Notice where my vote is at. Still very much want Ecto dead...and that's without a major catch up yet!Vi wrote:Starting... when?
I do think you're town Vi, but very pissed that you're just shooting.
Speaking as the Grateful Dead, being very pissed is a gamewide sentiment. Just imagine how I feel reading d_j 501.VP Baltar 500 wrote:I do think you're town Vi, but very pissed that you're just shooting.
h healed vi. now he's "waiting" for flip in order to vote. doesn't make sense. he thought vi was town enough to heal. why wait to vote? why not pursue his top suspect? he's not scumhunting. hasn't been since page 1. i was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt regarding his stubborness, but we're into this now. and i see no reason why scum wouldn't have a healer if they are the minority standing in a room full of trigger happy monkeys. its not 100%, but i'm not going to sit by and let the pot call the kettle black(i.e. don't tell me to play better when you're playing like shit) it makes more sense to me if he's scum.d3x wrote:It was more of a rhetorical question. What are you basing your theory off of?
I was thinking along the same lines myself. He would look quite the confirmed hero?don_johnson wrote:h healed vi. now he's "waiting" for flip in order to vote. doesn't make sense. he thought vi was town enough to heal. why wait to vote? why not pursue his top suspect? he's not scumhunting. hasn't been since page 1. i was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt regarding his stubborness, but we're into this now. and i see no reason why scum wouldn't have a healer if they are the minority standing in a room full of trigger happy monkeys. its not 100%, but i'm not going to sit by and let the pot call the kettle black(i.e. don't tell me to play better when you're playing like shit) it makes more sense to me if he's scum.d3x wrote:It was more of a rhetorical question. What are you basing your theory off of?
And here we are. What I really don't understand is your rational there. Vi had freaking claimed after she thought she was dying, so there was really no reason not to believe her (at least at that point). I also really don't like how you are instantly deflecting towards others now that she flipped.ecto wrote:Umm yeah. VP calling me scumbag. I think we'll wait for the results k thx.
You do realize this game generally works best when players make cases and convince others it is a good case. If the "case" you presented on Vi was as comprehensive as you claim it to be, why wouldn't you just post it and get her lynched? Nothing you have said accurately explains WHY it was necessary to shoot her.ecto wrote:Why would I reveal my case to Vi until I had enough of one to lynch? I'm not trying to alter Vi's behaviour, which is what you do when you don't like what someone is doing.
^Fearmongering....why the frak are people not lynching ecto?ecto wrote:Well he already shot twice and is out of bullets (at least for today), so he certainly cant shoot you. Your vote is somewhere else, so you don't look to be lynching him. What are you going to do? Wait until tomorrow when he could get another bullet to shoot you? If you don't care about the reveal, then why wait, especially if you are concerned that it could take us to night?
What I'm saying is your actions don't seem to match your convictions, and by waiting you're just gauging the town's reactions to your statement to Don. So either you meant it, and were just taunting Don when you could have waited (what purpose did that serve if his response didnt matter?) So...I can only assume you said it to decide whether town would approve or not. Why do you care? If he's scum, shoot him!
Really? What was thought provoking about it?don wrote:ecto has posted some thought provoking material recently and has also taken a position regarding vi(by shooting). this reads as possible town to me.
It isn't sidestepping the issue at all, because that is the exact accusation that is being made--that I'm somehow not living up to some perceived awesomeness I have as town (which probably isn't true in the first place) and therefore I'm scum. Like I said, I had something like five days in this game before I went V/LA....it's a ridiculous point to be making.porkchop wrote:@VP: In my opinion, Benmage has made a valid point that you aren’t playing as committed a game as expected from TownVP. It has nothing to do with an absence of posting lately, and everything to do with what you have contributed thus far. To portray this as being a case of “VP isn’t doing our work for us” is completely sidestepping the issue. Sorry if it is frustrating, but the quality of your play (here and elsewhere) is responsible.
Why are you laying it aside? Seems fairly relevant to me.porkchop wrote:What I find compelling (enough to unvote him since he demonstrated some pro-town play there, though subsequent posts have been a little disheartening) about Ben’s PBPA is that he’s identified you as attacking him for something that you yourself are guilty of. Laying aside the nm8 issue, which Bm deserved to be scrutinised for (despite what he says).
Actually, the accusation I made was that he was joining wagons for reasons he did not understand. It would be one thing for him to not express original thought, but to join them and not actually understand WHY people are voting on that wagon is very scummy. It is not the same accusation he levelled against me in the least.porkchop wrote:Your initial argument is that he joins wagons without original thought (which is an accusation that can be levelled against you in regards to Confid).
Hmmm....what do you make of my vote on Ecto and calling him a scumbag?porkchop wrote:What do you make of Ecto’s shooting?
I can't make heads or tails of this. So, you think he made a good case, but his claim is enough to kill him on? wtf. Also, this is well before Vi's alignment has been revealed. If you thought it was a case you at least weren't against (which is horribly vague), then why would you not want to see Vi's alignment first?Porkchop wrote:I’m thinking it might be a good idea to shoot, or lynch, Ecto at this point. I’m not against his case on Vi but his claim is a little troubling. I have a feeling that if scum can daykill they wouldn’t be bad shots and his claim could be cover for that.
play better if you're town...seriously. Your critical thinking skills this game are very dismal.ben wrote:And the comments towards VPB are dead on.
And what have you learned now?Confid wrote:Vi's flip should be interesting, but it makes me pretty ticked seeing as I revealed myself only to have her shot again.
You realize this has no bearing on your alignment, right?ecto wrote:Soldier bitch.
