Ugh, how is this relevant to ANYTHING? People have different posting styles. I can't even tell if you're trying to raise this as a pointSocioPath wrote:UncertainKitten wrote:Don't see it working. I don't see how my gender has factored into this actually.Also notice how virtually every response to a part of my post starts with a short, snippet of a sentence.UncertainKitten wrote:I'm aware. Course, if you want to keep complimenting me, go ahead ^-^.
Was that something that happened on purpose in that you had planned?
Or did it just sort of turn out that way?
Now, its not uncommon for you to have a such response, but look at the concentration.
I understand where UK is coming from regarding Iece's "worrying about how people percieve him," but I don't necessarily agree with it.
I love Vaya's posting so far. I really do. Many of his thoughts eerily parallel my own, and he's actually digging into the crux of why I voted Pom to begin with. He's very vote-hoppy right now (three vote changes between Posts 356 and 375), but that's not a point against his alignment.
Pom's post against Alma feels like mere deflection. She may even believe that it's not truly OMGUS, but it's still her stammering and going "look at this guy" immediately after someone said "she's never actually made a firm case or voted anyone."
Regarding SSK's response to Pom (you're hypocritical, and IIoA is outdated):
-- I disagree with him on the hypocrisy site. I used to say that hypocrisy is a scumtell in everyone but me, and I didn't just say it for the irony. I understand where Pom coming from here
-- I agree with him completely on the IIoA site. Well, mostly... I didn't think IIoA was a big deal or a reliable scumtell to begin with
This is interesting.Snow_Bunny wrote:I'm getting a good vibe from Almaster, although his claim, upon a second look, looks really a scumclaim. Truth be told, I'd rather lynch him first than try to convert him (I rather lose a townie than create another scum). Almaster, if you are really town, then you wouldn't want me to target you. And thus, I ask again, do you want me to target you tonight?
Ah, if you hadn't had claimed cop-something, I'd be voting for you now. Do you understand the risks of me performing my power on a town, right?MafiaSSK wrote:I think we should let alma get the alleged alignment change. It will help town.
Vote: Glork
She expresses that Alma's claim "looks really like a scumclaim," says she would rather lynch than convert, then votes for me for reasons unexplained. I'll bite. Why me, and why now?
Alma, can you explain exactly what changed your mind between these two posts:
AlmasterGM wrote:Use it on me, please. This is not a joke.SB wrote:That was a serious post. I can change a player's alignment during night. Only one per night, though. I was thinking that it was easy to create a happy ending if mafia just outed themselves and I turned them into town. As UK said, you can test it with your weakest member.
AlmasterGM wrote:No.SB wrote:I'm getting a good vibe from Almaster, although his claim, upon a second look, looks really a scumclaim. Truth be told, I'd rather lynch him first than try to convert him (I rather lose a townie than create another scum). Almaster, if you are really town, then you wouldn't want me to target you. And thus, I ask again, do you want me to target you tonight?
For now, I'm keeping my vote on Pom.