Mafia 103 - Ktown Mafia (Game Over)

[Faraday]

If we have 4 scum we should mass claim. Hmm having seen lovers + a vig tho I'm not sure if we're looking at 4 scum at all.


I want to vote SolemnJ. I don't like him at all around deadline believing a vanilla claim for no reason etc, the wicked lynch was bad. Gonna have to go back, might look at the BW analysis even tho it's not usually v helpful to me.

We need cades etc to contribute, in all honesty he should have been lynched yesterday.

Be back w/ more later probably.

[Faraday]

hey cades how about some fucking content? I see you posting *something* in other games, don't ignore this game.

[cades]

I just got active while this game was at night.
I have nothing to say in this game right now.

[Faraday]

Why not? You've had nothing to say all game.

[kunkstar7]

Are you serious cades? We have been through two days, and you have *nothing*?

@faraday: What gave you the idea of four scum?

With the way that the wicked lynch turned out, we should put some real consideration into pressuring CrueKnight. Cruelty also opposed wicked, but since his reasonings against wicked were well founded, I'm not giving that too much weight.

[Faraday]

Well 3 scum in a 12 player game is the usual so 4 could theoretically be balanced here, but that seems rather unlikely due to the town having a lover pair and vigilante.

[kunkstar7]

If that's unlikely then how many scum do you think there might be?

[Faraday]

Thought it was obvious from the above post but 3.

[kunkstar7]

Oh sorry I was thinking your were hinting at more than four, but yea that would be more unbalanced.

[CrueKnight]

Hey just stopped to say Merry Christmas! I'll be on Monday.

And I am very dissapointed. No mafia yet! :/

[cruelty]

vote: cades

Be back later (today, tomorrow, day after..) with more content, happy holidays all.

[Kdub]

Vote Count

CrueKnight (0)

-

Furry (0)

-

cruelty (0)

-

Sir Chris (0)

-

kunkstar7 (0)

-

Faraday (0)

-

SolemnJ (0)

-

danakillsu (0)

-

mikeburnfire (0)

-

cades (1)

- cruelty

No Lynch (0)

-

Not Voting (9)

- CrueKnight, Furry, Sir Chris, kunkstar7, Faraday, SolemnJ, danakillsu, mikeburnfire, cades

10 players alive, 6 votes needed to lynch.

Deadline is January 18, ~12:00 pm MST

[Sir Chris]

Given what we know I'd much rather devour a late bandwagoner on the wicked lynch rather than a useless lurker, but then again even lurkers can be scum.

But this is troubling, I was very sure wicked was scum, and now it turns many of my assumptions on their head, like how good cruelty and kunk looked.

[cades]

Replace me, I can't follow this game anymore.

(I was town)

[Kdub]

Heilograph replaces cades. Thanks Heliograph!

[Heilograph]

Heya guys, wanted to wish ya all happy holidays.
ill read throught the rest of the thread soon as i get back in the states (only on page 3...)

[Furry]

Given what we know I'd much rather devour a late bandwagoner on the wicked lynch rather than a useless lurker, but then again even lurkers can be scum.

Why?

I still am not a huge cades lurker-lynch fan. If we are lurker lynching it really should be dana, even though the SJ lynch sure still looks better to it then me. Once dana and SJ answer my questions I will have thoughts up on the matter of which one of them should be getting the axe (hint its probably SJ).

[Heilograph]

Cruelity (my bad on trying to spell)
I would like you to go into great detail why you voted cadres.

[Furry]

Cruelity (my bad on trying to spell)
I would like you to go into great detail why you voted cadres.

Ive been wondering why cades over dana myself actually. No one seems to have a good answer for me there.

[Faraday]

Given what we know I'd much rather devour a late bandwagoner on the wicked lynch rather than a useless lurker, but then again even lurkers can be scum.

Why?

I still am not a huge cades lurker-lynch fan. If we are lurker lynching it really should be dana, even though the SJ lynch sure still looks better to it then me. Once dana and SJ answer my questions I will have thoughts up on the matter of which one of them should be getting the axe (hint its probably SJ).

If we were going to lurker lynch it probably should have been yesterday instead of the move to wicked.

[kunkstar7]

We have a lot of time for discussion, I don't think we should be considering a lurker lynch, we should be pressuring possible leads instead. This is not saying we should ignore lurkers, we need to get them into the game as well.

[mikeburnfire]

Okay, so we've got 10 players alive, 5 players dead, and no scum located yet. I owe it to you guys to hit this game head-on. However, my internet connection sucks (if you saw it you'd think I was using dialup from 1995) so every time I try to get into this game I am unsuccessful. It make take me a while, but I'm going to make sure we hit scum today.

[SolemnJ]

@dana - Its time to take off the shackles and strech! A new morning! With luck a new beginning... if you are in to that kind of beginning *nuzzle*... if not disregard that.

Anyways, if you could of gotten ANY lynch yesterday what one would it of been?

@SJ - Same question, just without all the kinky stuff.

Aw...I liked the kinky stuff. If I could have gotten any lynch yesterday, ANY lynch, I would have been stumped. With this perspective, I feel that I'm too trusting. The only person I was remotely suspicious of is you.

If we have 4 scum we should mass claim. Hmm having seen lovers + a vig tho I'm not sure if we're looking at 4 scum at all.


I want to vote SolemnJ. I don't like him at all around deadline believing a vanilla claim for no reason etc, the wicked lynch was bad. Gonna have to go back, might look at the BW analysis even tho it's not usually v helpful to me.

We need cades etc to contribute, in all honesty he should have been lynched yesterday.

Be back w/ more later probably.

I believed the vanilla claim because I saw that dana had been subbed in, and I felt like believing her. I like to think I can figure out a person's role by the way they post, in the categories: Cop, Doc, Vanilla. I've already narrowed down the people I think are Cop. And Dana's story fit for being a vanilla.

I suppose she could be scum, but I'm still leaning towards her claim being true.

***

I feel like I've been looking at everything in the wrong way, and I'll post my revisions of my list of the most scummy people here.

[Faraday]

]

I believed the vanilla claim because I saw that dana had been subbed in, and I felt like believing her. I like to think I can figure out a person's role by the way they post, in the categories: Cop, Doc, Vanilla. I've already narrowed down the people I think are Cop. And Dana's story fit for being a vanilla.

I suppose she could be scum, but I'm still leaning towards her claim being true.

Yeah I call bullshit. I don't see how you can believe a vanilla is a vanilla from the claim alone. I get the whole thinking she's not a power role but it doesn't stop her from being scum. Also the premature claim was bad.

[Heilograph]

I like to think I can figure out a person's role by the way they post, in the categories: Cop, Doc, Vanilla. I've already narrowed down the people I think are Cop. And Dana's story fit for being a vanilla.

I would really like to know how that process works.
Could you enlighten me?