Mafia 108 - Mafia With The Quickness - over!
-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8553
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
I'm seeing SK as more likely scum than Bogre.
Bogre touched on it in post 1004, but it's the firmness in stances that is what separates the two players for me. Bogre's stancces have looked more firm to me, where as SK's movement from one vote to the next has looked a lot more to me like a scum who wants to keep his options open.
When you put SK's rolefishing on top of that. I really don't like the idea of SK getting away from the noose.-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
Sorry to hear about your troubles, Haylen.
Well, I can't really defend against this, except to say I wasn't distancing.Yosarian2 wrote:You distanced from Bogre, making a weak attack against him and then voting for Zach.
I think you mean why do I think it's likely that Zach is scum with Neto, right? Anyway, I'm suspicious because he didn't really try hard to come up with reasons for voting Neto until he was pressured into doing so. Just because he was voting Neto doesn't mean he's not scum. Like I said earlier, I've seen scum bus hard before.Yosarian2 wrote:That dosn't actually answer my question, which is, why do you think it's likely Zach is scum with Bogre considering that they were the main two bandwagons for most of day 1?
Actually, your desire to have Neto lynched isYosarian2 wrote:(Also, nice little implied barb at the end there. I was certanly not "reluctant" to lynch Neto yesterday, and I think I made clear yesterday that I was intending to eventually vote for him; only reason I ended up not doing so was because the day ended so quickly.)notclear Day 2. You entered a lot of hypothetical "what-ifs" concerning the possibility that Neto is scum, true, but I didn't see anything that implied you were going to vote for him. Feel free to prove me wrong, though.
Well, up until now I was thinking he was scum. However, your post (especially regarding what I feel is misrepresentation of your behavior towards Neto on Day 2) has just made me feelYosarian2 wrote:What do you think about Bogre, SK?veryuneasy about your alignment. And if you're scum, then your most plausible scumbuddy is Zach, which would mean Bogre is innocent (assuming a 3-man scumteam)...
To Everyone Here: What do you guys think about Zach and Yos?ALMOST ALWAYS BUSY 9-6 CST WEEKDAYS-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
-
-
Yosarian2 (shrug)
- (shrug)
- (shrug)
- Posts: 16394
- Joined: March 28, 2005
- Location: New Jersey
It's not just that he was voting Neto. It's more that, in my experence, there are very rarely two major bandwagons competing against each other that are BOTH on scum; if one scum starts to get bandwagoned, scum usually push a wagon on a pro-town person to compete with it.SaintKerrigan wrote: I think you mean why do I think it's likely that Zach is scum with Neto, right? Anyway, I'm suspicious because he didn't really try hard to come up with reasons for voting Neto until he was pressured into doing so. Just because he was voting Neto doesn't mean he's not scum. Like I said earlier, I've seen scum bus hard before.
After I ran my voting analysis on day 2, this was my conclusion:
Actually, your desire to have Neto lynched isYosarian2 wrote:(Also, nice little implied barb at the end there. I was certanly not "reluctant" to lynch Neto yesterday, and I think I made clear yesterday that I was intending to eventually vote for him; only reason I ended up not doing so was because the day ended so quickly.)notclear Day 2. You entered a lot of hypothetical "what-ifs" concerning the possibility that Neto is scum, true, but I didn't see anything that implied you were going to vote for him. Feel free to prove me wrong, though.
I don't understand how you could have read that and come away with the conclusion that I was "reluctant" to lynch for Neto.Yosarian2 wrote: At the moment, I'm leaning towards lynching either Neto or Elibereth, because I can't think of any plausible scumgroups that dosn't include at least one or the other of them.
Lol.
Well, up until now I was thinking he was scum. However, your post (especially regarding what I feel is misrepresentation of your behavior towards Neto on Day 2) has just made me feelYosarian2 wrote:What do you think about Bogre, SK?veryuneasy about your alignment. And if you're scum, then your most plausible scumbuddy is Zach, which would mean Bogre is innocent (assuming a 3-man scumteam)...
That's complete bull, SK. You've never given any sign that you "thought Bogre was scum". You made a weak attack against him, made an excuse for why you voted someone else instead, and now that I'm questioning you about it, you're trying to come up with some alternate theory to try to get someone other then Bogre lynched. You claim you "Thought he was scum", but you never once really supported a bandwagon on him, at all.
