Kingdom Hearts Mafia - Game Over!

[Sir Chris]

Fakeclaiming as town is a cardinal sin, and if he is doing such that is beyond fail.

[raider8169]

Yea raider I am pretty sure that has been established. Way to try and seem more townish.

FoS raider

As I said before I am only skimming until after the holidays when I should have time to go back and properly catch up. I am just trying to stay up to date as best I can. My bad.

[raider8169]

Cobalt's abiliy seems shady to me but it would result in a one for one trade. To me I would think it would work the opposite as that would make sense.

@Sir Chris, what more do you need to use your ability?

[DrippingGoofball]

Ya know, I think they ARE scumbuddies.

YAY!

But nice try by Cobalt.

[Sir Chris]

[quote="raider8169"]Cobalt's abiliy seems shady to me but it would result in a one for one trade. To me I would think it would work the opposite as that would make sense.

@Sir Chris, what more do you need to use your ability?[/quote

I have a passive of some sort, and it is confusing. I'll let you guys know if it actually, like, gives me anything.

[DrippingGoofball]

It doesn't matter which of SSK or Cobalt gets axed first.

Cobalt's one-shot "role" has only a single purpose. To get town cred.

They BOTH need to die. They're both scum.

Iecerint dayvigs one, we lynch the other.

[Cobalt]

It doesn't matter which of SSK or Cobalt gets axed first.

Cobalt's one-shot "role" has only a single purpose. To get town cred.

They BOTH need to die. They're both scum.

Iecerint dayvigs one, we lynch the other.

Oh yeah? Then why aren't you lynching Iecerint, who shot a townie straight up? My role lets everyone publicly see that MSSK is lying.
Again, if I'm scum, why did I claim the shot AND my ability? I could easily have lied about either.

[Shotty to the Body]

So uh why not kill Cobalt first? He has the less believable claim.

He has a mod scene, that makes his claim a tad more believable...

[Shotty to the Body]

Fakeclaiming as town is a cardinal sin, and if he is doing such that is beyond fail.

Fakeclaiming as town is a rare gamble and in this case he definitely lost.

[Sir Chris]

Fakeclaiming as town is a cardinal sin, and if he is doing such that is beyond fail.

Fakeclaiming as town is a rare gamble and in this case he definitely lost.

Is it just me or did you just call him town there.

[Shotty to the Body]

Fakeclaiming as town is a cardinal sin, and if he is doing such that is beyond fail.

Fakeclaiming as town is a rare gamble and in this case he definitely lost.

Is it just me or did you just call him town there.

Sorry I thought we played mafia, not 'omg you didn't use "if" in every statement you make therefore u r scumz.'

[DTMaster]

@Gorrad

I'll await your responses but the whole point of the posts are your fluff.

You are fluffy. You are a distraction. Your flavour analysis isn't helping. Why?

You attacked Icerient because he used a gun. Not the fact that he used the kill in a protown manner to allow the town to have two town driven kills rather then let scum control the board. Why do we want town driven kills?

Town wants to : eliminate those who are scummy and appear detrimental to the town.

Scum wants to: eliminate those who are detrimental to the success of scum or will put the game in their advantage.

Its a glaring example of fake scum hunting in your posts so you sir set up lots of scum vibes for me.

@DGB
I agree with the cobalt thing. Like seriously, it makes more sense for scum-Cobalt to day shoot scum-SSK. Based on the whole reactions, I wager they are independent scum rather then busin scum, but that's just me.

@Cobalt
You do realize Icerint shot the wagon that was about to be lynch. Zwet was dead. I rather have him shoot Zwet to let the town get a second shot at scum. >>;;

@Shotty
You do realize that Scum always fakeclaims as town. It doesn't do them much benifit if they claim scum unless they are beat and have someone else to kill (Read my Jungle Republic game. The lone wolf claimed wolf to work with the town and hunt down mafia!!!).

In fact that statement makes no sense: It's like saying town who claims scum usually ends up getting lynched. Scum who fakeclaims town usually are lying. Like, the point was?

[Shotty to the Body]

I meant if a townie fake-caims.

[Shotty to the Body]

You realize I was in that jungle republic game right? VT won in end-game ring any bells? =P

[Kdub]

Cobalt: Name and flavor claim please. If you have other abilities, you can keep those to yourself for now.

[DTMaster]

:p Seery, I forgot you help won that game.

[Shotty to the Body]

:p Seery, I forgot you help won that game.

S'alrite, now we're even since I mislynched you first.

[Shotty to the Body]

Anyways out of the last few pages that sprung up since I was here last we know SSK is lying about his claim, fire at will Captain, no reason not to dayvig him for a second lynch if we have more shots.