^More fearmongering and encouraging others to shoot.ecto wrote:Don also shot at a town Vi. I think he did it for much the same type of meta reasons that I did. Ben, you said you were going to shoot him regardless. What are you going to do now?
Reasoning? Also, who were you voting? I don't see you on the votecount last page.ecto wrote:Going to unvote for awhile.
No, it's not actually. I want you to elaborate because I very much disagree with your assessment of it. Tell me specifically which points he made that you felt were "thought provoking".dj wrote:vp: don't be an ass. that quote was from three pages ago. i referenced ecto's quote before that post. your question is stupid. his post was good and "thought provoking". asking "what is thought provoking about it?" is like me saying the sky is blue, and you saying, "what is blue about it?"
^^ this.Ectomancer wrote: Well he already shot twice and is out of bullets (at least for today), so he certainly cant shoot you. Your vote is somewhere else, so you don't look to be lynching him. What are you going to do? Wait until tomorrow when he could get another bullet to shoot you? If you don't care about the reveal, then why wait, especially if you are concerned that it could take us to night?
^^ this.ecto wrote:What I'm saying is your actions don't seem to match your convictions, and by waiting you're just gauging the town's reactions to your statement to Don.
^^ and this.ecto wrote: So either you meant it, and were just taunting Don when you could have waited (what purpose did that serve if his response didnt matter?)
^^ and of course this. all are very good points. in other words:ecto wrote: So...I can only assume you said it to decide whether town would approve or not. Why do you care? If he's scum, shoot him!
That was only when i thought he was absolutely shooting me. I'd much rather lynch him.Ectomancer wrote:Ben, you said you were going to shoot him regardless. What are you going to do now?
This is simply false. How can you say i didnt examine the Con wagon. Fully grasp it and his play on all levels, and acknowledge the reasoning for my vote. God your vote is even worse.VP Baltar wrote:Actually, the accusation I made was that he was joining wagons for reasons he did not understand. It would be one thing for him to not express original thought, but to join them and not actually understand WHY people are voting on that wagon is very scummy. It is not the same accusation he levelled against me in the least.porkchop wrote:Your initial argument is that he joins wagons without original thought (which is an accusation that can be levelled against you in regards to Confid).
Pork summed up exactly what happened this game between you and me, and my sentiments. Sorry if others think you're playing not to your potential. (Dont mean to for you to take it personally if you are, i just seen you pay better.) Why aren't you? I must ask myself this...and the conclusion i see...is scum.VP Baltar wrote:play better if you're town...seriously. Your critical thinking skills this game are very dismal.ben wrote:And the comments towards VPB are dead on.
VP Baltar wrote: ben can stop his bellyaching.
You take your lumps and move on. I'm sure you can find a game where Vi is town. Did you mean the one where Vi is town and I'm playing too? Or what? If so, why wouldn't you also want the ones where Vi is scum since a comprehensive meta would be what you want?VP Baltar wrote:And here we are. What I really don't understand is your rational there. Vi had freaking claimed after she thought she was dying, so there was really no reason not to believe her (at least at that point). I also really don't like how you are instantly deflecting towards others now that she flipped.ecto wrote:Umm yeah. VP calling me scumbag. I think we'll wait for the results k thx.
Did your growing wagon have anything to do with you shooting perchance?
Also, can you link me a game you were in where Vi was town, please.
Yes, post a case of actions she has yet to make, that makes a lot of sense, doesnt it? What you are demanding is that you instantly leap on anyone doing anything suspicious the very instant they do it. Play your own game of mafia. I'm going to feed them the rope and then hang them with it once it gets long enough and not before.VP Baltar wrote:You do realize this game generally works best when players make cases and convince others it is a good case. If the "case" you presented on Vi was as comprehensive as you claim it to be, why wouldn't you just post it and get her lynched? Nothing you have said accurately explains WHY it was necessary to shoot her.ecto wrote:Why would I reveal my case to Vi until I had enough of one to lynch? I'm not trying to alter Vi's behaviour, which is what you do when you don't like what someone is doing.
Fearmongering? I believe its called holding people to their stated convictions.VP Baltar wrote:^Fearmongering....why the frak are people not lynching ecto?ecto wrote:Well he already shot twice and is out of bullets (at least for today), so he certainly cant shoot you. Your vote is somewhere else, so you don't look to be lynching him. What are you going to do? Wait until tomorrow when he could get another bullet to shoot you? If you don't care about the reveal, then why wait, especially if you are concerned that it could take us to night?
What I'm saying is your actions don't seem to match your convictions, and by waiting you're just gauging the town's reactions to your statement to Don. So either you meant it, and were just taunting Don when you could have waited (what purpose did that serve if his response didnt matter?) So...I can only assume you said it to decide whether town would approve or not. Why do you care? If he's scum, shoot him!
To the non-biased? Plenty.VP Baltar wrote:Really? What was thought provoking about it?don wrote:ecto has posted some thought provoking material recently and has also taken a position regarding vi(by shooting). this reads as possible town to me.
I'd prefer to keep him around until it becomes clear we need to look under that rock. For me, VP looks way to much like he knew Vi was town before he flipped.don_johnson wrote:ecto: let's lynch confid. i don't understand why he thinks vi's flip would be any more "interesting" after he used his healing powers to save vi in the first place. on top of that his play has been horrible and his tremendous overreaction to the simple one word question "why?" was downright laughable. if not confid, then who? my second choice would be benmage with vp knocking on the door.
I don't think I answered this adequately. Why? Because IVP Baltar wrote:Nothing you have said accurately explains WHY it was necessary to shoot her.
This came out of no where. Is this a general feeling you're getting or based on something specific? If it is the later, please link to the posts.Ecto wrote:VP looks way to much like he knew Vi was town before he flipped.