All right, I need to break this specific post down.
Seven wrote:More responding...
And yet a lack of scumhunting, I'd assume?
Seven wrote:DRK:
first off, bandwagon much?
DRK provided pretty good reasons for you being scum. His posts don't come off as bandwagoning. Your particular statement here comes off as deflecting.
Seven wrote:Yes, I answered for SP. I don't know when he'll be on next, Cue asked a question so I assume he needs the information to continue discussion. If I have the answer, why should I wait for SP to put it up? I will do this no matter who asks the question to who, if only for the fact that if we have two different answers, then we have two different opinions, and that's two things to go on instead of one. Not sure whats anti-town about that.
Do you understand why this is scummy? Answering for another player makes it seem like you're trying to cover that other player's actions and defend them. Plus, scum could easily answer for each other because they have the same goal and likely the same target.
Seven wrote:I'm really not getting what it is that I'm doing wrong. So far you've mostly accused me of arguing things that I don't agree with... We're supposed to be debating, here. That's how we're going to seek out scum. If you disagree with the things I'm saying, that's one thing... but if you disagree with me for saying them? Hmm...
Oh geez. If you want what you're doing wrong, see this post as well as my previous post.
Seven wrote:I don't need to make him look bad, mate. He's doing that all on his own. I think my arguments against him are pretty solid. Maybe you should address those instead of pointing out that I'm trying to keep up discussion here.
...Sorry did that make you look bad?
Hmm, yes, Cuet's posts are a little... odd... but you're really only making yourself look bad at this point.
Seven wrote:I proscribe to a belief that during a period of lack of conversation one potential solution is to get a nice good bandwagon rolling to see how people react to it.
I did read this but didn't realize that was one of the reasons for voting for me. Understand now.
Yeah, wagons are helpful, nobody can claim that we're in RVS anymore. However, the way you're reacting to it is scummy. BTW, that's really not the main reason people are voting you anymore. It may have started like that, but... :/
Seven wrote:I agree that there isn't much difference between voting or FoSing in RVS, which I've said before. Neither of them hold much weight. I don't think not voting is a "moral high ground", as you put it. It's just my personal policy to not vote until I'm confident someone is scum. If it's bad logic, well... I don't know, I'm still pretty new at this so it could be... but I think most of my arguments have been sound enough so far that I'm not a threat to the town at this point, and I don't think whether or not I participate in RVS should matter... I'm expressing thoughts on players and presenting arguments, that's really what's important IMO.
Eek, don't like this at all...
1. It's not really a moral high ground as much as an attempt to lie low.
2. Self defense and trying to make yourself look more townie is a scum thing to do, really. Townies will look townie because they are townie and don't have to try to look townie.
3. Noobclaiming is a terrible terrible thing to do. Regardless of alignment you should never do this, it's just so... pointless.
Meh... this just turned out to be too focused on specific players didn't it. At this point a Seven lynch would be a pretty good idea. Regardless, I'm going to hold off on my vote until we get a claim.
FoS: Seven, SeerPenguin
for now, seems like a pretty likely scumteam to me.
So, Seven, I would like to hear a claim.