[Cobalt]

@Cobalt
You do realize Icerint shot the wagon that was about to be lynch. Zwet was dead. I rather have him shoot Zwet to let the town get a second shot at scum. >>;;

Yes. We can still do an Iec daykill and a lynch today- we just have to include MSSK as one of them ^_^
Kdub: I already iterated that I believe there to be other claim-based abilities in the game, so I'll just say that I'm from Disney Castle.

[Kdub]

Kdub: I already iterated that I believe there to be other claim-based abilities in the game, so I'll just say that I'm from Disney Castle.

I asked for a name claim because I got some info on you last night, and that info tells me that you are lying.

I will claim if the rest of the town asks me to, but otherwise we should kill Cobalt now. Him flipping scum doesn't necessarily clear SSK.

[Cobalt]

Kdub: I already iterated that I believe there to be other claim-based abilities in the game, so I'll just say that I'm from Disney Castle.

I asked for a name claim because I got some info on you last night, and that info tells me that you are lying.

I will claim if the rest of the town asks me to, but otherwise we should kill Cobalt now. Him flipping scum doesn't necessarily clear SSK.

Elucidate.

[Kdub]

There is no character from Disney Castle that matches with the info I got on you. That is all I will say for now.

[Cobalt]

Without knowing who you are/what that information is, I have no way to respond.

[UncertainKitten]

Also Kitten person I totally forget what I was accusing you of, honestly.

I replaced saberwolf. You were accusing saberwolf of being scum for his positions on some wagon. I really can't say much for that, I just found it interesting this was dropped.

UK, DN is anti-town, but that is his meta. Also, assuming you're citing his premature claim, I see no scum basis for his behavior. I describe SC's meta in a later post. WFH's vote is only gone for today. I think the answer to everything else is probably "yes."

Yes, I know it's DN's meta. I also don't care. Why is he not dead yet? He has reached the policy kill point in the games that I have had the displeasure of playing with him. You have a gun. Why have you not shot him? He is a liability in lylo.

And yes, I RARELY argue for policy lynches/vigs. DN is JUST. THAT. TERRIBLE.

Sir Chris 1983: Just because it's an anti town role does NOT make it necessarily held by scum.

That said it is a pretty terrible thing to claim. I think that SSK is a better lynch and the Cobalt needs to be investigated at some point.

Ace 1991 holds my stance.

And...yeah, sorry SSK, RayFrost is right. You were wagoned (I'll be interested to see what caused that)

You know what the greatest part is? YOU EVEN SAID YOU WERE FAKECLAIMING IN YOUR POST! Why no one picked up on this is BAFFLING to me.

Eh, thinking on it, I agree with a cobalt full claim including flavor.

Ah, Kdub clarifies everything.

SSK and Cobalt both need to die.

I will catch pages 76-my previous post now.

[UncertainKitten]

Iec 1877: Again, why didn't you shoot him in your first post?

Hayker 1878 and Reckoner 1879: Hayker isn't you. I note your concerns but overall I'd like to see the case on Hayker as well ^-^;

Hayker's 1880 makes my point.

DGB 1881: Thank you ^-^. I may verify this after Cobalt/SSK is resolved

Ray's 1887: Sums up what I'm getting from this game.

WRH 1895: Amuses me. Greatly. Especially given the latest info on Cobalt.

Cobalt 1896: Sucks you are probably scum. That was funny as well.

WHAT THE HELL PEOPLE!?

This is where he ADMITS both he and Cobalt are scum! How did you all not respond to this? (or did you)

Oh good, Shotty 1899 noticed

DTMaster 1900: Compelling case on Gorrad, actually. I'll keep an eye on him.

DGB 1909: Thank god. You noticed as well.

Chris 1917: +5 scumbuddy points with SSK

Kdub 1918: This WOULD be +5 scumbuddy points but you later revealed info on Cobalt.

Chris 1919: +5 scumbuddy points with SSK. Oh, at least you were honest.

Chris 1921: +5 scumbuddy points with SSK. Rackin em up pretty fast aren't we? Why is it flimsy to vote someone who JUST CLAIMED SCUM?

Chris 1923: +5..ok, I'll stop. But why is it flimsy. Elaborate.

Reckoner 1924: +5 scumbuddy points with SSK. I don't see it as very sarcastic, especially in light of new information.

Chris 1925: -1 scumbuddy point with SSK. Sorry, you still have them.

ace 1928: Is totally my stance.

Cobalt 1929: see, this is why I wish you weren't scum. Stuff like that makes me giggle.

Reckoner 1941: And...you'd expect to not be lynched for it?

Raider 1944: +5 scumbuddy points with SSK

DGB 1945: +5 scumbuddy points with Reckoner.

AGAIN! WHY THE HELL WAS THIS NOT NOTICED! HE BLATANTLY SAID FAKECLAIM

All caught up now.

Cobalt and SSK need to die. From there Chris probably needs to die. DN needs to be shot at some point for being useless. Despite what I said to DGB I could actually see the merit in what she said about Reckoner.