Mini 865 -- Evil Eyes (Over)

[ZazieR]

Hoopla

, why no response to what Symbol stated about you?

[ZazieR]

Post 208 – With which points against Hoopla do you agree and why,

Reck

?

[ZazieR]

Post 211 – Why did you only point out Reck, while the guy whom I replaced did the same and actually in a joking way,

Iam

?
Also, not liking the last paragraph.

[ZazieR]

Post 220 – I don’t see the contradiction from Iam you’re stating to see,

Geek

[ZazieR]

Post 223 – Why did you ask for Reck in particular,

Symbol

?

[ZazieR]

Post 227 – Anything else you want to comment on of the stuff you’ve missed,

Julien

?

[ZazieR]

Not liking it that

Geek

requested replacement.

[ZazieR]

Post 245 – Why this vote,

Tubby

?

[Hoopla]

Oh for fuck sake. You didn't always use to be like this.

[Nuwen]

Stop.

Stop right now. I'm replacing out if I have to read any more of this shit. Put your catch up in one or two cohesive posts or don't bother at all.

[ZazieR]

So my scumlist is as follows:

Scum

Reck
Suave

Leaning scum

Tubby
Hoopla
Iam

Neutral

Julien
ekiM
ML

leaning town

Nuwen

town

Geek
Symbol

Vote Reck

[Nuwen]

That scumlist is meaningless after a page and a half of disjointed questions, plus "notes" and "not likes." Congratulations, Zaz, you've wasted pieces of both your life and mine.

Why, for example, am I leaning town if I'm pushing cases on both of your most town players? Do you think our interactions look like town vs. town? If so, why?

That's

useful information. Your stupid vague spam reveals nothing, aside from your inability to string more than one post together into a cogent analysis.

In fact...

Vote: ZazieR

.

This is a policy vote (one of my first on the site, I think). I am calling for Zaz's lynch for the salvation of this site's meta. That replace-in behavior needs to be purged from with fire. I never want to see it again.

[ZazieR]

Disagreeing is not a scumtell. Just because you see somebody else as scum than I do, doesn't make you scum to me.
I'm leaning town on you due to your general play.

Though policy lynch votes are scummy.

P.S. Not gonna change my style at all.

[Nuwen]

Disagreeing is not a scumtell.

No, but trying to get your town reads lynched

is

(or should be).

I've never had to throw down a policy vote in my mafia career. This should tell you something about how ineffective and irritating that slew of word vomit was.

[xRECKONERx]

Seriously, Zaz? Give it a fucking break, holy shit, most annoying post style ever.

In response to your questions:

Hoopla's post so far clearly focus on Suave, but I get the impression that she doesn't actually have him down as mafia, however anti-town or scummy she thinks he's acting. Which is weird. As for factoring in the out-of-left-field posting style, I would think scum are more inclined not to get experimental, which weakens my suspicion of her, but it's always dicey to read into those aspects. Meh.

That is what I agreed with specifically. Hoopla was tunneling on Suave, but didn't even seem convinced, herself.

Me telling Suave to stop using so many emoticons is me attempting to get an unbiased read on him. I have an automatic bias when people use emoticons, as it makes them seem scummier to me. So no, it wasn't coaching, it was me telling him to quit the excessive smileys. If you want to call it coaching, go ahead, but it wasn't.

What about this post bothers you, exactly?

Actually, why don't you like my FoS on Mac, either? Just stating "I don't like this" is not good enough.

And, once again, fuck this two pages of spam shit. Put it all in one post. I'm not going to continue to play a game where 1/6th of the pages are nothing but ZazieR's stupid fucking posts. Bah.

[ZazieR]

No, it's not a scumtell. Especially not in my case as it would have made many players in my games scum.

Sorry, don't care what you think about my playstyle. It has improved my scumhunting a lot. And that's what matters to me. I don't need the award of 'Best playstyle to deal with'.

[Nuwen]

Because you don't consider relativist stances like that alignment indicative, I'm calling your scum list arbitrary and vapid.

Use a bloody notepad or sticky notes application.

[ZazieR]

Sure, use the difficult words on the Dutch guy
Can you give me some normal English words instead?

[Nuwen]

http://dictionary.reference.com/

Spanish was my first language. If you play in English, speak English.

[ZazieR]

Reasons have been given. If you want clarification on one, just ask.
Don't know what you mean with 'dull'.

[xRECKONERx]

Way to ignore my post, Zaz.

[ekiM]

Zazie, your `style' of posting one thought per post is unacceptable. It is incredibly hard to read. There is no good reason not condense your thoughts into fewer posts.

Stop posting that way or I am requesting replacement.

[Symbol]

And I thought I was liable to spam the thread. Yikes.

Post 223 – Why did you ask for Reck in particular,

Symbol

?

Because I know he's always game for a wagon.

That scumlist is meaningless after a page and a half of disjointed questions, plus "notes" and "not likes."

Er, aren't questions, notes, and dislikes the crux of scum hunting? I'm not saying I like Zazie's style, but . . . I don't see the logic in lynching Zaz (at this point).

I don't need the award of 'Best playstyle to deal with'.

No, you don't, but if people with annoying styles are generally ignored, making them ineffective as townies.

---

In other news, scum read on Nuwen is solidifying with the Zazie vote (which she even admits to with the "In fact..." pretext), especially considering she openly concedes to having never policy-lynched. Whoa. If you're going to distract from the pro-town Geek wagon, at least try to disguise it.

Tubby looks scummy as well. Sort of irritating that his meta bails him out of suspicion.

[MacavityLock]

3 votes for geek came after his replacement request: ekiM, Reck, and tubby, bringing him to L-2 while the spot doesn't have a player behind it. What are you 3 hoping to accomplish?

----

You have to admit that that was just one post, compared to Symbol's more prodigious output.

I can admit that, but I challenge you to find a single post of Symbol's that was as long and useless as yours.

----

Zaz, that is not only incredibly difficult to read (separating all points across different posts, not even quoting the offending parts of the posts, sometimes failing to even address the question to anyone specific), it's also clearly anti-town. Give me one good way in which that entrance to the game is pro-town. (Continuing a meta is not a good excuse.)

As to your one question addressed to me:

Post 109 – How do you see this as coaching,

ML

?

I'm not reading that as rolefishing at all, as from reading Mr Suave's post it seems that he's asking us if he should claim or not.

Though in this time he's probably either thought up a fake claim or is just preparing to post his claim.

Bold is "Hey Reck, calm down with the rolefishing argument, because it doesn't read that way." Italics is "Hey Suave, come up with a fakeclaim immediately." Of course, I don't know if they're intended that way, but it's not hard to read them with that intention.

Now I need to dig into the rest of your post-vomit to see if there's anything worth questioning.

[Symbol]

Bold is "Hey Reck, calm down with the rolefishing argument, because it doesn't read that way."

Or it's "My opinion is that it isn't fishing, period."

Italics is "Hey Suave, come up with a fakeclaim immediately." Of course, I don't know if they're intended that way, but it's not hard to read them with that intention.

Why would he need to tell Suave? Suave's brain isn't going to implode if people tell him to claim.