farside22 wrote:What? *puts hand to head* I'm scared when I see people who use others style of play as an example and a term.
I used SensFan as an example because of a specific game I played with him where I was town, he was scum, I called him out on something and he responded irrationally and obnoxiously in kind of the same manner ABR did. I was lynched, flipped town and he went on to win the game as scum. Open 121 in case you were interested.
farside22 wrote:Okay hewitt how is it that telling people to have a discussion sparks conversations?
I didn't just "tell people" to have a discussion, I purposely said things in order to try and spark conversation and at first it failed miserably and then worked wonderfully. Whether or not said latter conversations where productive is questionable but I started them with the intent of productivity.
farside22 wrote:2) again how is it that asking people to have to disagree with you spark any conversation when you don't tell people what they are to disagree with.
What's the point of asking a question and then saying hey this is how I want you to respond? Same difference.
farside22 wrote:I pointed specifically to ABR because he was one of the more vocal players in the game
that was not your case on him at all in fact you said just the opposite about him in your case. In fact you stated this about him
Reading all the players in ISO I think it's pretty clear that ABR has been and most likely will be the most useless player in this game.
You're apparently not quite understanding the point or deliberately ignoring what else I've said about the decision to point out ABR. I didn't point him out JUST because he was one of the more vocal players in the game. I picked him out because he was a one of the most vocal players who had not sincerely made an attempt to start or carry productive conversation. That, to me, is uselessness. A very vocal player posting a lot of fluff and nothing substantial is useless.
farside22 wrote:That's pretty harsh considering others where not exactly playing this game at full throttle.
If I was going to start conversation I was going balls-out firestarting. I was sick of checking in to this thread and seeing three more posts of V/LA or yeah...this game is going nowhere...
farside22 wrote:I feel that vote of yours (against Ellibereth) is like a person who just got caught trying to make a bad case and trying to do a 180 to salvage yourself.
That really doesn't bother me, how you scumhunt is your own business but if we're not going to see eye to eye then I'm going to forget you and do this damn thing myself.
farside22 wrote:One thing I will agree with there is more here then those non contributors who dont' add anything to this game but there really is more then one person so your vote and logic is faulty.
Can't vote multiple people unfortunately so I have to assess which one I feel is most likely to be scum based off their separate actions. It's where less concrete reasonings such as intuition, speculation, and mannerisms come in to play.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:I think what you meant to say was "
I feel that lynching ABR is impossible today.
"
That was silly. Go read Large Normal 92, I start in on Page 13. Impossible lynches mean nothing to me.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:Of the 9 active players, 9 have either expressed a willingness to hammer you (kiku, Neto), drawn suspicion on you in one form or another (farside, DLA), or outright placed their vote on you (everybody else).
Is this supposed to intimidate me? This is the internet bud, I'm not going to get knifed in the heart during the middle of night, nothing to be scared of.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:The problem here, is that you're barraged from all sides and at two dangerous inches from a sudden death
The problem with this here is that you're trying to insinuate that I'm backed into a corner and I'm not. Players accumulate votes and then the bandwagon dies, it's the way of the game and it would be silly to be scared of that.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:I will accept an unconditional surrender of you, hewitt, to me, Albert. If you swear fealty to me, we can hunt down
Netopalis
. What do you say?
Neveeerrrr
DarkLightA wrote:CSL wrote:HOWEVER, this doesn't mean I'm done with you, hewitt.
Also, if anyone sees a flaw with his statement, I will switch my vote back to him...
Way to back up the vote..
Hey, this is better play, eh?
Well that was an excellent way for CSL to decide to change his mind and flip sides without it seeming random. That was a scummy move on CSL's part.
