Do you honestly think if scum is nudging someone they're gonna go,"Oh hey guys, I'm nudging you to lynch PLAYERNAME."Netopalis wrote:Yes, but inference only gets you so far. You also need explanation from the person acting.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
And yet you and DB are the scum. Chaco is SK. Done and over with. You're scum because you keep seeming to misrepresent me in a very bad fashion. DB is scum because he's just so damn flip floppy.Netopalis wrote:I think part of the problem is that SSK is a huge detriment to us. His vote will be wholly unpredictable, his posting erratic and his analysis lacking all but the very, very most shallow and basic of statements. He is devoid of intelligent contribution to the game, lacking in productivity and fully without merit as a player. He will not contribute, he will not advance the game, he will not help us win it. He is, in other words, a bump. He could be a town bump. He could be a scummy bump. Regardless, though, one thing is most certainly assured: he is, indeed, a bump.
By saying that I am "devoid of intelligent contribution" and "lacking in productivity".Netopalis wrote:How am I misrepresenting you? Does scumminess wholly revolve about how players feel about you? Honestly, I am really disappointed in you right now. I'm certain you can do better than this.
So when did I miss the part that scum usually meet this definition?Netopalis wrote:I think part of the problem is that SSK is a huge detriment to us. His vote will be wholly unpredictable, his posting erratic and his analysis lacking all but the very, very most shallow and basic of statements. He is devoid of intelligent contribution to the game, lacking in productivity and fully without merit as a player. He will not contribute, he will not advance the game, he will not help us win it. He is, in other words, a bump. He could be a town bump. He could be a scummy bump. Regardless, though, one thing is most certainly assured: he is, indeed, a bump.
I like, I like.Netopalis wrote:I think part of the problem is that SSK is a huge detriment to us. His vote will be wholly unpredictable, his posting erratic and his analysis lacking all but the very, very most shallow and basic of statements. He is devoid of intelligent contribution to the game, lacking in productivity and fully without merit as a player. He will not contribute, he will not advance the game, he will not help us win it. He is, in other words, a bump. He could be a town bump. He could be a scummy bump. Regardless, though, one thing is most certainly assured: he is, indeed, a bump.
I'd rather look for people meeting my definition of scum before looking at people not meeting my definition of town.Netopalis wrote:They don't *not* meet it either. He could very easily be town...but we'd never know from talking to him because he never says anything of substance. That's why I was originally on Chaco, though, because I feel fairly certain that he is actually scum. Both have to die, though.