Mini 867- TTGL Mafia: GAME OVER: Roles posted.

[Cobalt]

Yos + Sociopath + vi = 3. Chaco has 4?

Not sure I understand your point?

[Cobalt]

Yos + Sociopath + vi = 3. Chaco has 4?

Not sure I understand your point?

I was making sure that the three people -> four votes was not mod error and is due to a double or secret voter.

I have no idea. It makes perfect sense on my end. Not sure what your issue is.

[Jahudo]

Double voter doesn't make sense based on previous wagons. Secret voter could be possible, either town or scum I guess.

If its going to show up on the vote counts, we just have to be aware of it until we have a better idea of the how and why. Because of it, though, I have a mild suspicion on fl. Her comments inserted into posts feel overly coy in this situation.

That reminds me,
@Everybody: Do you think the mod is a player (ie: has a role PM/win condition) in this game? Why/why not?

My opinion: Yes. Why: See tarhalindur or natirasha's mind screw games, fl's own poof mafia marathon game.

[Cobalt]

Hmm... I agree with Jahudo about fl's comments being coy, but I'm not sure a mod wagon would do any good. Maybe one person could vote the mod and we'll see if it appears in the next vote count, and we can go from there.
Also, isn't tarh a backup/co-mod for this game?

[MonkeyMan576]

:shrug:, why not?

Unvote:
Vote: Forbiddanlight

[SocioPath]

Double voter doesn't make sense based on previous wagons. Secret voter could be possible, either town or scum I guess.

I just assumed that the vote counts on previous wagons were wrong.

Mainly because the mod said the votecount on previous wagons were wrong.

I apologize. I have made non critical mod errors in every past votecount. I will make sure future votecounts are correct

:shrug:, why not?

Unvote:
Vote: Forbiddanlight

Why not? Because if nothing happens, than its a no lynch, which gives scum like yourself and your buddy Chaco more time to play around during the night.

We should be lynching those that are scummy, and there are several people that are scummy.

Unvote
Vote: MonkeyMan576

[MonkeyMan576]

I'm not scum? I'm not sure where you get your reasoning from.

We have plenty of time left in the day and plenty of time to explore various hypothesis. Your insistance that we only play one way and only use one path isn't very logical or pro town.

[Cobalt]

I can't imagine the day ending on a no-lynch if we reach majority on a non-player. Wouldn't the votes just not count?

Rule 4a says otherwise

4a) Anyone or anything that reaches lynch count will be lynched, regardless of whether they are actually in the game or not.

[SocioPath]

Your insistance that we only play one way and only use one path isn't very logical or pro town.

Please describe this "one way" and "one path" to me.

I can't imagine the day ending on a no-lynch if we reach majority on a non-player. Wouldn't the votes just not count?

FL treats lynches of non-players, whether its the mod, or just not a player in the game, as a NO LYNCH.
SO STOP THE NO LYNCH DISCUSSION

UNVOTE
VOTE: COBALT

[MonkeyMan576]

Your insistance that we only play one way and only use one path isn't very logical or pro town.

Please describe this "one way" and "one path" to me.

I can't imagine the day ending on a no-lynch if we reach majority on a non-player. Wouldn't the votes just not count?

FL treats lynches of non-players, whether its the mod, or just not a player in the game, as a NO LYNCH.
SO STOP THE NO LYNCH DISCUSSION

UNVOTE
VOTE: COBALT

I am not advocating a no lynch. I just want to see what happens if I vote her.

Snow Bunny is at the top of my scum list right now for lurking.

[Cobalt]

Your insistance that we only play one way and only use one path isn't very logical or pro town.

Please describe this "one way" and "one path" to me.

I can't imagine the day ending on a no-lynch if we reach majority on a non-player. Wouldn't the votes just not count?

FL treats lynches of non-players, whether its the mod, or just not a player in the game, as a NO LYNCH.
SO STOP THE NO LYNCH DISCUSSION

UNVOTE
VOTE: COBALT

I didn't know FL treated votes that way, and I clearly am not advocating a no-lynch, so why are you voting me?

[Cobalt]

SocioPath, you have posted 8 times. You vote someone else in every post. Do you really find someone new scummy each time, or what?

[SocioPath]

Your insistance that we only play one way and only use one path isn't very logical or pro town.

Please describe this "one way" and "one path" to me.

I can't imagine the day ending on a no-lynch if we reach majority on a non-player. Wouldn't the votes just not count?

FL treats lynches of non-players, whether its the mod, or just not a player in the game, as a NO LYNCH.
SO STOP THE NO LYNCH DISCUSSION

UNVOTE
VOTE: COBALT

I didn't know FL treated votes that way, and I clearly am not advocating a no-lynch, so why are you voting me?

Unvote

Clearly my vote is misplaced, mainly because of THIS COMMENT:

I am not advocating a no lynch. I just want to see what happens if I vote her.

I just TOLD YOU what happens, and yet you still say 'WANT TO SEE', not 'WANTED TO SEE'. Meaning your desire is still in the PRESENT TENSE.

Vote: MonkeyMan576

Do you really find someone new scummy each time, or what?

OBVIOUSLY.
The scummy styles and the scummy players are coming out in droves in this game. IN DROVES.
Also because I WILL VOTE ANYONE WHO TRIES A NO LYNCH. LIKE YOU DID. BUT NOW YOU KNOW BETTER. OR SHOULD.

[Cobalt]

Post restriction? He has to attack and vote someone in each post? If I'm right do Vi next post.

[MonkeyMan576]

Sigh, talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.

Unvote:
Vote: Chaco

[Jebus]

Prod received, expect content in around 24 hours, or so.

[Vi]

I apologize. I have made non critical mod errors in every past votecount. I will make sure future votecounts are correct

Have you edited your previous vote counts?~ (preview edit: no... hm, wonder why~)

Still deciding whether I will or not.

Withholding comment on SocioPath for a moment.

Prod received, expect content in around 24 hours, or so.

Are you lying?~

Where is Seraphim?

Most of what has been going on since I last posted has been kind of useless as far as direct scumhunting goes tbh, so my reads haven't changed.

[Cobalt]

Monkeyman, are you aware that's L-1 on Chaco?

[MonkeyMan576]

Yes. Shouldn't I be?

[Cobalt]

You placed the vote without mentioning it. I usually see people calling for a claim or something when someone hits L-1.

[MonkeyMan576]

I figured it was obvious?

Claim now .

There you go.

[Jahudo]

@Monkeyman: why are you voting Chaco and not your top suspect?

[MonkeyMan576]

I'm not against the Chaco wagon, he seems to be kind of defensive, so I want to see where it goes. We need to have some leads in order to make an informed lynch, I figure I will press Snow Bunny after(if) Chaco claims.

[Cobalt]

Speaking of voting.

unvote

No good voting someone for not posting when they're on V/LA.

Vote: SocioPath

Please explain your jumpiness.

[Chaco]

I'm Anti Spiral Void, however, I am town. Think of me as an auto lyncher. I have a one time shot that allows me to lynch a person instantly. If you want me to prove this, I have no qualms with killing Socio.

Also, Forbs, just so you know. I won't be available a lot during weeks. And I apologize for that, but if you could note that Id appreciate it.

Also, wow at L-1 from V/LA.

Noted