Kingdom Hearts Mafia - Game Over!

Shotty to the Body · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:01 pm

RayFrost wrote:What I find fun is how DisCode has completely vanished from posting.

I agree.

Prod DisCode

if possible.

Gorrad · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:23 pm

I see Vaya's defense of DisCode, while wrong, to honestly be town in intent. The wagon on her has my seal of disapproval.

Sir Chris · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:23 pm

DragonsofSummer wrote:Ah but Chris when my main point for attacking you was that you had posted very little with no content. I at least have let my thoughts be known, and its not hypocritical because of this. The reason I left your case is because you have changed the way you are playing now with the reasoning that you have some free time today. Which is supported by the fact that you have been interacting as opposed to saying nothing.

Not exactly. I said Gorrad didn't look good in just about the same way you said I didn't look good. Also I am glad you agree that my reason is sound, as it is the truth, but it doesn't mean your actions have been less scummy. Now you must do what I did and come out into the light more and start posting, because at the moment we have precious little from you.

Cobalt · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:22 am

this thread has far below the recommended dose of malthusis.

Papa Zito · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:31 am

RayFrost wrote:Issue with foil case:

it could be applied to other people in this game.

Not exactly. Check his response to what I posted and tell me what you think.

Slicey wrote:foilist13 has requested replacement.

.......

Sir Chris wrote:Wait, are you saying I had a bad case?

What was wrong with it? While I don't like being voted, it wasn't the driving reason behind my logic.

It was pretty obvious that you went back to look at him after your vote. Your reaction was classic OMGUS.

Cobalt wrote:this thread has far below the recommended dose of malthusis.

We have several blatant lurkers that need to contribute or die.

Shotty to the Body · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:04 am

So follist-scum or follist-town replaces out because he comes under pressure? We could policy lynch a lurker on D1, I'd go for zwet.

Gorrad · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:49 am

No bleedin' policy lynches. ><

DisCode · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:00 am

Back, though fully back starting tomorrow.

Gorrad · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:01 am

Good. Fullclaim or die, plskthx.

Papa Zito · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:33 am

Gorrad wrote:No bleedin' policy lynches. ><

I've lynched way too many lurker scum good sir.

Zwet's a good choice Shotty. His silence is deafening.

Shotty to the Body · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:33 am

Gorrad wrote:No bleedin' policy lynches. ><

Why?

Gorrad · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:56 am

A policy lynch, by definition, applies to anyone. All lurkers, all liars....policy lynches are scum tactics designed to distract the town from people who are acting scummy (Like DisCode) and instead oversimplify with a cute saying like 'LAL' specifically created to make people not THINK about lynches, and just go with the policy.

That said, Zwet's far from the worst lynch. However, he ALWAYS posts very little content (though more often than he is at the moment, I'll admit), and that's not a damn good reason to lynch him.

Slicey · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:01 am

Sir Pent replaces foilist13.

Slicey · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:09 am

"I knew. But I was too stubborn to accept it. It's always the same. I try to wrap my mind around things my heart already knows, only to fail."

So for the people who are defending Discode are seriously defending a miller claim who's play is generally considered bad (If you do not think his play is bad, explain to me how claiming ability usage under no duress and for no gain is a good play).

Now granted he claimed at least another ability. I think the fact that he claimed miller and has played poorly warrant a claim and flavor evaluation at the very least.

Speculation about character is still stupid. Musing the possibility of it in the thread is even stupider.

@Cobalt

1: All I can say is that I am seeking help.

2: My restriction gets spot checked by the mod. Although its not limited except in the sense of actuality: The fact that I have to write it, then send to slicey, then wait for it to get posted, then read replies, then respond, takes awhile so my posts tend to be longer but more infrequent then usual. I can't quote people (nor any tags other then italics, its so my posts are different from the mods's own) so arguments are hard for me to clearly state.

3: Have you seen me bold anything? Nope. Guess what that means?

@Zito: I have information. Yes

I have opinions on people. Yes

Am I trying to pass off my opinions for fact? No. If you thought this then why not ask? (also the part you bolded was addressed to Plum, I cannot quote things so it makes things difficult). Would you have me not post opinions about people? Would you have me not share any information I can? I am sorry if I was confusing. I am not normally so confusing but its needed at the moment from my perspective. I just need someone to help me.

Why has no one said they would help me? I keep saying that I need to be helped and everyone ignores that. I need to be helped.....

saberwolf · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:11 am

I'll help you mysterious voice <3

what must I do?

Cobalt · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:13 am

saberwolf wrote:I'll help you mysterious voice <3

what must I do?

this

also, is there any chance of your PR being removed?

Papa Zito · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:28 am

Captain Ghostman wrote:Am I trying to pass off my opinions for fact? No. If you thought this then why not ask? (also the part you bolded was addressed to Plum, I cannot quote things so it makes things difficult). Would you have me not post opinions about people? Would you have me not share any information I can? I am sorry if I was confusing. I am not normally so confusing but its needed at the moment from my perspective.

Nice twisting there. Yeah I'm going to ask a ton of questions to a severely PR'd player.

If you are posting "x is in the light" or "the light is dim in y" how am I supposed to know if these statements come from role-based fact or are simply thread-based interpretation? (I'm ignoring the possibility that you're lying ofc) It seems a trivial matter to delineate which statements are which. Since you didn't bother to do so it does seem like you did this deliberately.

Mystery Lifeguard wrote:Why has no one said they would help me? I keep saying that I need to be helped and everyone ignores that. I need to be helped..... [/i]

Help you how? Help you do what?

Cobalt · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:28 am

lawl nice quote tags

Gorrad · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:29 am

Apparently it has to be the exact words.

I'll help you!

Papa Zito · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:37 am

Gorrad wrote:Apparently it has to be the exact words.

I'll help you!

YOU FOOL YOU'VE DOOMED US ALL.

Evil Choir wrote:Veni, veni, venias
Ne me mori facias
Veni, veni, venias
Ne me mori facias...

xRECKONERx · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:54 am

@Mysterious Voice:

I'll help you.

SirPent · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:14 am

I'll help you.

Hello Everyone btw, rereading and catching up, any questions I need to answer pronto of my predecessor?

Cobalt · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:16 am

who's your scumpartner?

SirPent · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:24 am

Cobalt wrote:who's your scumpartner?

Was that directed at me? If so my partner

assuming I have one

must be you :p haha

saberwolf · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:27 am

Apparantly Cobalt is bad at stating those he is addressing...

...wait, I already knew that.