look at his post history, I can't reference ongoing gamesYosarian2 wrote:Ok, how so?ortolan wrote:do your research please, Bogre always acts like this;
Irrelevant because the information rite gave out didn't serve to make him look scummy anyways.DoS (105) wrote:The offending question was your own one which you added:DragonsofSummer wrote:Here is the problem Ort.I was asked to answer that question.Try reading the thread before you jump to conclusions. Vala asked me whether I would, so I answered her question.
DoS (41) wrote:A quick reactionary question? Do we know for sure that we are unable to shoot ourselves anyway? It isn't stated that we can't, and that would be one hell of a blow to the town IMO (A day with no lynch except worse because of how this game works).Yer I'll bet.DoS (105) wrote:As for your second point, saying me putting we in my statement is scummy, thats grasping at straws and ludicrous.
No, I associate them with being defensive and self-explanatory, which you were, and I didn't say "giving out information" is a scum-tell, I said you looked like you looked like you were trying really hard to give the impression of giving out "neutral"-sounding information, and in fact were overacting the extent to which a townie would give out this sort of information.rite (120) wrote:Also, you first say you associate newb scum with being "defensive," then say you associate them with giving out information so they can be "evaulated 'fairly'". I don't understand; these two appear to be at odds.
yeahhhhhhhhhhhh...no. What I attacked him for wasn't his answer to a question, it was one who tacked on, so it's all moot.rite (120) wrote:Your attacking of DoS for answering a question represents either a fundamental misreading of the game, or an eagerness to attack SOMEONE that is often displayed by scum.
Xyl (122) wrote:This townie wants to be evaluated "fairly" and is perfectly happy to offer information that makes himself look scummy if it happens to be true.
I don't like the attempt to cut through my points with arbitrary philosophical method by rite and DoS. rite in particular strikes me as more scummy whereas I can still see DoS going either way. I will re-read Sarag if you like, Slicey.