Sotty wrote:I see you do give some thoughts on CTD later. Can you post exactly what Leaf was doing that makes you think he was fake scum hunting or trying to slip under the radar?
Again, I'm getting the feeling that I'm using the wrong words to describe what I'm seeing. Well, hopefully this'll clear things up.
Leafy wrote:Why would that be, My Milked Eek? Do you regard a willingness to jump on such bandwagons as a towntell or a scumtell?
Leafy wrote:For what reason, ConfidAnon? Do you think that starting semirandom bandwagons early on is a good way to get discussion started?
Leafy wrote:Also, since I haven't played a game with you before, why do you dislike RVS? Do you fear a hammer vote could randomly be reached or do you just think it's childish?
I'm not 100% sure why those quotes are bothering me, but if I had to guess it's because they ask questions with obvious answers and those answers revolve more around game theory than anything else.
Leafy wrote:Uh... actually, looking at the OP, rule 6 implies that even the mafia members cannot communicate with each other at all. Mod: Can the mafia members talk to each other? If so, how?
Leafy wrote:Ellibereth - If someone explicitly tells me they are not joking, I generally take that as an indication that they are not joking (I have it marked as the first serious attack on my notes). So, if it was, in fact, a joke, what were you hoping to gain out of it? What reactions were you looking for?
These two strike me as disingenuous, particularly the last one because he said
this. Unless I was supposed to take him totally seriously that he thought I was scum because I had Mafia Scum under my name.
So that's what I was seeing. "Staying under the radar" may not be the right term for what I'm seeing, so I'll try to describe it again. Basically, I feel like he was trying to avoid connections with other players, but since doing that would make him look lurktastic and scummy I feel like he opted to ask a bunch of irrelevant/semi-relevant/reactionary questions to make it look like he was doing something.
Am I making any sense?
And Leafy, did the above answer what you wanted me to answer?
Leafy wrote:In addition, you didn't follow up your question ("So who's scum?") at all, perhaps indicating that you didn't care about my answer.
After reading your list I asked the only question I had and that was regarding your town read on Elli. I didn't really have any questions for anything else, and considering I'm calling you scummy for asking irrelevant questions it should be obvious why I didn't want to ask any questions I didn't feel were relevant.
Wicked wrote:1.) Okay, but why do you choose Leaf instead?
2.) Were you happy with that RVS stance?
3.) Were you happy with that "gut" influenced stance?
1.) I didn't feel like Thesp was trying hard to look active, so he didn't look as scummy.
2.) Not particularly, but it was better than having none.
3.) Gut influenced is fine by me. I do wish he would try to pinpoint his gut, but I don't think he's really scummy for not doing so.
Wicked wrote:Also, what do you consider to be a stance? What kind of stances would you be happy with?
_____ should be lynched. ______ idea is bad. _____ is scummy. I think ____ looks better/worse than ____ after that. Really anything that ties players together that we can look at later once we have flips. Obviously, these things should be game relevant and not theory-based or something like that (IE, I don't consider Thesp's thing against the RVS a stance) I think scum will avoid doing this because it's easier to avoid being held accountable for anything and it would make them less likely to be lynched.
Saying ____ is scummy because of ____ is better imo, but after reading several games I've found that town is just as likely to make baseless votes as scum is, so I don't really consider it a scumtell to not explain votes anymore.