Open 184: Friends and Enemies Mafia (Over)

[hewitt]

Anything, I really don't care honestly as long as it starts discussion SOMEHOW.

[Shotty to the Body]

unvote vote Yarmond

Policy lynch the person with no posts, and GO!

[CSL]

Vote: Yarmond

Doing the mod a favor and not troubling him with finding a replacement for the AWOL Yarmond...

[Albert B. Rampage]

unvote, vote Yarmond

RECLAIM THE SPIRIT OF MAFIA!

[kikuchiyo]

Unvote, Vote: Yarmond

This is fun!

[Shotty to the Body]

Moar votes or a post explaining why you think this is a bad idea, now please.

[farside22]

Moar votes or a post explaining why you think this is a bad idea, now please.

I don't see how voting out a person who never showed up helps the town.

[saberwolf]

keeping him around doesnt exactly halp in lylo either :/

unvote; vote: Yarmond

Drunken vote FTW!

[hewitt]

saberwolf we won't be in LYLO...

[saberwolf]

but bringing him any further in the game as a no show doesnt help, is what I'm saying.

[saberwolf]

but bringing him any further in the game as a no show doesnt help, is what I'm saying.

[hewitt]

I'm really not all that opposed to a Yarmond lynch considering we've got nothing else going on for us. Lurker lynches just always kind of bother me because we are probably going to hit town and that's just never really a good thing obviously.

[saberwolf]

who would you support in a lynch if not any lurkers then? Who stands out to you that is active and why?

[hewitt]

I just said I'm fine with a Yarmond lynch but at the same time there's that nagging in the back of my head like damn...we're probably not going to hit scum here. And of course that would bother me.

[saberwolf]

I just said I'm fine with a Yarmond lynch but at the same time there's that nagging in the back of my head like damn...we're probably not going to hit scum here. And of course that would bother me.

QFT.

However, we are two people hewitt. We can be the difference between this lynch and another. If you really feel that somebody else needs to be lynched, and show me a good reason why to support it, I'll gladly join you in finding someone more comfortable. It's true that a lurker isn't much good for an information lynch, but a lurker doesn't help us either.

[hewitt]

I think the best idea for today would be to lynch a player who is here yet hasn't shown any signs of being willing to contribute anything to the game.

Vote: Albert B. Rampage

He's done absolutely nothing so far this game but ask pointless questions to other players and has not provided any original thoughts to the game. He doesn't even respond to the answers of the pointless questions that he's asking. Reading all the players in ISO I think it's pretty clear that ABR has been and most likely will be the most useless player in this game.

If the vote's on Yarmond as a policy lynch for not contributing anything then I'm going to vote for the even worse offender, the player who's here and posting and still not contributing.

[saberwolf]

sounds good to me

vote: Albert B. Rampage

Al, please come and defend yourself against these allegations. Why should we remove our votes?

[hewitt]

Keep in mind also CSL could have the same offense attributed to him as well. Although he's only been in the game for three days, so it's a tiny bit more excusable.

And Shotty to the Body is just as bad as ABR when it comes to posting without any true content. A lynch on either one of them is perfectly acceptable and I would back either one.

[DarkLightA]

Unvote
Vote: Saber

Way to BW.

[saberwolf]

Unvote
Vote: Saber

Way to BW.

^_^

[DarkLightA]

=)

[Albert B. Rampage]

Unvote, vote Saber

You're just voting whoever ppl tell you to.

FOS: hewitt

Yarmond is even more useless yet you don't vote him.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Also, this is my meta, so stick that vote up yours. Ask Neto.

[hewitt]

Unvote, vote Saber

You're just voting whoever ppl tell you to.

FOS: hewitt

Yarmond is even more useless yet you don't vote him.

Yes, GREAT idea ABR, let's vote the player who's going to be replaced anyway instead of the player who actually is in the game yet actively chooses not to contribute anything original, thought-provoking, or helpful. Nice OMGUS though, my vote is reinforced by those posts. Meta is not an excuse, clearly.

[Albert B. Rampage]

You haven't done shit all game. This is you:

"OK LETS CREATE DISCUSSION GUYS."

"LETS SPARK DISCUSSION."

"YEP YEP, AS LONG AS WE FIND A PLAN THAT MAKES DISCUSSION."

Bla bla bla.......some theory about fake voting......in other words, NOTHING. You have contributed NOTHING.