If it is, it is.Pomegranate wrote:Did you mean to vote SB? Because you probably shouldn't do it in a quote, and the tags were messed up anyway.
Is your (would-be) vote on her meant to be pressure?
If it isn't, it isn't.
Either way, I am doing so.
I don't even follow what you said >.<mikeburnfire wrote:So.... your vote on Snow Bunny, which was meant to be pressure, may or may not be pressure, and you want to vote her and are okay with being on her lynch for no reason, just as long as you aren't the hammer on the lynch.
Did I phrase your scatter-shot logic aptly?
Reasons?crypto wrote:I don't think the Bunny wagon is lame.
Nope. Third party reads different from scum (albeit not always). Also, neutral =/= scum. Neutral means that I'm yet to get a town/scum read on the person. But that as well open the possibility of third party.elvis_knits wrote:No, this does not make sense. Third party, SK, is a type of scum. So a person should be reading scummy to you in order for you to start contemplating what type of scum. Neutral is not a deisgnation for scum.snow bunny wrote:I say that I'm not getting either a town or scum feeling from mufasa. Is that that hard to understand? It means I'm getting a neutral reading. Which means that I could lean towards third party. Hard?
Is this a pressure vote, or are you just buttering up to Crypto?Snow White wrote:Until then im going to oblige Crypto in the AGOI hunt and
Vote a Girl On The Internet