Mini 857 Disney Movie Mafia 2 - The Classics (Roll Credits)

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:33 pm

Gorrad wrote:Satisfied as soon as you tell me why it was a pro-town thing to withhold that information.

Because I think it was scum that was mostly trying to get it.

LlamaFluff · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:33 pm

Vote Count

MonkeyMan576 (5) - semioldguy, Starbuck, Neopi, Crazy, Gorrad
Starbuck (2) - Jazzmyn, YankCane151
Neopi (2) - StrangerCoug, chamber

Not Voting (2) - MonkeyMan576, Brandi

Gorrad · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:33 pm

MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Satisfied as soon as you tell me why it was a pro-town thing to withhold that information.
Because I think it was scum that was mostly trying to get it.

Why?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:34 pm

Gorrad wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Satisfied as soon as you tell me why it was a pro-town thing to withhold that information.
Because I think it was scum that was mostly trying to get it.
Why?

Because Starbuck and Semioldguy are at the top of my scum list.

Gorrad · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:35 pm

MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Satisfied as soon as you tell me why it was a pro-town thing to withhold that information.
Because I think it was scum that was mostly trying to get it.
Why?
Because Starbuck and Semioldguy are at the top of my scum list.

And it would benefit them how?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:36 pm

Gorrad wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Satisfied as soon as you tell me why it was a pro-town thing to withhold that information.
Because I think it was scum that was mostly trying to get it.
Why?
Because Starbuck and Semioldguy are at the top of my scum list.
And it would benefit them how?

So they could determine if I was fakeclaiming or not. If they thought I was fakeclaiming(as a SK or something), they might be less likely to kill me right away.

YankCane151 · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:38 pm

Let me say, by the way, I'm not all too comfortbale having Monkey at L-1. There are other issues to settle on day 1 and I fear a scum might quicklynch and leave us wondering. We still need to deal with Neopi, If Brandi gets back/she gets replaced we need input from her/the replacement, and find some more stuff out about each other.

semioldguy · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:41 pm

MonkeyMan576 wrote:So they could determine if I was fakeclaiming or not.

This is a reason that benefits town.

Gorrad · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:46 pm

semioldguy wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:So they could determine if I was fakeclaiming or not.
This is a reason that benefits town.

QFT

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:47 pm

I'm more worried about being NK'd by scum than lynched by town at this point, even at L-1.

Gorrad · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:53 pm

Why? You've clearly been in the center of far too much suspicion to be a viable NK target. All scum has to do, assuming you're telling the truth, is put focus on another townie and you're rendered harmless!

Seriously. No sane scum would be putting pressure on you.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:59 pm

Gorrad wrote:Why? You've clearly been in the center of far too much suspicion to be a viable NK target. All scum has to do, assuming you're telling the truth, is put focus on another townie and you're rendered harmless!

Seriously. No sane scum would be putting pressure on you.

That's a lot of WIFOM.

Brandi · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:57 pm

Prod received, site was down yesterday O_o

Starbuck · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:05 pm

MonkeyMan576 wrote:Fine,

He's a watcher because he watches people out of windows.

He's conditional because pixie dust relies on happy thoughts and killing townies isn't happy.

Satisfied?

Why the fuck didn't you do this earlier?

Tell me why I should remove my vote on you for being so scumtastic.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:14 pm

Do whatever you want, I'm not begging for mercy from anyone.

Starbuck · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:22 pm

Your flavor makes sense in accordance with your claim. I really didn't learn anything new about you, but your flavor supports your claim. So I don't understand what was so difficult about that.

Unvote

, for now

I really don't want overzealous townies or scum to quickhammer.

Gorrad · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:48 pm

Starbuck wrote:Your flavor makes sense in accordance with your claim. I really didn't learn anything new about you, but your flavor supports your claim. So I don't understand what was so difficult about that.

Unvote
, for now

I really don't want overzealous townies or scum to quickhammer.

Nice 180 there.

Starbuck · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:56 pm

I thought about it after I posted 713, and his claim and flavor DO make sense. So the logical thing right now was to unvote.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:12 am

StrangerCoug wrote:
Starbuck wrote:Hypothesizing game makeup on this site is liable to get you modkilled.
Point me to a game where this has happened if you don't want me to believe you're posting this as a scare tactic.

You've posted several times without responding to this, so true to my threat, I believe you're trying to employ scare tactics to limit what MonkeyMan576 can talk about. I'm unhappy with the lynch right now.

MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Satisfied as soon as you tell me why it was a pro-town thing to withhold that information.
Because I think it was scum that was mostly trying to get it.
Why?
Because Starbuck and Semioldguy are at the top of my scum list.

This reeks a bit OMGUSy. Starbuck's down at, like... my #3 or #4 suspect, certainly not my top pic, and I don't see the case on semioldguy.

MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:
MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Satisfied as soon as you tell me why it was a pro-town thing to withhold that information.
Because I think it was scum that was mostly trying to get it.
Why?
Because Starbuck and Semioldguy are at the top of my scum list.
And it would benefit them how?
So they could determine if I was fakeclaiming or not. If they thought I was fakeclaiming(as a SK or something), they might be less likely to kill me right away.

If I'm not mistaken, more often than not scum believes claims from anybody else from true, and the only roles that would really hurt them to is bomb or vig faking something else.

Crazy · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:04 am

MonkeyMan576 wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Why? You've clearly been in the center of far too much suspicion to be a viable NK target. All scum has to do, assuming you're telling the truth, is put focus on another townie and you're rendered harmless!

Seriously. No sane scum would be putting pressure on you.
That's a lot of WIFOM.

Actually, it isn't. I'm sure the scum have bigger threats than a watcher that might not even get to watch that, in addition, appears scummy to a lot of people.

Your flavor makes sense. Withholding it for that long does not.

Starbuck · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:34 am

Crazy wrote:Your flavor makes sense. Withholding it for that long does not.

This.

chamber · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:59 am

Starbuck wrote:
Crazy wrote:Your flavor makes sense. Withholding it for that long does not.
This.

ALthough I agree with this statement, I don't agree with the conclusion that it doesn't make sense in a scummy way. It just doesn't make sense period.

Starbuck · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:09 am

chamber wrote:
Starbuck wrote:
Crazy wrote:Your flavor makes sense. Withholding it for that long does not.
This.
ALthough I agree with this statement, I don't agree with the conclusion that it doesn't make sense in a scummy way. It just doesn't make sense period.

I really don't understand what you are trying to say here.

Crazy · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:19 am

chamber wrote:
Starbuck wrote:
Crazy wrote:Your flavor makes sense. Withholding it for that long does not.
This.
ALthough I agree with this statement, I don't agree with the conclusion that it doesn't make sense in a scummy way. It just doesn't make sense period.

Unless if he needed time to come up with something that was convincing.

chamber · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:00 am

Crazy wrote:
chamber wrote:
Starbuck wrote:
Crazy wrote:Your flavor makes sense. Withholding it for that long does not.
This.
ALthough I agree with this statement, I don't agree with the conclusion that it doesn't make sense in a scummy way. It just doesn't make sense period.
Unless if he needed time to come up with something that was convincing.

The flavor he gave is the same flavour I assumed the second he claimed. I can`t imagine, that if he`s fake claiming, he came up with the role then the flavour. It would surely have to have been the other way around.