Shrinehme wrote:Oh, nevermind. I see now.
I don't see why it would.SaintKerrigan wrote:But look how quick he is to deny that he treated xReck's questions seriously. Doesn't that feel slightly off to you?
Whydoesit "feel off" to you?
Do you think Scum would more likely post a serious response than they would continue joking in order to prolong the RVS?
Looked newcomertownish in my eyes.