TheButtonmen wrote:So when you asked me about my thoughts on your reaction I directed you to where i had already posted my thoughts. If I didn't mention something there it's because I didn't notice anything else worth mentioning.
But when I asked specifically about the content, you directed me back to the part about post length et al, which is not what I asked. Why didn't you just say "I didn't notice anything worth mentioning" then?
TheButtonmen wrote:Now if you have a specific thing your curious about then ask it, otherwise I'm done responding to you repeating yourself in long wall of text after wall of text.
I've only had to repeat myself because you kept missing the part about content, which you now have cleared up (finally); that being you noticed nothing worth commenting.
As for specific questions, you never answered me when I asked what you were fishing for (or what you were hoping to get) when you were eliciting a reaction from me?
ChiboSempai wrote:As for when I said not liking xvart's replies....
ummm.... (reading back)
"Nobody is "jester hunting." I asked a question about game setup."
While it wasn't bad (which is why I used the adjective particularly and not flat out, and why I didn't vote him), instead of saying something simple like I had just asked about the game set up, he had to add that no one is jester hunting which seemed a little pre cautious and definitely wanting no suspicion on him. I mean sure no one wants suspicion, but just the way he said it seemed kind of off.
I typed that the way I did for sensationalism's sake, hoping the reader would realize how ludicrous the entire conversation was (in my eyes); but I can see what you are saying.
xvart.