Fishy’s a Miller? Okay, miller claim is a null tell. Flavour makes some sense but that doesn’t help either way. I’d be wary of him living to endgame, I’ve seen amazing fake miller claims before (Kublai Khan) but I guess he should be judged on his play.
Yo @ Post 36. Icerint, you say Josh was role fishing, I don’t actually buy that but whatever, but if that’s the case Glork was the one that brought it up in the first place, why is it scummy to want information from a possible soft-claim?
Wat @ Snow_Bunny’s ability. UM Okay. That’s weird? I guess I could see it, maybe. I disagree with the cult thing said later by socio fwiw, seems way too ballsy for a cult recruiter to put that big of a target on their back. Possible but not likely.
SSK is voting someone for not voting the scummiest person. Lolujustconfusedme.
Also missed fishy saying 3rd parties generally appear innocent. That’s, well that’s untrue. It really does depend on the game. Lots of SK’s don’t get investigation immunity in my experience though.
Ugh @ Josh. UK’s attack on him is very valid at the end of page 3. Not really a lot else I can about it, it’s valid, and yeh, FUCK YOU JOSH.
Pom’s 78..idk. It strkes me as off, but I can’t put my finger on why. I’d nopt be surprised if she was mafia who’d considered claiming, but was hesitant to do so. Just a gut feel, but yeh.
Re: The force replacement thing about the mafia cult, it strikes me as quite inelegant and unfair, but I guess it works at the very least.
Alamaster, did ya just claim scum? Hmm okay, that elaboration looks, well flavour wise it seems to fit anyway, I guess. I think given both roles a chance to be used tonight makes the best sense from what I’ve read so far, I see the potential positives greatly outweighing the negatives. At least S_B is informed of any alignment changes.
Re: a full claim, I’d leave it up to Snow to decide. If she thinks it’s best to stay non fully claimed then I’d tend to leave her for the time being. Might be better to wait till day 2 or so to ask for a full claim actually, that way at least *she* knows what she’s doing and the scum are in the dark, for the moment at least.
Hmm Ice has subtly (or not so subtly, idk) defended Vaya a few times now. I get he doesn’t like policy lynches, but idk, it’s noted for the future.
Page 7 now for the record.
Not posting is NOT a null tell if you don’t scum hunt in your initial posts imo. Asking for a full claim like is just bad, especially from Vaya as it’s unclear where she stood on stuff after being absent.
I disagree with Glork here. I don’t think Socio is being insincere at all. I’d agree it’s quite hyperagressive but it comes across as sincere to me.
Vala’s 167 is scummy as fuck.
SSK being rather useless, JOY! Oh he has info that Vaya is scum? I don’t buy that at all actually, but we’ll see I guess. Oh rapid action? Okay, that’s interesting. Not buying it still
Vaya 210: Hesitance means he’s making it up? Why? Surely he could be just being careful with his information and not want to reveal it.
Pom comes in with …well very little.
Okay the mass votes away from JL is strange, and I say that as his replacement. He’s been scummy, and really done nothing to aleviate said scumminess so to see 3 or 4 people switch away from him is weird.
Pom why is the 3rd or any other arbitary number on the bandwagon more scummy than any other if the reasons are justified. I don’t understand this as a scum-tell at all, actually. I thought his vote was
UK your reasons in 246 for voting Icerint..
Uk wrote:Worrying too much about appearances (It's not OMGUS if you actually have reasoning, so damn the accusation and go forward. At least if you're townie)
-Bandwagon following (not scummy in and of itself but not very helpful to town)
-Strong defense of possible scum, assumption that SSK was the liar rather than Vaya at first (chainsaw possibly)
-Strong defense of Vaya prior to SSK's claim
Number 2 ins’t a scum tell, and can be helpful. Number 3 and 4 hinge on Vaya’s alignment, so I don’t get the vote switch here at all.
Wooo a Pomegranate wagon. About time.
Oh god @ Josh’s 306. DAYKILL HI…owait he’s me :/
6/1/10
Glork, 3 quick votes? Bad thing? What does it mean, the wagon is less likely to be on scum? I personally haven’t noticed speed of wagon correlating to an alignment in any game I’ve played on this site, but if you’ve seen differently I guess that’s fair enough.
SocioPath uses meta and then proceeds to spiout, well stuff. Interesting , but the entire paragraph @ UK was slightly irrelevant.
Skipping some stuff that I find interesting but not useful in developing reads on anyone.
Vaya coming back defending Ice is interesting, why do you feel Ice is town, or what has he done to look town in your eyes?
I like Almaster’s 367
Is being hypocritical a scum-tell Pom? You vote Alamaster for it, but imo he’s at least made a couple of good points, and does seem to be scum-hunting whereas I don’t get that impression from you.
UGH gonna take a break.
This is why I don't replace too often
Anyway I find pom and phate reasonably scummy, phate mostly for his predecessors actions, or lack thereof.
Alamaster looks reasonably/most townie to me at the moment, actually.
Icerint/Vaya have a connection, what that means Idk but there's been a few instances where they've defended each other. I think if one is scum the other is more likely to be scum, but it's useless to speculate with no alignments revealed.
Snow_bunny's claim is probably legit, I suggest she does what she thinks is best tonight, as she has the most info about her role.
EBWOP:
Sup Ice?
It states that it
does
investigate the alignment, but then comes back with a guilty or innocent, which is something I found a little odd, it could just be a mix up in the role pm, or mean something more, though I'm not sure.It's possible I've missed stuff in my read through, though I *think* I got everything important. Any questions on stuff I posted feel free to ask, obviously.
I'm aware we're near deadline, and it's a bad situation, but yeah, not my fault Josh disappeared.
