Again,
@Mod - The first post isn't updated at all. I'm not listed on the front page as a replacement. The latest deaths haven't been recorded. Also, no where in an obvious area is the Day that we are currently on (such as the thread title or the first post).
Heads up, I skimmed through the theorizing and discussion that should be in the Mafia Discussion part of the forums. I've also skipped over everything that farside had to say since I know it came from scum.
On my predecessor, Locke Lamora
I'm not a fan of his casual entrance into the game at
Post 63. I've only played with Locke once or twice, so I don't know if that's a normal thing for him or not. Although, he did ask questions and seemed like he was trying to contribute, but he only has 5 total posts and 4 are game related.
I do agree with his case on Lowell. I feel the same way about him currently.
On KittyMo
I've only played in one prior game with KittyMo, and I don't remember her being this lurky. Is this normal for her?
She says
wants to be in a game with no RVS, and will vote the next person to random vote. Now, I don't think the suggestion is scummy, but her execution of said plan was just a very poor display.
And Nikanor makes an excellent point with:
Nikanor wrote:Except that your reasoning for placing a vote will rely on the RVS's existence.
If she had posted her questions along with her statement of not wanting an RVS, I could definitely see her positively trying to move away from RVS. Without including those questions in her initial post, it reflects rather negatively imho.
KittyMo wrote:Locke Lamora: If I were to self-vote right now, what would your reaction be?
Answering this since it was based towards my role spot.
It would depend on your actions surrounding the self-vote really. I am one of those firm believers that self-voting is a null tell, rather than a scum tell. Your actions surrounding the self vote would them be questioned by me, rather than that actual self vote.
She answers her questions in
Post 27, but I do not feel that many of them are genuine.
For example...
KittyMo wrote:* Who do you want to be lynched first in this game, and why?
Hmmm. Hard question to answer, since only about half of us are here, but I’d choose Lowell, because I don’t like votes without reasoning on page 1 unless they’re early bandwagoning.
Most votes on Page 1 aren't for a reason. So why do you support early bandwagoning (which a good chunk of people find to be scummy) over people random voting?
I don't think you've even stated why you don't like the Random Voting Stage.
KittyMo wrote:* Is it scummy to suggest skipping the RVS?
No. I don’t really like the RVS; it doesn’t seem all that useful.
* If I were to self-vote right now, what would your reaction be?
Well, there’s a reason that I’m not self-voting right now; I don’t see how it would help the town.
Since both of these questions are originally intended to be about your actions and/or possible future actions, it's just very odd in context. You were the one who suggested skipping RVS, and you would be the one to self-vote.
Now you've stated why you don't like RVS, so why isn't it useful?
KittyMo wrote:Zachrulez wrote:See, my thought when I see a question like that is that of a scum player who wants to know what NOT TO DO in a mafia game, a scum player who might be paticularly worried about being caught by a specific player. (You'd have to know my history with Kittymo to fully understand what I'm getting at.)
I pretty much know what you find scummy, Zach, so if that was the reason I was asking, I would ask someone else that question, like someone very experienced (you know about my irrational fear of them, especially when I play as scum xD), or ask Nikanor, because at least on irc, he always seems to catch me as scum, and I am not entirely sure why. But the main point of the question survey was to ask questions relevant to the game at hand, which is why I didn't ask things like "What's your favorite power role: cop, doctor, or vig?" or random game theory that doesn't apply here.
This just feels WIFOM-ish to me, with a bit of backpedaling. If you know what Zach finds scummy, you should have directed another question towards him. But still even if you asked someone else this question, I would find it rather odd as well.
StrangerCoug wrote:KittyMo wrote:Since I apparently fail so much, what better plan would you like to grace us with?
Unvote: yabbaguy
Vote: KittyMo
If one plan for generating discussion fails, try another yourself. Don't ask people to generate discussion for you.
QFT
I'm also not a fan of Kitty's AtE in that quote.
XScorpion wrote:KittyMo wrote:You're asking me to figure out what you should do next for you? o.O
Would you like to explain why you don't want to give any suggestions of what is best for town?
XScorpion wrote:Did you simply start the RQS just to generate discussion, and let the rest of town decide what to do with the results?
Did you ever answer these questions?
KittyMo wrote:If people did continue to RV, I, as I did, would vote the first person to random vote. If no one did RV, I would have chosen to vote for a different reason. Why was this not obvious?
You've been on this site long enough to know that almost 98% of games start with some kind of RVS. So your theorizing about "if no one did RV" doesn't fly with me at all.
You are trying to give yourself an out where there isn't one.
KittyMo wrote:Basically, I want you to explain which of my questions you think someone who is not town would ask. Since you have yet to do that; you've just said that some guy in a game you played with a while back asked scummy questions.
Why are you trying to lead into a discussion that will be a complete distraction from the game?
KittyMo wrote:You seriously have no reason whatsoever to believe I'm town? That's pretty sad.
AtE much?
KittyMo wrote:Until you bring up a point that isn't "I think this is scummy because I think it's scummy and you can't change what I think is scummy," I'm not going to respond to your case anymore because it's a waste of the small amount of time we have before reaching the deadline.
