Why are these three mentioned in this context, but not Archon?Doombunny, post 305 wrote:Looker, Fuzzy, and Chaco. They have been posting low content posts and haven't been posting much at all.
How is my question fluffy? You [kikuchiyo] never commented on what you saw between them. Your comment earlier was that you saw the connection between Doom and saber. Then with no word to say otherwise, you say that you no longer see the connection between them.kikcuchiyo, post 317 wrote:Pretty old news here. I don't like this question at all. The buddying and defending between saber and Doom, and the discussion thereof, has taken up the majority of the day. Not quite sure how you missed it.
Your question seems "fluffy"
Doombunny's 344 makes me twitch. Do not like the whole "say something, or I'll vote you" aspect of the post.
At this point in my readthrough I think they are both scummy enough to deserve a good wagon.Amished, post 366 wrote:What are your exact opinions on *both* Doombunny and Saber?
This.Chaco, post 391 wrote:Here's me thoughts on the deal, Saber took a dive of activity once everyone started scrutinizing him and then a day or so later he decided to replace out. We'll be getting nothing from the replacement but "Don't kill me I'm [insert role claim]!". Because he will not know Saber's motives, and we are already so close to a lynch on him. I believe the best play we can do is just lynch Saber and see where that takes us.
kikcuchiyo's flip-flop on saber's lynch makes me twitch also. kikuchiyo, would you believe a vanilla claim?
fuzzy, Archon, and Netopolis need to start posting.
saber needs a hanging.