Nooooo! He'll be harder to kill if he lurks.Papa Zito wrote:On second thought, maybe you should go back to lurking.
We need
MOAR HAYKER
Nooooo! He'll be harder to kill if he lurks.Papa Zito wrote:On second thought, maybe you should go back to lurking.
Umm Hayker if you are talking about Iecerint, a read of the past few posts would show you Iecerint already explained he can't do another vig...Hayker wrote:I must say, that is exelent directing of the vig papa zito. I wonder what other fun things you've said this game...
So three small, basically meaningless posts are all you could find in your ISO of Papa Zito and those are the "juicy goodness"? Sad.Hayker wrote:I just read your iso and found a bunch of juicy goodness, and am now pointing out everything.
Are you even trying? Or are you just posting for the sake of posting? Someone saying they are scratching their head in confusion is a scumtell? And you vote them over it?Hayker wrote:ScumtellPapa Zito wrote:This is me scratching my head in confusion.
/vote:Papa Zito
I missed this. If you'll recall to the time just after Discode's darkness-related Miller claim, Roxas and Riku were the two likely roles people mentioned. In the eventuality that DGB is Roxas, I thought there was a good chance he could be with the Nobodies.DTM wrote:That was amazingly specific about DGB. Why did you just say DGB could br Roxas right out of the blue?
So you have rolebased info? Well that settles it then. The other condemned prisoners will have to wait their turns.RayFrost wrote:7. Zito is a nobody. My secret one shot info told me so.
I am aware of this, however, he still is directing a vig, if a non-existant one. What is weird is that he isn't directing the vig at me, even though I am his highest suspect as far as I can tell.wolframnhart wrote:Umm Hayker if you are talking about Iecerint, a read of the past few posts would show you Iecerint already explained he can't do another vig...Hayker wrote:I must say, that is exelent directing of the vig papa zito. I wonder what other fun things you've said this game...
Small doesn't mean meaningless. In fact, usually it's the small things that allow you to catch scum.So three small, basically meaningless posts are all you could find in your ISO of Papa Zito and those are the "juicy goodness"? Sad.Hayker wrote:I just read your iso and found a bunch of juicy goodness, and am now pointing out everything.
The act of beign confused is a scumtell. I learned this on epic mafia, and this will be the first time it has failed me if it does.Are you even trying? Or are you just posting for the sake of posting? Someone saying they are scratching their head in confusion is a scumtell? And you vote them over it?Hayker wrote:ScumtellPapa Zito wrote:This is me scratching my head in confusion.
/vote:Papa Zito
There is no way for me to prove this, but I was basically ignoring Zito until the directing of the vig thing.Really this looks like a reaction to Zito's post about you.
Things happen. nothing to be confused by. A scumtell is a scumtell.Papa Zito wrote:You somehow missed that Sajin was the one speaking through the mod? lol?Hayker wrote:This actually isn't one of my points, but I just noticed that you mentioned Sajin, and proceeded to talk about the Ghost. Might be some context I'm missing. Please clarify what was happening here if you can.Yup
That's called scumhunting. I appreciate you don't know the difference.Hayker wrote:Blatent buddying
Unless you meant the adorable part. That's just trufax.....Why would you even think that I was refering to the other potion of the post?
Fact or not, buddying is buddyingI shouldn't be confused by the player who announces that he's not going to play for an entire gameday?Hayker wrote:ScumtellPapa Zito wrote:This is me scratching my head in confusion.
On second thought, maybe you should go back to lurking.
Well, that's good to know. I don't understand why my caution in this case seems weird. Before you point at yesterday, don't forget SSK claimed scum before Cobalt fired, and that Cobalt claimed a scummy role before Kdub implied (and also fleshed out the claim a lot more).Iec wrote: I would make a funny face at you for that, but the chance of you being scum with PZ is realistically very low.
I am suddenly compelled by your argumentIec wrote: I think the most likely result of RF elaborating would be giving remaining scum information they don't need. If RF is wrong, he dies tomorrow 100% IMO. The only reason we should reevaluate is if PZ comes out and claims Miller, in which case I certainly wish he'd have been responsible and done so D1, etc.
4/9UncertainKitten wrote:I would like RF to elaborate on his information.
I will vote Papa Zito given the elaboration is acceptable.
:LOVE:UncertainKitten wrote:I am suddenly compelled by your argumentIec wrote: I think the most likely result of RF elaborating would be giving remaining scum information they don't need. If RF is wrong, he dies tomorrow 100% IMO. The only reason we should reevaluate is if PZ comes out and claims Miller, in which case I certainly wish he'd have been responsible and done so D1, etc.
Unvote, Vote Papa Zito
Please ignore my call for elaboration, RF.
A) The post I made shows why. - I felt there was a connection between him and Gorrad.wolframnhart wrote:Rayfrost, couple questions for you.
A)If you had (have) a secret one shot ability that told you Zito is a Nobody, why did you decide to use it on Zito?
B)If he is a Nobody, why are you not voting him?
If he gets in here to make his lulzfakeclaim before he dies, then by all means let him.DrippingGoofball wrote:Do we bother letting Zito claim? It would be only for laughs anyway.