Mini 898: The Game (you just lost it)-OVER

Diamondilium · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:21 am

Vote: rewq455

because I don't find your signature very witty.

And you're a dimwit, so there.
Almaster-1-Peabody
rewq455-1-Diamondilium

AlmasterGM · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:43 am

Kill: Peabody.

qax42 · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:01 am

/confirm

Oh hai.

Vote: llamaeatataco

because, despite my fondness for both llamas and tacos, I just don't think a taco is an apt nutritional decision for a llama.

SolemnJ · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:37 am

AlmasterGM wrote:
Kill: Peabody.

You are scum. Only scum says "Kill: Peabody" and nothing else. DIE.

vote Almaster

Stupid RVS...

AlmasterGM · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:37 am

SolemnJ wrote:
AlmasterGM wrote:
Kill: Peabody.
You are scum. Only scum says "Kill: Peabody" and nothing else. DIE.

vote Almaster

Stupid RVS...

Why is that true?
Is that vote RVS or serious?
Why do you dislike the RVS?

Peabody, you may be in luck. I think I've found someone who annoys me more than you.

Diamondilium · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:11 am

Unvote, Vote: AlmasterGM

Torqez · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:46 am

Vote: MrSuave

for being the only known name to me!

MrSuave · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:58 am

/confirm

llamaeatataco · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:21 pm

almaster, I too probably annoy you more than Peabody.

vote: qax42

blatant OMGUS of course. (I can't think of anything witty to say about other people's names/voting times/signatures.)

However, I WILL say this: I plan to finish this game out, but I May or may not be V/LA on Monday, Wednesday and Friday after January 18th. I'll find out probably at that time, most likely not earlier. Just giving you fair warning.

llamaeatataco · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:36 pm

I thought about not posting this, but It might make me seem less lurkish later on to have a higher post count (jk): Tacos are definitely a good nutritional choice for llamas. You can put pretty much anything IN the taco, and The taco itself is not bad for them.
---
On a more serious note, I'm probably not going to wall of text you people very often, but this game I'm experimenting with just trying to keep a PBPA of everyone saved on my computer and constantly updated. I'll probably get lazy and slack off though...
----
Also, because apparently we're supposed to give fake justifications for our votes here, I voted qax for not having a decent knowledge of a llama's nutritional needs, or the versatility of that fine food.

Suffer · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:33 pm

vote: AlmasterGM

Peabody · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:40 pm

llamaeatataco wrote:I thought about not posting this, but It might make me seem less lurkish later on to have a higher post count (jk): Tacos are definitely a good nutritional choice for llamas. You can put pretty much anything IN the taco, and The taco itself is not bad for them.
---
On a more serious note, I'm probably not going to wall of text you people very often, but this game I'm experimenting with just trying to keep a PBPA of everyone saved on my computer and constantly updated. I'll probably get lazy and slack off though...
----
Also, because apparently we're supposed to give fake justifications for our votes here, I voted qax for not having a decent knowledge of a llama's nutritional needs, or the versatility of that fine food.

This post struck me as a little bit odd. I don't know if its your playing style or whatever, but this post just looks unnecessary. You said you were 'just kidding' about the less lurkish-ness and the higher post count. So really, why were you posting this? Also, why were you debating posting this in your mind?

rewq455 · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:15 pm

Vote: Diamondilium

I find my signature VERY witty

MrSuave · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:24 pm

vote: AlmasterGM

for being a pokemon!

Peabody · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:25 pm

MrSuave wrote:
vote: AlmasterGM
for being a pokemon!

What do you think of RVS bandwagons?

Torqez · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:32 pm

Peabody wrote:
MrSuave wrote:
vote: AlmasterGM
for being a pokemon!
What do you think of RVS bandwagons?

Do you call it an RVS bandwagon if its L-2 already?

AlmasterGM · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:36 pm

Torqez wrote:
Peabody wrote:
MrSuave wrote:
vote: AlmasterGM
for being a pokemon!
What do you think of RVS bandwagons?
Do you call it an RVS bandwagon if its L-2 already?

Wow, I'm at L-2?

Impressive. If there isn't at least 1 scum on this wagon right now I'd be shocked.

Tom · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:50 pm

Sooo whats with all the AlmasterGM votes. Suffer, Suave, did you dudes know you were putting him at L-3 and L-2 respectively? And how did that make you

feeeeeel

?

Tom · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:52 pm

also @ MrSuave: I'm a Pokemon, Greg. Can you milk me?

Diamondilium · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:56 pm

I don't want things getting messy so

Unvote

.
MrSuave, why did you vote AlmasterGM and were you aware that you were putting Almaster at L-2?

AlmasterGM wrote: Impressive. If there isn't at least 1 scum on this wagon right now I'd be shocked.

Who do you think that scum is? Aimlessly throwing around an accusation isn't helping. In fact, it seems odd to me that in response to the growing wagon on you was an accusation without a target.

Also, my vote wasn't random. [/b]

Diamondilium · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:57 pm

EBWOP:
... to the growing wagon on you, was

you throwing

around an accusation...

Suffer · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:37 pm

AlmasterGM wrote:If there isn't at least 1 scum on this wagon right now I'd be shocked.

So, you get put to L-2 and all you have to say is that completely useless statement? Happy with my vote for now.

Tom wrote:Suffer, Suave, did you dudes know you were putting him at L-3 and L-2 respectively? And how did that make you
feeeeeel
?

Yes, and uh...good? Do you feel that putting someone at L-3 is important and/or noteworthy?

AlmasterGM · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:45 pm

Suffer wrote:
AlmasterGM wrote:If there isn't at least 1 scum on this wagon right now I'd be shocked.
So, you get put to L-2 and all you have to say is that completely useless statement? Happy with my vote for now.

I lol'd.

What am I supposed to say? I don't think I've heard a good reason from anyone as to why they are voting for me from anyone, including you.

Your edgy sarcasm isn't very pro-town. Neither are your warentless voting and bad arguments.

Vote: Suffer.

AlmasterGM · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:46 pm

Who do you think that scum is? Aimlessly throwing around an accusation isn't helping. In fact, it seems odd to me that in response to the growing wagon on you was an accusation without a target.

Well, I wanted to go after you or Suffer, but I thought that would be pretty ironic given my first post. That's not really an issue now, though.

Suffer · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:19 pm

AlmasterGM wrote:Your edgy sarcasm isn't very pro-town. Neither are your warentless voting and bad arguments.

First off, it's warrantless.

Anyway, that's remarkably stupid. I'm pretty sure everyone's vote at the beginning of the game has no justification. It's just that some people choose to dress it up with a fanciful reason.

And bad arguments? I'm assuming you're referring to my only other comment besides my vote, which only stated your comment was useless, and it still is. You're willing to wager that out of 5 people voting for you in a 12 person game, that at least one of them is scum. Now did you just pull that from your Probability 101 book, or are you just psychic? Regardless, my comment holds.

All that aside, I'd love for you to show me an example of a good argument, considering that we're essentially on the first page of this game. It almost seems like you just cobbled a few reasons together to cover up a OMGUS vote. It's cute.