Gut, honestly. Something feels...not scummy about Josh despite my earlier stance. I understand if that's not enough for you.@Kitten: I'm not sure I buy your change of stance on Josh. He made some scummy posts, which make him more likely scum. How does your feeling that his posts will improve make him less likely scum?
He probably won't get away with it.I think its worth repeating that this is a partial reveal game. I do have to wonder if SSK is scum expecting to get away with this because of that.
He's an obvious kill target, but there is a possibility he's actually harmless to scum. I'd like to remind scum of that possibility without playing too many of my cards. Of course, I don't think he is but I'm a gambler, and I'm hoping my adversaries are as well.
I still think its a good idea for SSK to fully claim this result he has against me. Kitten, do you have actual reason here to say that SSK shouldn't claim, despite the fact that he would be an obvious kill target regardless?
I'm aware of the partial reveal. It does not effect my plan. Well, unless the mod is an INCREDIBLE bastard, but I'll determine that by D3. But I'm getting ahead of myself ^-^;
My bias is that SSK should give us information about his result on Vaya to prevent the SSKscum scenario where he can adjust his fakeclaim to fit with the partial reveal. (UK's already said she has reason to believe this isn't the way to go, but it could be that she forgot, too.)
I'll go with this, based especially on the last sentence.UncertainKitten wrote:Here's what I'd like, if at all possible
Vaya and SSK do NOT get lynched today.
SSK, do NOT fullclaim today.
Any protective role that exists, please protect SSK from kills.
I think D2 will be quite fruitful.
Before it's asked, yes, I have official reasons to believe this is the best course of action.
It's the fourth vote actually. It bothers me as well. Initially Iec wanted to stay on Josh, despite the V/LA being pointed out. I did the same thing. Now that I've switched off Josh though, Iec has followed. This does not put me at ease, but I'll take a wait and see approach. His vote on SSK did feel more self motivated and actually scum hunty.
Iec, your vote is suspicious. The third vote on a bandwagon/in a row is a tad scummy. It's not very scummy- I'm just throwing this out there.
. Oh, makes sense with the timestamps, I guess.I simulposted with Vaya.
It's not really a scumtell, and I wish people would stop saying it is. Then again, if they did, I guess it stands a chance of becoming a scumtell again. Ah, the wonderful world of the metagame.
Actually, I've been accused of the same thing (putting down a third vote quickly, while meaning to put sown the second).
Gorrad.I thought I was the second vote, discounting Vaya? Who's our 4th wagonmate?
That's...decent but I still have my eye on you.
It's certainly true that the basis of my vote was partially UK's vote, though. I disqualified myself from starting an SP wagon back then because he was already voting me.
An odd stance, I would have thought that you of all people would appreciated behavior of the reactionary sort.UncertainKitten wrote:I think SP is being too reactionary though.
Me too!UncertainKitten wrote:And plus, I want to see where this Socio thing goes ^-^.
MafiaSSK wrote:1. This is exactly what scum would do.Vaya wrote:Alright, as far as I'm concerned, you're either drawing the wrong conclusions from the info you have, or are lying. Please share with us exactly what it is you know so I can figure out which it is.MafiaSSK wrote:Yes.Vaya wrote:Okay, I want you to elaborate on that, SSK. You're claiming to have role-related reasons to believe I'm scum?MafiaSSK wrote:Official information.UncertainKitten wrote:Is this due to official information or just a desire to protect certain scumtells you feel are true? Or is even that asking too much?
SP has the right of the situation because Vaya's obv scum No, I will not elaborate more on that matter.
2.I do not want to be night killed for the reason for this info.
UncertainKitten wrote:For the time being,MafiaSSK wrote:99%.You have mostly persuaded me. One last question that you may deign not to answer without me worrying. If you were to place a percentage confidence in your results, what would you put it as?Unvote, Vote Vaya
Just be aware if Vaya is lynched today and flips town, there's only a 1% chance I'm not going after you ^-^
That is a lovely chain of events. Also reinforced with Iec voting SSK for claiming Vaya as scum.Vaya wrote:I still think its a good idea for SSK to fully claim this result he has against me. Kitten, do you have actual reason here to say that SSK shouldn't claim, despite the fact that he would be an obvious kill target regardless?
Unvote
Vote: SocioPath
Clearly not voting for people he thinks to be the scummiest in his eyes.Iecerint wrote:I disqualified myself from starting an SP wagon back then because he was already voting me.
Maybe I'm picking a different playstyle today ^-^
An odd stance, I would have thought that you of all people would appreciated behavior of the reactionary sort.
The Iec vote was my favorite point, actually ^-^
I'm loving the wagon on me so far. I think your vote was awesome in that the reactions it caused. Mainly 2 'other' people to immediately vote me. Which are both awesome for their own reasons:
Actually, that does weigh more on my mind thinking about it.
That is a lovely chain of events. Also reinforced with Iec voting SSK for claiming Vaya as scum.
...that last point is strong. Why should a townie care what they look like? I didn't even think about that :S
Clearly not voting for people he thinks to be the scummiest in his eyes.
More interested in actual wagons than just votes for who he thinks is scum.
Basically saying 'oh I didn't vote then, because it would look like OMGUS, but now that you voted for him, its not OMGUS, but a wagon.
Hehe, sorry, I don't have any bullets this game ^-^Which I'd blame UK for, for not being reactionary enough.
Pages 9 and 10 remove the need for this, IMO.Haven't read Pages 9 and 10 yet, but
Vote: SSK
Claim info or die.