budja using brain wrote:@don, if you are confirmable, it is through some ability/role info we haven't seen yet (don't claim!).
not complaining. responding to the insults and thoughtless debate.budja wrote:But seriously, you are not today's lynch so stop complaining.
Grouping me with Jebus for lack of content? Where is Adel with a post/word count chart...Budja wrote:Scum->Town.
Konowa
Debonair Danny DiPietro
chamber
AlmasterGM, Locke Lamora
don_johnson (recently moved)
Jebus, SocioPath
Sotty7
Cyberbob
charter
Nothing exceptional here but this is very basically what I am thinking. Almaster, Locke due to absence/gut. don is now neutral. Neither Jebus or Socio have posted much. Sotty is not active but has mostly good logic. Cyber,charter are actively scumhunting and make good logic.
I love how you KNOW you're useless, but you don't care.chamber wrote:I assume the thread is so quiet because we are waiting on a konowa claim?
Not supporting the wagon here, just wondering why the thread seems to have slowed so much (not that I'm helping).
Also, vote for LL!
I care, its why I made that post at all. When I said (not that I'm helping) I simply meant that I also hadn't posted in a while.AlmasterGM wrote:I love how you KNOW you're useless, but you don't care.chamber wrote:I assume the thread is so quiet because we are waiting on a konowa claim?
Not supporting the wagon here, just wondering why the thread seems to have slowed so much (not that I'm helping).
Also, vote for LL!
Still waiting for Konowa to claim.
What do you think youchamber wrote:I care, its why I made that post at all. When I said (not that I'm helping) I simply meant that I also hadn't posted in a while.
Define white noise.Cyberbob wrote:What do you think youchamber wrote:I care, its why I made that post at all. When I said (not that I'm helping) I simply meant that I also hadn't posted in a while.havecontributed to the game beyond white noise and requests for claims?
White noise is pretty self-explanatory, but I'll bite. In this context "white noise" refers to posts that don't really serve any purpose; they don't help to catch scum, they don't offer any meaningful points of view on a situation... they're just empty words whose usefulness is entirely superficial.chamber wrote:Define white noise.Cyberbob wrote:What do you think youchamber wrote:I care, its why I made that post at all. When I said (not that I'm helping) I simply meant that I also hadn't posted in a while.havecontributed to the game beyond white noise and requests for claims?
Cyberbob wrote:White noise is pretty self-explanatory, but I'll bite. In this context "white noise" refers to posts that don't really serve any purpose; they don't help to catch scum, they don't offer any meaningful points of view on a situation... they're just empty words whose usefulness is entirely superficial.chamber wrote:Define white noise.Cyberbob wrote:What do you think youchamber wrote:I care, its why I made that post at all. When I said (not that I'm helping) I simply meant that I also hadn't posted in a while.havecontributed to the game beyond white noise and requests for claims?
I don't see the point of this line of questioning if this is where you were going. If I thought something was wrong with my no case style I wouldn't use it. If you thought my no case style would impair my judgment when it came to my own posts why would you direct the question at me in the first place?Cyberbob wrote:You don't see anything wrong with your no-cases playstyle. QED.chamber wrote:Nearly all my posts are not white noise under that description imo.
I actually didn't have that comeback in mind when I started down this track; it just came to mind when I saw "imo".chamber wrote:I don't see the point of this line of questioning if this is where you were going. If I thought something was wrong with my no case style I wouldn't use it. If you thought my no case style would impair my judgment when it came to my own posts why would you direct the question at me in the first place?Cyberbob wrote:You don't see anything wrong with your no-cases playstyle. QED.chamber wrote:Nearly all my posts are not white noise under that description imo.
To judge what I've done that has advanced the towns win condition is nearly impossible at this point. You can only judge what I've tried to do as I've been ignored on a couple suggestions, and no one has been lynched yet. If you are looking at what I tried to do then go read me in iso. If you are looking for what I've conclusively done that's protown the only thing I can offer is a minor defense of don who appears to be town atm. Day 1 I feel its more important to judge based on perceived intentions than outcomes. Town are lacking information and thus will make mistakes more times than not.Cyberbob wrote:I actually didn't have that comeback in mind when I started down this track; it just came to mind when I saw "imo".chamber wrote:I don't see the point of this line of questioning if this is where you were going. If I thought something was wrong with my no case style I wouldn't use it. If you thought my no case style would impair my judgment when it came to my own posts why would you direct the question at me in the first place?Cyberbob wrote:You don't see anything wrong with your no-cases playstyle. QED.chamber wrote:Nearly all my posts are not white noise under that description imo.
You didn't really answer my question, though. I asked what you think you've contributed to the game; all I've had in response is "define white noise" and "my posts aren't white noise under that definition".Howaren't they white noise? What, specifically, have you done to further the town's win condition
