ortolan wrote:and Yos said they were scum but he put them below two other people who I think are town on his list.
I'm not sure why you keep saying that.
After I went back and did a re-read on Almaster that day , I moved him up to one of the top two lynches. I said so at least twice.
As a result of killing Sarag and Almaster town is in a much, much better position. You have to take into account how little scum would want this. As such Hacker and Yos are far and away the best targets. Howard is a horrible target, and he's been attacked by the flipped scum all game.
Mmm. Early in the game, Alamster went back and fourth between attacking you, Sarag, and Howard. Considering that he was obviously distancing from Sarag, I'm not entirely sure what to make of his attacks on Howard.
Later, he switched over to a tunnel on you (which I pointed out looked pretty scummy). He spent a lot of time saying he wanted to kill you.
Still later, he switched over to attacking Mae.
Yeah, I really don't get much from that. It looks like he really wanted you dead; his attacks on Howard, though, dosn't really look any different from his attacks on his scumbuddy Sarag.
Let me look at Sarag in iso now:
-Ambiguas statements on Bogre
-Fos on Drake
-Attack on Drake, Bogre, and "maybe Yos2 or Dragon of Summer" (his post 18)
-Next, attack on Hacker, Drake, Bogre, with minor attack on Drake and me
-After Bogre flips town, repeats that Hacker is his top suspect
-His post 25 is the first time Sarag questions Howard at all. This post still seems more hostile toards Hacker, though. (with his conclusion about Howard just being a question, while his conclusions about Hacker was
Sarag wrote:
Either interpretation has HackerHuck as scum. I can't think of a town motivation for the way he acted, except just a weird fixation on that comment.
-He then repeats his suggestion that Hacker is scum (post 26)
-In post 27, he agrees with my attack against Howard. This is the first time he's really expressed suspision. In the same post, he also repeats that he "can't think of a townie interpretaiton" of Howard's act
-Post 28, after gunbearer said he was likely to shoot Howard, he said he was "happy with a howard shot"
-Post 30, he's "still comfortable with the cases on HowardRoark and HackerHuck"
-Post 31 he repeats that Howard and hacker are his top 2 suspects, with Mae #3
-Post 32, he just says that he "outlined his case agaisnt Howard yesterday", and he repeats that he is suspicious against Hacker. He also defends Almaster in this post, and quesitons my attack on Almaster.
-His last post, when DoS says " why shouldn't I shoot you?" He responds "You could shoot HowardRoark instead." No mention of Hacker in this post.
Ort, I can't really see how you can look at Sarag's posts and come to the conclusion he was attacking Howard more this game then he was attacking Hacker. Can you explain how you came to that conclusion?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie