Netopalis has been acting freaking weird all game. He has attacked almost nobody in the beginning, except for a few weak attacks on
saber and DLA which totally fails to impress me. Says
DLA plays scummy all the time, then threatens to puts a weaksauce vote on DLA
if it doesn't put him in the danger zone. He comes back after some time and says he
doesn't like Ellibereth putting hewitt at L-1, but then he threatens to
hammer hewitt after a few questions are answered. Please take note what these questions actually are:
Netopalis' first question wrote:Wow....Just wow. Bitter much, Hewitt?
Netopalis' second question wrote:ABR, I know it's kind of pointless now, but can you please explain why you originally suspected him?
Since I've already posted bricks of evidence on hewitt, Neto comes off an awfully lot like scum looking for an excuse to hammer, the excuse here being "all his questions were answered and he was satisfied". I immediately spot this so I
stall for time.
12 hours have passed, Neto realizes that I'm not going to provide him with the excuse to hammer any time soon, so he goes back to
voting Ellibereth. Now keep in mind that Neto was almost going to hammer hewitt, yet in
this post, he claims to not have seen my case on hewitt nor having a good understanding of why hewitt was suspected, requiring him to read hewitt in iso. IOW, Neto was going to hammer hewitt with no idea whatsoever why hewitt was scummy. This is also where Neto starts to get hostile with me for not having given him an easy excuse to hammer and end the day. Then Nets goes and equates
CSL to DLA, then says
CSL is better than DLA. He then got
even more pissed off at me for not replying to a question he should have already known the answer to. This culminates in a
vote. Goes on to say that I attacked hewitt for no real
reason, which is just absurd, and shows just how little he is involved in the game. He has a strong
emotional reaction to my post condemning SC for replacing CSL, and this is where he starts his campaign to
wipe CSL's slate clean. Anyway, he claims that his
"serious accusation" vote was just a vote to
accentuate a point (he still wants to know why I suspected hewitt). He basically lied about his vote. He goes on and on,
back to saber, then
again to me,
defends clergyman some more,
derails the thread,
denies having ever tried to policy lynch saber or DLA, puts the blame on me,
lies again about his first vote on me as he can't seem to decide whether he voted me seriously or to make me answer why I think hewitt is scummy which I stated over 20 pages ago.
TL;DR
-Neto's suspicions amount to DLA, Ellibereth and saber because they are easy lynches, and myself because I didn't give him an excuse to hammer hewitt.
-He outright lies several times about his first vote on me, trying to reconstruct the past into fitting whichever way he comes off looking the least scummy
-He buddies up with clergyman many times
-He derails the thread to belittle Ellibereth and saber
Basically, his entire play amounts to "saber, DLA, Ellibereth and CSL are bad players, and I'm angry at ABR". A monkey would have done a better job scumhunting, I swear.
Now I urge all of you to wait for KittyMo and Ojanen to come back before hammering. We still have 10 days until deadline and I want to see at least a little something from Kitty's slot.
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