I think we've got this one in the bag. Scum team is SK and Bogre.I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
And in my experience, I've seen scum bus when a partner is viewed as scummy by a good number of the players. I don't think this argument is going to lead to anything constructive, so can we drop it?Yosarian2 wrote:It's not just that he was voting Neto. It's more that, in my experence, there are very rarely two major bandwagons competing against each other that are BOTH on scum; if one scum starts to get bandwagoned, scum usually push a wagon on a pro-town person to compete with it.
That's not very compelling. Your given reason for wanting to lynch Neto (as well as Elli) is for voting patterns only. From what you've said, you could just as easily have wanted to vote for Elli. Plus, youYosarian2 wrote:I don't understand how you could have read that and come away with the conclusion that I was "reluctant" to lynch for Neto.werereluctant to lynch Neto and Zach on Day 1, and by Day 2 it could easily have been decided (after a nice nightchat) that it was better off to bus Neto rather than try to defend him.
Hey, check this out:Yosarian2 wrote: That's complete bull, SK. You've never given any sign that you "thought Bogre was scum". You made a weak attack against him, made an excuse for why you voted someone else instead, and now that I'm questioning you about it, you're trying to come up with some alternate theory to try to get someone other then Bogre lynched. You claim you "Thought he was scum", but you never once really supported a bandwagon on him, at all.
You also seem to be forgetting that I was voting for him on Day 2.SaintKerrigan wrote:I would vote for Bogre, but my vote would be the hammer, and I'm not ready to end the day just yet. I'm interested in seeing what other people have to say first.ALMOST ALWAYS BUSY 9-6 CST WEEKDAYS-
-
Incognito Not Rex
- Not Rex
- Not Rex
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: November 4, 2007
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Vote Count #7 of Day 3
Haylen (1) <-~ Maemuki
*Bogre (4) <-~ Yosarian2, Haylen, Glork, Ellibereth
SaintKerrigan (2) <-~ Zachrulez, Bogre
Zachrulez (1) <-~ SaintKerrigan
With 8 alive, 5 votes will do it.
Note:an asterisk by a player's name indicates said player would be lynched if Day were to end right this moment without a lynch majority.
Deadline wrote:[ooc][color=black]patrickgower2006 (8:12:03 PM): all beer tastes same to me
patrickgower2006 (8:12:07 PM): like dish water
If you see Patrick drinking dish water, please try and stop him. Friends don't let friends drink dish water.[/color][/ooc]-
-
Yosarian2 (shrug)
- (shrug)
- (shrug)
- Posts: 16394
- Joined: March 28, 2005
- Location: New Jersey
That has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was just making, which was about the low probability of there being two competing scum wagons; if scum decide to bus, then that also generally means there won't be two competing scum wagons.SaintKerrigan wrote:
And in my experience, I've seen scum bus when a partner is viewed as scummy by a good number of the players.Yosarian2 wrote:It's not just that he was voting Neto. It's more that, in my experence, there are very rarely two major bandwagons competing against each other that are BOTH on scum; if one scum starts to get bandwagoned, scum usually push a wagon on a pro-town person to compete with it.
Yup. Based on voting patterns, I was sure that either Neto or Elli had to be scum. And I was correct; not sure why you're trying to talk down 'voting patterns', considering how well that method of scumhunting worked. It really wasn't based on Neto's actions; I didn't think his actions were that scummy, actually, other then his claim, but based on how day 1 turned out, and based on how people were voting at different times, there just weren't that many possible scenarios where he wasn't scum.
That's not very compelling. Your given reason for wanting to lynch Neto (as well as Elli) is for voting patterns only.Yosarian2 wrote:I don't understand how you could have read that and come away with the conclusion that I was "reluctant" to lynch for Neto.
If you read that whole post, how many possible scenarios I had with him as scum vs. with him as town, I think it would have been clear that I was really leaning towards lynching Neto, both because of the high chance of him being scum and in order to gather information; there really weren't many possible scumgroups that didn't include Neto.From what you've said, you could just as easily have wanted to vote for Elli.
[/quote]Plus, youwerereluctant to lynch Neto and Zach on Day 1, and by Day 2 it could easily have been decided (after a nice nightchat) that it was better off to bus Neto rather than try to defend him.
So, first you're attacking me for not attacking Neto, now you're accusing me of bussing him?
