1. My person doesn't have any overt villain roles so I think that would make sense.1. First of all, i'm unsure of whether scum will have actors that are usually one of the villains in the movies they act in, or whether they will have regular actor characters. I'm also unsure if the movies they play in are indicative of alignment, such as starring as villains in their movies. Therefore,
Do you think the scum will have villain acting-roles in the movies they have been provided with?
2. Second of all, I feel that my name/movies, as well as the Will Smith example one reveal nothing about what our movie roles can do. There is also a chance that scum have actor names/movies in which they are the antagonist in their movie. In my opinion, claiming our names/movies doesn't reveal anything about what they can do, and may prevent scum from having enough time to fake an actor/movies. Therefore,
Are you against a full actor name/movies starred-in claim
Let's see if the smart kids can figure out why.cateraction wrote:I'm going to have to resist the urge to quote movies so that people don't think I'm breadcrumbing. This will be hard.
I had already switched my vote to someone else at this point.curiouskarmadog wrote:vote MordyS, you leave my girl alone. You need to respect your elders, you know DGB is retiring age.
I may just have to replace out before I vomit.DrippingGoofball wrote:CKD...
Do you love me?
It's obvscum behavior from DoS. CKD is another story, he doesn't want to have to sleep on the couch.MordyS wrote:It's either obvscum behavior...
I'm not a smart kid.I'm going to have to resist the urge to quote movies so that people don't think I'm breadcrumbing. This will be hard.Let's see if the smart kids can figure out why.
Because scum would be the ones worrying about breadcrumbing? Personally I think scum would be the ones worrying about 
That's ridiculous. What is this "buddying?"I think CKD shouldn't bring any personal factors into his decisions of who is and isn't scum. I also find buddying, even if RVS stage, extremely scummy, no matter who it's from.
They're just having fun, and you're just trying to find something to criticize (you big meanie!). We all know people here turn on eachother at the slightest provocation (whether they're buddies or not!) Certainly sounds serious. So how exactly does DG know that CKD is town? Because he defended her in the RVS? (After the fact, btw.)DrippingGoofball wrote:So CKD... to answer your request.
I caught two scums, cateraction and MordyS, and maybe DoS, we'll see about him. I'm not sure yet whether I want to lynch them or adopt them.
milkshake, CKD, Psychologic and myself are town.
Not all players have posted content yet, so the above may change a little.
I'd prefer you look at stuff that actually has a bearing on alignment instead of acting like what people do with their silly votes is important.And what would you prefer, Milkshake? That we just hang out in RVS indefinitely?
It's people like you that make this forum the mosh pit that it is! In a normal stage there's maybe what? One "You voted for X so I'll vote for you" vote?
Exactly.It's RVS
Psychological's theoretical discussion (well it's interesting at least), cateraction's breadcrumbing (err, according to DGB, that is), and your desire to make something out of nothing!But hey, you tell me: What stuff actually has a bearing on alignment?
Woohoo, first scum found!MordyS wrote:DragonsofSummer wrote:Vote MordyS Voting DGB is a scum tell. That is all.This is bizarre btw.DrippingGoofball wrote:Psychologic is town, actually.
