mykonian wrote:everything in blue is defensive. If you don't think I am scum, feel free to skip or scan them.
good, pome, how often were those votes on popular wagons? once.
So, sure, following wagons is scummy, but that was not what I did, right?
I still find the votehopping scummy, as often scum will try to start a bandwagon (in a small game like this) that might take off. If it doesn't look like it will work, then they just vote for someone else. Plain and simple, votehopping
is
scummy, especially when it's so few to lynch.
And on that question, I'm sorry, but I meant it as "what are your own scumtells when playing scum?"
I'm not sure, I'm bad at evaluating my own meta in general. All I can offer is my wiki page, which has links to games I've played. I know it's a pain, but if you would like to and have the tme, then you can meta me yourself.
StK's answer that he didn't know what to expect from his question what everybody thought about my L-1 vote?
SC's unvote without anything else
Mr's post which only answered a question, after which he went out again.
Pome's voting density argument
Well, questions, unless rhetorical, usually are there to be answered, and can have many possible answers. The fact that StK wasn't expecting a specific answer wasn't scummy.
But the fact that my argument was based on the fact that your votes lastd for such a small amount of time each, showing that you were voting for someone you didn't find that scummy (or else you wouldn't have switched). So no, it wasn't voting density.
I have accompanied all the recent votes (3, on StK, SC, and Malpa) with why I did it, from what points this was, and how this makes that person voteworthy.
But obviously you weren't that convinced of each one's scumminess, or you wouldn't have voted for someone else so quickly. I think you're at L-1 again without my vote, so I won't vote you now.