It really looks like you're just trying to come up whatever scenerio you can that makes me look like scum. I was somewhat unhappy with lynching Neto on day 1 (although I would have been in favor of a neto lynch over a Zach lynch), but I think you were more reluctant then I was.
That was the excuse you gave for not voting for Bogre, in response to me questioning you about it and accusing you of distancing; basically, I accused you of being scum with Bogre and asked you what you thought about him, and you gave an excuse for not voting for him. Then, within a page, you suddenly started arguing that me and Zach were scum, and that Bogre was innocent.
Hey, check this out:Yosarian2 wrote: That's complete bull, SK. You've never given any sign that you "thought Bogre was scum". You made a weak attack against him, made an excuse for why you voted someone else instead, and now that I'm questioning you about it, you're trying to come up with some alternate theory to try to get someone other then Bogre lynched. You claim you "Thought he was scum", but you never once really supported a bandwagon on him, at all.
SaintKerrigan wrote:I would vote for Bogre, but my vote would be the hammer, and I'm not ready to end the day just yet. I'm interested in seeing what other people have to say first.
Also, I think you were defending Bogre from GLork here:
SaintK wrote:
Also, how is trying to put Bogre at L-1 (which he isn't at, by the way) and forcing him to claim any different from my "rolefishing" earlier? Come to think of it, you've already got a claim out of me. Now you're trying to get a claim out of someone else? This is making me feel uneasy about you. I guess I'll have to ISO you, in addition to Bogre.
Hmmm...you're right, actually, I did forget about it.SaintKerrigan wrote: You also seem to be forgetting that I was voting for him on Day 2.
Looking back, this was where you voted for Bogre:
Hmm. I do agree with you Bogre was misrepresenting Gayle there (I assume that's what you were talking about?) It's interesting; you kept your vote on Bogre for most of day 2, but I don't see much else you said to reinforce your attack on him.SaintKerrigan wrote:Unvote: Gayle. Vote: Bogre.
Misrepresentation noted.
Anyway, if you thought Bogre was scum on day 2, then why did you not seem to want to follow up on that today?I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
I'm not voting Bogre at the moment because:
A: My vote hammers him, and I want some discussion first.
B: You are currently making me feel uneasy, and if you're scum, I doubt Bogre is your partner.
If I had to vote right this minute, my vote would go on Bogre. Since I don't have to vote right this minute, I'm interested in exploring other possibilities. Right now, I'm exploring the Yos/Zach/Neto scumhood possibility.
(sigh)Yosarian2 wrote:That has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was just making, which was about the low probability of there being two competing scum wagons; if scum decide to bus, then that also generally means there won't be two competing scum wagons.Mypoint was that we're arguing different points of view on what scum will and won't do. I feel that arguing as such is fruitless.
So why didn't you vote for him, then? Actually, I have an idea. (See below.)Yosarian2 wrote:Yup. Based on voting patterns, I was sure that either Neto or Elli had to be scum. And I was correct; not sure why you're trying to talk down 'voting patterns', considering how well that method of scumhunting worked. It really wasn't based on Neto's actions; I didn't think his actions were that scummy, actually, other then his claim, but based on how day 1 turned out, and based on how people were voting at different times, there just weren't that many possible scenarios where he wasn't scum.
If you read that whole post, how many possible scenarios I had with him as scum vs. with him as town, I think it would have been clear that I was really leaning towards lynching Neto, both because of the high chance of him being scum and in order to gather information; there really weren't many possible scumgroups that didn't include Neto.
I should've said "distance" instead of bus. If you come out and bus him, it would make you look more suspicious. So you have to follow a logical progression first, find a reason to make him look suspicious from your point of view, so then when youYosarian2 wrote:So, first you're attacking me for not attacking Neto, now you're accusing me of bussing him?dobus him, it all looks natural.
Because if you and Zach are scum (and assuming there's only a 3-man scum team), Bogre must be innocent. I find it hard to pair Bogre up with either you or Zach. On the other hand, I could see you and Zach as scumpartners. Like I said earlier in this post, I'm interested in seeing what else is out there, and not just lynch the person I see is scummiest right now. Who knows what evidence probing like this can turn up?Yosarian2 wrote:That was the excuse you gave for not voting for Bogre, in response to me questioning you about it and accusing you of distancing; basically, I accused you of being scum with Bogre and asked you what you thought about him, and you gave an excuse for not voting for him. Then, within a page, you suddenly started arguing that me and Zach were scum, and that Bogre was innocent.
