Lets get this ball rolling, now lets see, who has 2 votes already?
Ahh rajrhcpfreak will do.
Lets give him 3 and see what happens.
Bloody stupid name anyway!
personally i find that scummy. so doing a real stupid move, proves that your scum because scum wouldnt do that.Dodgy wrote:And, lets get real here Brian, if I were scum, then i'd have to be either very brave or very stupid scum to make myself stand out so early on in the game.
While I would love it if my innocence was proven that easily (honestly, who wouldn't?), I will tell you right now I don't have double vote powers; it was a mod error that was fixed in the most recent vote count.kadath32 wrote:Since it is doubtful that the mod has given two votes to a member of the mafia, it seems that Brian is innocent if he indeed has two votes.
He was probably just a doc who was also a mason with another person. The other either had no special power or maybe our cop or a one-shot vig, though it might give an unfair advantage to the town if the doc knew who the cop was right out of the gate. I doubt that the masons had joint doc power. I think we just lost our doc last night, who happened to also be a mason.BrianMcQueso wrote:Also, I'm not exactly sure what MasonDoc is. I've seen pairs of night watchmen that lose 50% accuracy when one partner dies, maybe this is a doctor variation on that? I couldn't see two seperate doctors (each with their own protection) in a game this small, especially not masoned together.
He voted you to be jumping on a bandwagon, giving you four votes. Then he took a swipe at your name.rajrhcpfreak wrote:...i guess the real supicious person is Dodgy who is targeting me just because of my name.
Well, day 1 voting isn’t always logical, especially for the first bandwagon. I’ve seen stupider reasons used. The important thing is to promote discussion and get the game moving.BrianMcQueso wrote:Woah, 4 votes already? I mean, I understand the nature of provoking discussion, but usually it's based on something scummy, not being last to confirm.