Nikanor's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1915966#1915966]Post 314[/url] wrote:Nikanor's 287 wrote:Do you really think Yankee would be this close to death so quickly if he were
n't
town?
Sorry, I typo'd. The negatives messed me up.
Yankee, do you think I'm scummy? Your 313 makes it look like you're voting me because you're confused.
Looker's 309 is just a pile of WIFOM and strawmanning, and I'm not responding to it.
Snow_Bunny's lurking isn't helping my suspicions of her.
Crap
Hey, those weren't random!
Now
these
,
THESE
are random.
Nikanor's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1894280#1894280]Post 84[/url] wrote:So who thinks the lovers should claim?
I'm pro-loverclaim.
Here are my reasons:
-The pro-town lovers will gain nigh immunity to night kills. If one set of lovers dies, we automatically lynch the other to catch scum.
-We can focus on other players, narrowing our day one lynch pool to eight.
However, I do acknowledge that it would put us in lylo after two mislynches, barring a doc protect, when it would usually only be mylo. I believe the pros outweigh the cons in this situation.
What do y'all think?
Initially a bad idea, however, as I've come to understand, Nikanor is smart, he's not oblivious to consequence or anything like that. (He's not stupid) However, he still thinks this is a good idea and pushes for it.
Then, when he changes his mind, instead of admitting it was a bad (scummy) idea, he insists he posted it because the game was stalling...hehe
. I believe he fully intended on following through with the lover lynches. Nikanor wanted to kill our lovers (which is a good move, by the way. Like I said, you're smart)
There were some people that suspected Head Honcho of being scum. Well, there you go, early collaboration for the lynching of our lovers.
But it was this part that really ticked me off. I'm currently town; however, I'm studying how mafia work within games, particularly this one, and I was all set to study the different tactics and everything when Nikanor busted this out on me, a quickly-builty bandwagon with "absolutely no reasoning whatsoever." The guy proposed a mislynch, and on ME!
He then jumped wagons just like that, never giving any reason why he picked me in particular or whether he thought me scummy or anything. He just jumped on Yankee's wagon and said that he'd still prefer my lynch when I didn't even do anything. (You're a bully, Nik!
)
Another example of Nik being a bully - he bullied Snow into voting Yankee. (I thought this was scummy, btw, so somebody should probably be keeping tabs on Snow
)
He says he found me scummy but never posted a case and when I ask him what evidence he has against me, he just generalizes (BSes) and says "lots of stuff", but Yankee is scummier, which translated to me as opportunism.
In Nikanor's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1913291#1913291]Post 260[/url], he wrote:
* For going back and forth between votes to see which one will stick.
Yup. I found both Looker and Yankee to be scummy. I have no idea why you people have such difficulties building a solid bandwagon. :/
* For talking so flippantly about lynching lovers.
What's your point? If we never lynch any lovers, we will lose. You wouldn't want that, would you?
Head_Honcho wrote:Lol. It is scummy to ask why someone is being railroaded?
It is scummy to ask for the case on confirmed scum, yes. Not that I'm calling him confirmed scum, but as I said in the thing you quoted, I'll only take Snow's post into consideration if Yankee flips scum.
Vino wrote:Snow Bunny, I presume you did a read of Yankee's posts like Nik asked you to, since you say you agree that he's scummy. What exactly do you find to be scummy?
I notice that Snow_Bunny has ignored this. If Yankee flips scum, Snow deserves a lynch for her obvious distancing on Yankee.
Looker wrote:Moi? What did I do?
Lots of stuff.
If it makes you feel any better, I think Yankee is scummier.
You wanted to know who I thought was scum, well now you've got it/there you have it. So much for lurkerville.
vote Nikanor