Mini 897 - OpenSource Mafia - Game over!!

Fishythefish · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:14 am

*waits for josh to claim*

Pomegranate · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:40 am

Where's JL anyway?

Phate · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:47 am

By this game's ruleset, JL can lurk another day before he's prodded.

Pomegranate · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:56 am

Pomegranate wrote:Oh, and that reminds me:

I will always be V/LA Friday afternoon to Saturday evening.

Well, I won't be around after I submit this. Seeya tomorrow!

MafiaSSK · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:04 pm

Phate wrote:By this game's ruleset, JL can lurk another day before he's prodded.

So we lynch him regardless?

Iecerint · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:06 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:
Phate wrote:By this game's ruleset, JL can lurk another day before he's prodded.
So we lynch him regardless?

...wat?

Glork · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:49 pm

Pomegranate wrote:
Glork wrote:Also, Josh, claim or die.
Also, this.

No claim.....

....= die

Someone hammah.

Iecerint · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:46 pm

He's asking the Mod if his claim is a fair paraphrase. Apparently.

Glork · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:49 pm

Oh, right, I had forgotten about that. Feh.

SocioPath · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:43 pm

Glork wrote:
SocioPath wrote:
UncertainKitten wrote:Don't see it working. I don't see how my gender has factored into this actually.
UncertainKitten wrote:I'm aware. Course, if you want to keep complimenting me, go ahead ^-^.
Also notice how virtually every response to a part of my post starts with a short, snippet of a sentence.
Was that something that happened on purpose in that you had planned?
Or did it just sort of turn out that way?
Now, its not uncommon for you to have a such response, but look at the concentration.
Ugh, how is this relevant to ANYTHING? People have different posting styles. I can't even tell if you're trying to raise this as a point
against
UK. If you are, how do short responses make her more likely to be scum? If not, why did you make this post at all?

It was relevant in my discussion with UK. It its not neccesarily a point raised

against

UK. Its a point that there may have been a slightly more emotional response than the norm for UK. As UK said:

UncertainKitten wrote:
MafSSK wrote:
SP your case makes no fricken sense.
I shouldn't answer for SP, but in this case, he's not making a case on me, he's trying to mindfuck me.

It was mostly theory discussion about how I perceive, and react to, different players and types of players, with more factors than just in-game meta.

None of it was relevant scum hunting, but it was TIED to the original relevant part:
That I believe Pom's lack of scum hunting at that point was not as major of a concern as an almost majority of the town was making it out to be.
Which IS relevant. At least I saw it as such.

Also Glork, you seem burdened by erratic playing, which I find off about you.

Glork · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:19 am

Define "off." I'm not really interested in a meta discussion about myself unless you find it genuinely and seriously scummy, but I will say that erratic behavior is something of a hallmark of mine.

Snow_Bunny · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:32 am

Meh, what's taking Josh so long?

Pomegranate · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:37 pm

I might hammer after the claim, depending. But it is taking way too long.

Snow_Bunny · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:04 pm

Usually, brewing a good claim takes time. Just saying.

Pomegranate · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:07 pm

Snow_Bunny wrote:Usually, brewing a good claim takes time. Just saying.

SB: Did you mean:

Usually, brewing a good claim takes time.

OR

Usually, brewing a good fakeclaim takes time.

Because the second one is true, and the first one is too, but not as strongly. That's why JL lurking more isn't doing him or anyone any good.

Phate · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:10 pm

I say if Josh doesn't post then it is the responsibility of the mod to replace him. So we wait. If his next post doesn't contain a full claim then he's stalling scum and we should lynch him.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:01 pm

Oh? Who's Phate's alt?

Phate · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:03 pm

I don't have an alt.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:09 pm

Nevermind.

I missed that you replaced Vala. Chalk it up to stupidity.

Iecerint · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:26 pm

Just realized I'm still on Alma. I'll race Pome to the hammer if we're not satisfied with the claim (as seems likely).

Fishythefish · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:15 am

@mod:

JL is in need of a prod.

Glork · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:50 am

I think our mod is in need of a prod as well.... :/

AlmasterGM · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:14 am

Still here, waiting like the rest of you.

Snow_Bunny · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:36 am

Pomegranate wrote:
Snow_Bunny wrote:Usually, brewing a good claim takes time. Just saying.
SB: Did you mean:

Usually, brewing a good claim takes time.

OR

Usually, brewing a good fakeclaim takes time.

Because the second one is true, and the first one is too, but not as strongly. That's why JL lurking more isn't doing him or anyone any good.

I meant the second.

Pomegranate · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:07 am

Snow_Bunny wrote:
Pomegranate wrote:
Snow_Bunny wrote:Usually, brewing a good claim takes time. Just saying.
SB: Did you mean:

Usually, brewing a good claim takes time.

OR

Usually, brewing a good fakeclaim takes time.

Because the second one is true, and the first one is too, but not as strongly. That's why JL lurking more isn't doing him or anyone any good.
I meant the second.

Yeah, I agree, and that's why the longer he lurks, the worse it looks.