This is Plum, brief notes on a brief reread.
SB gives me gut scum feelings, probably really null.
DRK's comment about what little Vaya had posted being scummy when Vaya
hadn't posted at all
is hella scummy.
Unvote; Vote: DRK
. The response is even scummier. Yes, you can argue that not posting during the pregame is scummy (I'll remain unconvinced it's not among the weakest of scumtells, but that's a different story). You cannot argue that Vaya's posted little and what she's posted was scummy if all she posted was "/confirm". That's the most null thing a player could possibly post. You didn't say his lack of posting was scummy; you said the actual provided content is scummy. Misrep and the backpedal-wimpiness + sudden vote on attacker is majorly scummy.
Bogre's defense of DRK in this is noted.
manho wrote:is a random lynch better than a no lynch?
if random lynch is better, then we should get someone over the lynching criteria first.
Is a Day influenced by having an easy default policy lynch/random lynch better or worse than a day without? I say potentially worse. Theory-wise, I disagree. I'd rather that our competing wagons are on people that others find scummy, not random players. Pretty sure this is a null policy disagreement, though.
DeathRowKitty wrote:Just the tone I got from it seemed scummy. I can see how you might disagree.
The tone of a neutral "/confirm"? You should also be voting Juls, Elli, and me; and Annachie's confirm was only different in that it had a period at the end. I'm calling BS. And DRK does acknowledge that his attack, which he portrayed as serious, was abso-freaking-lutely ridiculous. Annachie's case on DRK looks good on scan, too. This doesn't preclude Elli scum at all; this is just more strongly scummy. I find it weird that Elli votes Annachie with just "didn't like his post at all" and no indication of the actual scumtells he found.
DeathRowKitty wrote:Annachie wrote:It's also in part what you wanted CSL policy lynched for.
I didn't want CSL policy lynched.
I beg to differ:
DeathRowKitty wrote:SB wrote:
Chu chu chu!
Vote: Elli
Join our policy lynch wagon. It's more likely to get us somewhere than a wagon for Elli mixing up his games.
CSL wrote:
Policy lynching will net you my vote. Do not try it.
I'm on your policy lynch wagon. Do I get your vote for that?
Yar, scumbag. Even if it was just to stir the pot - no. Just no. It feels like an "I acted scummy to increase the info and get us out of the RVS" excuse, which is usually, as I indicated, an
excuse
.
To elaborate on the sparse stuff my sister gave: I for one don't read Malp as very scummy. I can understand someone reading the post in question that way, but I simply do not. It looks like something he thought was a legitimate scumtell on the part of DRK.
As the "other fruit" I still find Elli to be among the players in this game I suspect most upon one reread on Page 9.
Ellibereth wrote:Flareonage wrote:I was gonna vote CSL and then I realized that I'm CSL /fail
VOTE: DRK
Partly random, partly OMGUS
Confirm Vote: Flareonage
Why do you read this as newb-scum as opposed to null-newb, please? Stupid =/= scummy (and I can't even tell that he's stupid, per se, any more than the average newbie).
SB's admission to not have the balls for real scumhunting, which amusing, makes me frown. Seriously. I'm a girl and my other fruit is a girl. We have the balls.
VOTE: DEATHROWKITTY
FOS: SNOW_BUNNY AND MAYBE ELLI
This is a Plum + Pomegranate alt.