This is what mafia is though. He has brought up many good points (at this point in the game) against you. All you have brought, as far as I can see, in defense is quite a bit of AtE and misrepresentation.
So why are you jumping all over X for his vote on you, rather than anyone else for their votes on you?
KittyMo wrote:Zachrulez wrote:KittyMo wrote:Here's the bottom half of my scumlist. (I tried to order it as best I could, but I keep wanting to reorder it...meh):
MrSuave
Zachrulez
StrangerCoug
XScorpion
Lowell
SCUM
So those closer to the bottom are people you are more suspicious of?
Yup.
Cut off the top half of the list since it's so close to deadline. I'm not really interested in giving scum a who-to-NK list.
But you just did. /sigh
On Zachrulez
Zachrulez wrote:See, my thought when I see a question like that is that of a scum player who wants to know what NOT TO DO in a mafia game, a scum player who might be paticularly worried about being caught by a specific player. (You'd have to know my history with Kittymo to fully understand what I'm getting at.)
QFT
On Lowell
Lowell wrote:unvote, vote zach
. 39 and 41, taken together, rub me the wrong way. 39 is meta and 41 is defensive and meta.
How so?
Lowell wrote:I'd like to see some interest in a zach wagon if folks aren't doing anything other than telling jokes.
Why a Zach wagon?
Lowell wrote:Zachrulez wrote:Is it your position that people who make meta arguments are scummy then?
Yes, basically. If that's pretty much all they do. It's my opinion that being meta is a good way to appear active while not really ruffling any feathers. This is what I see you doing, even in the way you phrased this question.
Where has he done this? Why haven't you provided examples to back up your accusation?
Lowell wrote:because I only have one vote. Zach strikes me as the bigger offender. suave is just plain lurky.
And yet, you still haven't provided a case, only weak accusations without any backup.
Lowell wrote:unvote, vote MrSuave.
Bandwagon. I'll give zach credit for showing up at least. Suave has an attitude on the rare occasions he does participate.
This is a rather opportunistic switch.
Lowell wrote:Or we could come to a consensus and lynch zach.
Still awaiting a case.
Not to mention at the time of this post you are voting for MrSuave and not Zach.
Lowell is reminding me a lot of a game I played in with him as scum. I believe it's Mini 795, but I can't bring up right now since the search function doesn't seem to be working on the forums currently.
On Nikanor
Nikanor wrote:Having an abnormal amount of confidence is a scumtell, farside.
QFT
On XScorpion
Btw, it needs to be said, I like you more when you are scumhunting. You bring valuable info to the table.
XScorpion wrote:KittyMo wrote:I had no school today, so I was waiting around all day for your game to start.
KittyMo wrote:Well, Zach, I was planning on providing another method of discussion, but I had to leave for dance class soon, and didn't have time to come up with one.
You were waiting around all day...but didn't have enough time? What's up with that?
Now I'm one of the biggest advocates about people's real lives because I know mine can get hectic as all hell, it's a WIFOM discussion. We won't know if the game started like 3 hrs prior to her class or 15 minutes prior. I think that this argument is faulty. She even said she had to leave for dance class, which you MIRACULOUSLY left out when you accused her here.
I have found her actions in game are scummy, but I don't think that this is. She came back as soon as she could. Now if she had just waited to make her first post and included her whole plan and her questions all into one post, I think that wouldn't have made her look as a bad. I just don't think you should be holding her commitments within her life against her.
I do agree with other points in your case though, such as
XScorpion wrote:KittyMo wrote:...which is why I didn't ask things like "What's your favorite power role: cop, doctor, or vig?"...
I am suspicious about someone being the first in the thread to mention power roles, even in this context.
& you hit it on the nose here:
XScorpion wrote:The only reason it promoted discussion is because people saw her as suspicious for trying to discourage one of the most common ways to begin discussion.
XScorpion wrote:KittyMo wrote:Which of my questions in particular think are information about town for the scum to use? How would they be more helpful to scum than town?
I don't believe it is very productive to speculate on what scum might or might not say to get information about town.
This.
I do find it odd that X suddenly drops his case and attack on KittyMo and switches to Lowell. I have found Lowell scummy as I read, but it seems like too weird of a switch. I also don't see where a connection is between Lowell and Kitty.
He asks why his "insanely anti-town behavior hasn't warranted a vote". Me, personally, reading at the point I am, I really didn't find XScorpion as anti-town. So I'm wondering why he would go out of his way to point out this behavior or that he's purposely acting in this fashion.
XScorpion wrote:As town, I've found that most lynches on me have actually been lead by scum...go figure.
Welcome to my world.
On MrSuave
He seems to just be adding a lot of fluff to the thread rather than actual scumhunting. I'm just trying to get through the thread right now, but I'm going to be doing an iso on him later on.
He seems a bit to crazed about Nikanor though.
On nhammen
Jumps in the game and automatically names Zach, X and MrSuave as scummiest.
Why? Do you have any cases on them?
At this point nhammen is still very quiet.