Still, I rather leave my vote on scum.
(Mod: Ha! Now you have to make twice your job! )
Just be glad you don't have to come up with the insults. That would probably tax your poor, miniscule mind
If you say so. I think withholding your opinion and votes is a lot more suspect. My pressuring of slicey helped lead to his elaborating a case on chaco, if his case was poor, I would have kept my vote on slicey, but since it wasn't, voting Chaco was entirely appropriate.RayFrost wrote:I'm more bothered by the following:MonkeyMan576 wrote:Yeah, note that someone made a convincing case that I agreed with, and that you agreed with? Why would I withhold my vote?
Chaco: OMGUS VOTE SLICEY!!!!
Monkey: VOTE SLICEY!!!
Slicey: here is the case
Monkey: oh snap, vote chaco!!!!
The voting slicey bit right after chaco does it is suspect.
Feeling 100% confident that slicey is not the recruiter is noted.Snow_Bunny wrote:Hmm... I'll believe the cult thing now. I've never played a game with a cult before, though. However, though one would think the anti-spiral claim can be from a cult leader, I don't think it is. A fakeclaim would have been better (wifom included). In fact, I believe its even more plausible that Slicey IS the cult recruiter. But that's not the case either. (I even liked the theory that Kamina could be a recruiter)
Eh, your voting him hardly did anything at all.MonkeyMan576 wrote:
If you say so. I think withholding your opinion and votes is a lot more suspect. My pressuring of slicey helped lead to his elaborating a case on chaco, if his case was poor, I would have kept my vote on slicey, but since it wasn't, voting Chaco was entirely appropriate.
I think it was a lot more detail. Certainly enough for a vote, as your vote showed...RayFrost wrote:Eh, your voting him hardly did anything at all.MonkeyMan576 wrote:
If you say so. I think withholding your opinion and votes is a lot more suspect. My pressuring of slicey helped lead to his elaborating a case on chaco, if his case was poor, I would have kept my vote on slicey, but since it wasn't, voting Chaco was entirely appropriate.
You voted slicey for a rather contrived reason and then he elaborated on his case and then you said "that's not good enough" and then he gave it in slightly more detail and then you vote switched.
It's suspicious.
Semi, yes. But I can argue against that easily. Total Despair. Anti-Spirals use methods to instill despair, fear, and hopelessness. Now, with that. Listen toSlicey wrote:It has to do with flavor. During the beginning of the second season, Anti-Spiral brainwashed Nia into helping him. Then, near the end of the show, Anti-Spiral succeeded in 'brainwashing' almost everyone for at least a brief time. Also, all of the characters in the show are spirals (except Anti-Spiral obviously.) So, it would make sense for Anti-Sprial to brainwash, or recruit, Spiral's to the Anti-Spiral side.
As for unclaimed abilities, I mean that he can recruit people into his Anti Spiral Cult.
I had intent to vote before that.MonkeyMan576 wrote:
I think it was a lot more detail. Certainly enough for a vote, as your vote showed...
Continuing from this:RayFrost wrote:I had intent to vote before that.MonkeyMan576 wrote:
I think it was a lot more detail. Certainly enough for a vote, as your vote showed...
In addition, I didn't vote for the dude making the casedirectly afterthe person I would then proceed to vote did the same.
I don't hold back my opinions, or votes, which are extentions of opinions. I don't usually vote strategically, that is, when it looks more or less scummy, I vote when my opinion changes. Waiting to vote sounds a lot more scummy, which is what you're doing...RayFrost wrote:I had intent to vote before that.MonkeyMan576 wrote:
I think it was a lot more detail. Certainly enough for a vote, as your vote showed...
In addition, I didn't vote for the dude making the casedirectly afterthe person I would then proceed to vote did the same.
Okay, I'll do your style then.Chaco wrote:I don't do OMGUSs. I do: your logic is terrible, and your assuming out the ass.
Have you watched Gurren Lagann?RayFrost wrote:Okay, I'll do your style then.Chaco wrote:I don't do OMGUSs. I do: your logic is terrible, and your assuming out the ass.
Your logic is crappy, and you are obv scum.
Now lynch yourself, already.
I hardly use my vote strategically, but nor do I vote EVERY TIME I think somebody needs to be pressured.MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't hold back my opinions, or votes, which are extentions of opinions. I don't usually vote strategically, that is, when it looks more or less scummy, I vote when my opinion changes. Waiting to vote sounds a lot more scummy, which is what you're doing...
Never heard of it before now.Chaco wrote: Have you watched Gurren Lagann?
Have you thought through Sliceys bull shit?
Would you rather you or Slicey die?
But if you wait to vote...you're not voting who you think is scum. How can we trust you if we think you're withholding your opinion or votes?RayFrost wrote:I hardly use my vote strategically, but nor do I vote EVERY TIME I think somebody needs to be pressured.MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't hold back my opinions, or votes, which are extentions of opinions. I don't usually vote strategically, that is, when it looks more or less scummy, I vote when my opinion changes. Waiting to vote sounds a lot more scummy, which is what you're doing...
I vote who I think is scum, and I'll pressure outside of that as I feel appropriate.
Oh, and chaco/monkey both attacking me at the same time is noted
Eh, noting your partner is attacking somebody and then attacking with them is very easy to do.Chaco wrote:Even 'if' we were scum we'd have no way to coordinate your said "same time attacking".
Appeal to ignorance much?
You imply that I waited to vote when, in fact, I only read the stuff just when I was voting. I caught slicey's extension and the like afterward. I have this other thing I do called playing games on newgrounds. It's quite fun.MonkeyMan576 wrote: But if you wait to vote...you're not voting who you think is scum. How can we trust you if we think you're withholding your opinion or votes?
Eeeeeehhhhh, I feel that there is a connection, thus I point out the perceived connection. Whether or not it is actually correct is YTBD, even if I believe it is.Chaco wrote:Then you have no clue what you're committing too in the slightest.
You admitted that you "intended to vote" earlier, but didn't. Therefore, you were withholding your vote.RayFrost wrote:You imply that I waited to vote when, in fact, I only read the stuff just when I was voting. I caught slicey's extension and the like afterward. I have this other thing I do called playing games on newgrounds. It's quite fun.MonkeyMan576 wrote: But if you wait to vote...you're not voting who you think is scum. How can we trust you if we think you're withholding your opinion or votes?
how can we trust you if we think you are scum?
Honestly, I don't see how I'm withholding my opinion when I'm not only voting chaco but also saying I'm suspicious of you and am thus engaging in actively posting with defense/attack at both ends.
Honestly, I find this to be quite fun.