Open 184: Friends and Enemies Mafia (Over)

saberwolf · Post Post #725 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:58 pm

farside22 wrote:
Netopalis wrote:Elibereth: You're a girl until you earn the right to have a username that confuses your physical gender with your preferred presented gender.
now, now don't quibble because he corrected you about his gender. No need to for this comment in the least.

Double FoS: Neto

, for ad hoc fallicy

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #726 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:59 pm

TL;DR

Page 29 is fluff, page 28 is where SerialClergyman claims scum. Vote him off to hell when you please.

SerialClergyman · Post Post #727 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:01 pm

I aksed Albert to reserve me a place on the Neto wagon so I could bus Neto.

Albert bizarrely seems to think that rather than an intended joke I made deliberately, this was instead a slip because I was distracted and I outed my being scum to the world without realising it.

I want him to confirm his view.

SerialClergyman · Post Post #728 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:01 pm

Albert - is that a yes? You seriously believe that? This is actually very important.

Ellibereth · Post Post #729 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:02 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:TL;DR

Page 29 is fluff, page 28 is where SerialClergyman claims scum. Vote him off to hell when you please.

Meh...I think he was joking...keeping my vote on Neto.

Shotty to the Body · Post Post #730 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:06 pm

SerialClergyman wrote:Albert - is that a yes? You seriously believe that? This is actually very important.

I sincerely doubt you'll receive a direct answer from him on that. Rereading the last couple pages now...

SerialClergyman · Post Post #731 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:09 pm

It won't be for lack of trying.

Shotty to the Body · Post Post #732 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:17 pm

Well, Albert has successfully ignored most direct questions this game so far despite attempts to the contrary. I need to reread Neto and someone else, I don't know how I feel about bandwagoning SC, the 'slip' just feels like another argument based on the way he posted rather than what he posted, it's clearly tongue in cheek.

I would like to point out that DLA's absence for this entire debate was awesome.

SerialClergyman · Post Post #733 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:24 pm

Aaaaaaalbert....

This is a significant point. If you're pushing your wagon saying I've claimed scum, have the balls to come out here and say that you honestly believe that was an unintentional slip.

And even more importantly, have the balls to reassess your position if it's obviously based on a falsehood.

Netopalis · Post Post #734 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:52 pm

Shotty to the Body wrote:Well, Albert has successfully ignored most direct questions this game so far despite attempts to the contrary.

Yeah, this has kinda been my point. Does nobody else find this action scummy? Is it not also scummy that he keeps attacking those who ask him direct questions? It's almost like he doesn't want to answer them because he has something to hide....

SerialClergyman · Post Post #735 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:06 pm

Just wait a little while. Albert is a lot of things but not prepared to answer questions about his position isn't one of them. I'm sure he'll give me a direct answer soon enough.

Netopalis · Post Post #736 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:26 pm

Funny. He doesn't seem to have been prepared to answer questions for the last 15-odd pages that I've been haranguing him for them.

SerialClergyman · Post Post #737 (ISO) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:32 pm

While I'm on this tack - was this serious as well, Albert?

Albert B. Rampage wrote:Farside, I'm sorry on Shotty's behalf. Now check this out:

SerialClergyman wrote:Yeah, look, Elli just rained on my parade pretty damn hard to be honest... Are the mafia daytalkers in this game? I wouldn't put it past you to have organised that just to put me in my place...
Scummy as hell. Clergyman, you've been stroking my e-dick all game praising me as town and talented, and here you accuse me of being scum with Ellibereth. For your information, there is no day-talking in this setup, but your quick, careless turnaround is proof that you're a scumbag mascaraing in sheep's clothing.

Unvote, vote clergyman

Farside, you have to choose. Am I right about him, or are you going to defend SC?

dramonic · Post Post #738 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:17 am

The Ninth Votecount: Back to Point A!

DarkLightA (2): Hewitt, SttB
saberwolf (2): Ojanen, DarkLightA
Netopalis (1): Ellibereth
SttB (1): SerialClergyman
ABR (1): Netopalis
SerialClergyman (3): ABR, Farside, Saberwolf

Not Voting (2): KittyMo, Kikuchiyo

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch

Deadline is the 23rd at 23:59!

Note that I would appreciate if you can avoid spending a complete page on a random tangent like musical footwears...

DarkLightA · Post Post #739 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:19 am

dramonic wrote:
Mod Poll!
Considering the game began on the 19th of november, you guys have been given 5 weeks til the deadline.

Question: Do you want a closer deadline?

no.

I get this funny feeling with SC & Elli:

SC wrote:Ellibereth is scum. That is an epic case of hold on for the ride bandwagoning. His entire play has been 'I agree'. He used to think Hewitt was scummy when ABR did, now he doesn't. Then he uses a post hewitt made about Neto to attack Neto? No answer for where the suspicion of hewitt went - just disappeared :/

The only one he used "is scum" on. Not "is probably scum". Was this a way to separate the two of them? Later he clears up the differences with

SerialClergyman wrote:Yeah, look, Elli just rained on my parade pretty damn hard to be honest... Are the mafia daytalkers in this game? I wouldn't put it past you to have organised that just to put me in my place...

Seems quite scummy to me.

DarkLightA · Post Post #740 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:20 am

EBWOP:

Unvote
VOTE: SC

saberwolf · Post Post #741 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:25 am

DLA: your whole case is pretty BS.

DarkLightA · Post Post #742 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:26 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:You sound like a broken record, Net.

Bad pun

@Elli: Wtf happened to you?
@saber: Why are you going on about things that aren't related to the game? Once in a while is enough. Neto already claimed that place.

DarkLightA · Post Post #743 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:50 am

saberwolf wrote:DLA: your whole case is pretty BS.

So are yours...

Oh sorry, I forgot you haven't made any!

DarkLightA · Post Post #744 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:59 am

quoting saber in the theme list:

/in for malthusis ' game
/in for ortolan's game
/in for budja's game

Apparently he's not taking this site seriously.

saberwolf · Post Post #745 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:03 am

DarkLightA wrote:quoting saber in the theme list:
/in for malthusis ' game
/in for ortolan's game
/in for budja's game
Apparently he's not taking this site seriously.

where have you been? We've been over this already, in case you didn't know

farside22 · Post Post #746 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:23 am

saberwolf wrote:DLA: your whole case is pretty BS.

Hi pot,
Yo pot! This is kettle man. WTF are you thinking?

saberwolf · Post Post #747 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:26 am

farside22 wrote:
saberwolf wrote:DLA: your whole case is pretty BS.
Hi pot,
Yo pot! This is kettle man. WTF are you thinking?

Hey kettle, this is pot, see any difference between you and me? How about between me and me? That's what I thought

Just because I don't have a case doesn't make my point any less valid.

Besides, how is that any different from my usual anti-town playstyle?

DarkLightA · Post Post #748 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:02 am

saberwolf wrote:Besides, how is that any different from my usual anti-town playstyle?

Do NOT use that as an argument.

saberwolf · Post Post #749 (ISO) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:04 am

DarkLightA wrote:
saberwolf wrote:Besides, how is that any different from my usual anti-town playstyle?
Do NOT use that as an argument.

oh but I AM!

What now?

Get back to the game. Arguing is scummy when it's off topic.