I'm gonna
It was just a random vote guys, I don't really sense scum from him.
Glad to know your penis is still on my pman.
Absolutely nothing. It was a joke comment. I mean, my vote was an RVS vote tooKonowa wrote: @Parama - What is wrong with two votes in a row for the same person during RVS?
Richard, you need to stop with the noobclaiming. If it doesn't work on SH, it's certainly not going to work on mafiascum. And honestly, you've had enough experience that you should at least know the basics.RichardGHP wrote:I sense a bandwagon forming on me here. Hmm...
Vote: Fugitive
You were quick to follow ready2rock's vote for me. That SCREAMS bandwagon. Also, it's not my fault that I don't know what RVS is, and to be honest, that's pretty poor reasoning for a vote.
see:Fugitive wrote:How about you actually give me a question. If you actually read the previous posts there were no questions posed to me, and thus no way I could deflect a question.Konowa wrote:
Deflection of question does not feel right. Competing wagon go.
Konowa wrote: @Fugitive - I am not asking you what you think of wagoning this early. I am asking what you think of malpascp placing an early fifth vote on CSL.
Nice Pain of Salvation on the two biggest targets thus far (besides the RVS wagon on CSL).pman5595 wrote:PoS: Fugitive, RichardGHP(yes Scorehero, I'm bringing the penis of suspicion back )
not really sure enough to vote for either one yet.
Didn't unvote after pressure, I don't believe Richard is scum. He just seemed over eager and in the other game he's talking about he got overly defensive after ANY suspicion fell onto him. That's his meta. I would have unvoted sooner if it was pressure based.Bogre wrote:Fugitive: Why the unvote after pressure?
This is correct.Fugitive wrote:Didn't unvote after pressure, I don't believe Richard is scum. He just seemed over eager and in the other game he's talking about he got overly defensive after ANY suspicion fell onto him. That's his meta. I would have unvoted sooner if it was pressure based.Bogre wrote:Fugitive: Why the unvote after pressure?
I understand that concerning your meta, buy to a lot of people, you saying "I didn't know what that is" comes off as scum trying not to take responsibility for their actions. Therefore, it is in your best interest to know everything you can. At the very least, if you don't know something, look it up on the wiki, that way you won't waste a post being confused as to what a term means.I genuinely did not know what RVS was (as in stood for), although I now do. I personally disagree with it but I guess that's the only way to go on Day 1.
pman is still suspicious for reasons I listed in 45. Calls Fuji's Richard vote a bandwagon. I agree with Parama in that he FoSed two people who have garnered votes the most besides CSL.ready2rock wrote: I would especially like to hear from pie. He has only had one post of real content and I would like to hear his and other people's opinions on how the day has progressed.
*sigh* I've said it once and I'll say it again: I amInflatablePie wrote:
Richard is acting like he usually does, but him noobclaiming by now is old. Especially if he's gonna mod a game on a forum that most of this games' players go to? Yeah, he's no noob.
It's been -one- day, yeesh.curiouskarmadog wrote:unvote
Mod maybe prod CSL?
the humor was meant to entertain, not to distract. I just figured that we were just coming off the RVS and a little humor wouldn't be out of lineNicodemus wrote:Others' observations on pman seem good. he's trying to distract by throwing in too much humor (scum tell imo) while remaining very non-committal about his vote. His quick vote and then unvote of Fugitive after three paragraphs of defense from Fugi was especially telling, as if he's scared to get caught on a bandwagon.
Are you SURE there's nothing you can add? There's 3 pages of content, plenty to go off of at this early point in the game.CCARaven4 wrote:As one of the only people left in the game who has not posted, but have no real content to add, I present to you all the very first votals of the game!
You have to drag people into the spotlight if you want to get anywhere, even if there's not a whole lot about them. If you don't get all the players involved, the scum could continue lurking throughout the game and make it harder for the town to lynch them. Of course, if somebody's lurking for too long then they're just going to end up attracting attention anyways.pman5595 wrote:I'm non-committal about my vote because it's day 1. We have basically nothing to go on. That is something I have noticed about this site. People seem likely to vote for someone with a lot less information than I would be comfortable with. I unvoted Fugitive because after rereading his posts, while still seeming suspicious, it wasn't enough for me to comfortably vote.