This isn't me defending Bogre. This is me asking Glork how what he is doing isn't considered "rolefishing," which I've been accused (by him and other people) of doing. I think you're stretching a bit here.Yosarian2 wrote:Also, I think you were defending Bogre from GLork here:
SaintKerrigan wrote:Also, how is trying to put Bogre at L-1 (which he isn't at, by the way) and forcing him to claim any different from my "rolefishing" earlier? Come to think of it, you've already got a claim out of me. Now you're trying to get a claim out of someone else? This is making me feel uneasy about you. I guess I'll have to ISO you, in addition to Bogre.
I wasn't feeling well for the latter part of Day 2, if you'll recall. Neto got lynched before I could return and continue my line of inquiry.Yosarian2 wrote:Hmm. I do agree with you Bogre was misrepresenting Gayle there (I assume that's what you were talking about?) It's interesting; you kept your vote on Bogre for most of day 2, but I don't see much else you said to reinforce your attack on him.
Because at the start of the day I was more preoccupied with ISO'ing Haylen and Maemuki, two of my suspects at the time. By the time Bogre came back into the spotlight, I decided I wanted to re-ISO him to make sure I had my suspicions right. When I was done with that, he was at L-1, so I couldn't vote for him. I was also dealing with conflicting suspicions of Bogre and Zachrulez. As I said earlier, I don't think those two can be scum together.Yosarian2 wrote:Anyway, if you thought Bogre was scum on day 2, then why did you not seem to want to follow up on that today?ALMOST ALWAYS BUSY 9-6 CST WEEKDAYS-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
-
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
*looks at deadline*SaintKerrigan wrote:I'm not voting Bogre at the moment because:
A: My vote hammers him, and I want some discussion first.
*looks at deadline*If I had to vote right this minute, my vote would go on Bogre. Since I don't have to vote right this minute, I'm interested in exploring other possibilities. Right now, I'm exploring the Yos/Zach/Neto scumhood possibility.
Dear SK,
You rolefished 'cause you asked Hayl "so why don't you want to claim?", which is a nice way to say "so please claim".
Btw,unvote. I wonder if Bogre can get over here before deadline...
Love,
Mae-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
*pokes Mae because he's so tired of hearing about the rolefishing claim that he really can't defend against except to say that he wasn't trying to do it*
I'm fully aware of the deadline. I'm also aware that it hasn't happened yet. I doubt Bogre is going to escape the noose (unless I get run up as an alternate wagon), so why not wait a while and talk about things, see what we can discover, eh?ALMOST ALWAYS BUSY 9-6 CST WEEKDAYS-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
-
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
*gets sword because she's so tired of hearing about that excuse*SaintKerrigan wrote:*pokes Mae because he's so tired of hearing about the rolefishing claim that he really can't defend against except to say that he wasn't trying to do it*
I'm fully aware of the deadline. I'm also aware that it hasn't happened yet. I doubt Bogre is going to escape the noose (unless I get run up as an alternate wagon), so why not wait a while and talk about things, see what we can discover, eh?
Yeah, if you want me to be super bored...sure why not.-
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
-
-
Haylen Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Posts: 6831
- Joined: April 1, 2009
- Location: Southern England
*smacks you both round the head with a newspaper*
Quit it. 2.5 hrs til deadline.
*knocks myself out with newspaper.*Seriously. Read your role PM before playing.
I am sorry if you have to prod me, I have absolutely no concept of time.
My prefered pronoun set is "cie/cir/cirs[elf]" but they is more than acceptable.-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
-
-
Haylen Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Posts: 6831
- Joined: April 1, 2009
- Location: Southern England
-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
-
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
-
-
Haylen Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Posts: 6831
- Joined: April 1, 2009
- Location: Southern England
I dont think either of them is scummy. But i'm trying to work out why Yos has been kept alive for so long, if he's town.Seriously. Read your role PM before playing.
I am sorry if you have to prod me, I have absolutely no concept of time.
My prefered pronoun set is "cie/cir/cirs[elf]" but they is more than acceptable.-
-
Haylen Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Posts: 6831
- Joined: April 1, 2009
- Location: Southern England
-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
-
-
Haylen Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Life of the Third Party
- Posts: 6831
- Joined: April 1, 2009
- Location: Southern England
-
-
SaintKerrigan Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Brings Out The Flavour
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: September 6, 2009
- Location: Drowning in printing ink.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.